Literature DB >> 14532081

Assessment of the effects of holding time and temperature on Escherichia coli densities in surface water samples.

Misty L Pope1, Michelle Bussen, Mary Ann Feige, Lois Shadix, Sharon Gonder, Crystal Rodgers, Yildiz Chambers, Jessica Pulz, Ken Miller, Kevin Connell, Jon Standridge.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli is a routinely used microbiological indicator of water quality. To determine whether holding time and storage conditions had an effect on E. coli densities in surface water, studies were conducted in three phases, encompassing 24 sites across the United States and four commonly used monitoring methods. During all three phases of the study, E. coli samples were analyzed at time 0 and at 8, 24, 30, and 48 h after sample collection. During phase 1, when 4 degrees C samples were evaluated by Colilert or by placing a membrane onto mFC medium followed by transfer to nutrient agar containing 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-glucuronide (mFC/NA-MUG), three of four sites showed no significant differences throughout the 48-h study. During phase 2, five of seven sites showed no significant difference between time 0 and 24 h by membrane filtration (mFC/NA-MUG). When evaluated by the Colilert method, five of seven sites showed no significant difference in E. coli density between time 0 and 48 h. During phase 3, 8 of 13 sites showed no significant differences in E. coli densities between time 0 and the 48-h holding time, regardless of method. Based on the results of these studies, it appears that if samples are held below 10 degrees C and are not allowed to freeze, most surface water E. coli samples analyzed by commonly used methods beyond 8 h after sample collection can generate E. coli data comparable to those generated within 8 h of sample collection. Notwithstanding this conclusion, E. coli samples collected from surface waters should always be analyzed as soon as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14532081      PMCID: PMC201187          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6201-6207.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of four-hour and twenty-four-hour refrigerated storage of nonpotable water for fecal coliform analysis.

Authors:  J H Standridge; D J Lesar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Holding effects on coliform enumeration in drinking water samples.

Authors:  A E McDaniels; R H Bordner; P S Gartside; J R Haines; K P Brenner; C C Rankin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.792

  2 in total
  11 in total

1.  Volunteer monitoring of E. coli in streams of the upper Midwestern United States: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Kristine F Stepenuck; Lois G Wolfson; Barbara W Liukkonen; Jerome M Iles; Timothy S Grant
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Holding-time and method comparisons for the analysis of fecal-indicator bacteria in groundwater.

Authors:  Rebecca N Bushon; Amie M G Brady; Bruce D Lindsey
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  A Cross Sectional Study of the Association between Sanitation Type and Fecal Contamination of the Household Environment in Rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Tarique Md Nurul Huda; Wolf-Peter Schmidt; Amy J Pickering; Zahid Hayat Mahmud; Mohammad Sirajul Islam; Md Sajjadur Rahman; Stephen P Luby; Adam Biran
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Storage of oil field-produced waters alters their chemical and microbiological characteristics.

Authors:  Jordan C Hulecki; Julia M Foght; Phillip M Fedorak
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Effects of stock use and backpackers on water quality in wilderness in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, USA.

Authors:  David W Clow; Harrison Forrester; Benjamin Miller; Heidi Roop; James O Sickman; Hodon Ryu; Jorge Santo Domingo
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Effects of field storage method on E. coli concentrations measured in storm water runoff.

Authors:  Daren Harmel; Kevin Wagner; Emily Martin; Doug Smith; Pauline Wanjugi; Terry Gentry; Lucas Gregory; Tina Hendon
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Bacteria holding times for fecal coliform by mFC agar method and total coliform and Escherichia coli by Colilert-18 Quanti-Tray method.

Authors:  Brent T Aulenbach
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Microbiological and Chemical Quality of Packaged Sachet Water and Household Stored Drinking Water in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Authors:  Michael B Fisher; Ashley R Williams; Mohamed F Jalloh; George Saquee; Robert E S Bain; Jamie K Bartram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Human fecal contamination of water, soil, and surfaces in households sharing poor-quality sanitation facilities in Maputo, Mozambique.

Authors:  David A Holcomb; Jackie Knee; Trent Sumner; Zaida Adriano; Ellen de Bruijn; Rassul Nalá; Oliver Cumming; Joe Brown; Jill R Stewart
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 5.840

10.  Rainfall-driven E. coli transfer to the stream-conduit network observed through increasing spatial scales in mixed land-use paddy farming karst terrain.

Authors:  Sarah J Buckerfield; Richard S Quilliam; Susan Waldron; Larissa A Naylor; Siliang Li; David M Oliver
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2019-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.