Literature DB >> 26436138

Structure-Based Design of Dendritic Peptide Bolaamphiphiles for siRNA Delivery.

Hanxiang Zeng1, Mark E Johnson1, Nathan J Oldenhuis1, Timothy N Tiambeng1, Zhibin Guan1.   

Abstract

Development of safe and effective delivery vectors is a critical challenge for the application of RNA interference (RNAi)-based biotechnologies. In this study we show the rational design of a series of novel dendritic peptide bolaamphiphile vectors that demonstrate high efficiency for the delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) while exhibiting low cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity. Systematic investigation into structure-property relationships revealed an important correlation between molecular design, self-assembled nanostructure, and biological activity. The unique bolaamphiphile architecture proved a key factor for improved complex stability and transfection efficiency. The optimal vector contains a fluorocarbon core and exhibited enhanced delivery efficiency to a variety of cell lines and improved serum resistance when compared to hydrocarbon analogues and lipofectamine RNAiMAX. In addition to introducing a promising new vector system for siRNA delivery, the structure-property relationships and "fluorocarbon effect" revealed herein offer critical insight for further development of novel materials for nucleic acid delivery and other biomaterial applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26436138      PMCID: PMC4582325          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Introduction

Since its discovery, RNA interference (RNAi) has demonstrated tremendous utility in a variety of biological applications, including experimental biology,[1] functional genomics,[2] stem cell research,[3] and treatment of diseases.[4,5] The high potency and specificity of gene silencing induced by small interfering RNA (siRNA) makes this technology particularly appealing for medicinal applications; however, safe and efficient delivery of siRNA into targeted cells remains a major challenge.[5−7] Much effort has been devoted to the development of synthetic delivery vectors[8] with a variety of systems being investigated, including lipids,[9−11] peptides,[12−15] polymers,[16−19] dendrimers,[20,21] and gold nanoparticles.[22,23] Cationic lipids (such as lipofectamine) and polymers (such as poly(ethylene imine), PEI) have been widely used in a variety of biological studies; however, toxicity and delivery efficiency are often limiting factors for these early vectors.[24−26] Recently lipid nanoparticles (LNPs)[8,11,27] and polymeric vectors[16,28] have demonstrated great promise for therapeutic delivery of siRNA to the liver and solid tumors. Despite major advances, the efficiency of endosomal escape of most vectors is generally low,[29,30] and interaction of conventional cationic lipids and polymers with the cell membrane can result in membrane disruption, altered cell behavior, and cytotoxicity.[24,26,31−33] While combinatorial approaches have proven useful for the discovery of new vectors,[10,34] a deeper understanding of how structural parameters affect transfection efficiency, circulatory stability, serum resistance, and ultimately in vivo efficacy would be of great value for the further development of synthetic siRNA vectors. Toward this goal, a systematic approach based on direct structure–activity correlation should advance our basic understanding and facilitate the rational design of effective new vectors. Herein we report the rational design of a dendritic peptide bolaamphiphile for safe and efficient siRNA delivery (Figure ). Unlike regular lipid-like amphiphiles (termed “mono-amphiphile”), which are composed of one or more hydrophobic tails and a single hydrophilic headgroup, bolaamphiphiles (termed “bola”) are dumbbell-shaped molecules having two hydrophilic headgroups connected via a hydrophobic core (Figure a,b).[35] In nature, bolaamphiphiles are found in cell membranes of certain kinds of extremophile archaebacteria with the monolayer assemblies, as opposed to the bilayer structures of normal lipids, providing improved stability under harsh conditions.[36] The robust self-assembly of bolaamphiphiles makes them attractive for biomaterials applications, with several recent reports of gene delivery using bolaamphiphile-based vectors.[37−40] We envision that the unique molecular architecture of bolas can be exploited to disfavor insertion into the cell membrane and offer a more biocompatible alternative to conventional lipids. The use of a hydrophobic core shorter than the native phospholipid bilayer should prevent direct membrane insertion due to unfavorable thermodynamics, with the use of relatively large dendritic headgroups to disfavor a U-shaped conformation (Figure a).
Figure 1

Design concept and structure of bolaamphiphiles. (a) Schematic illustration of mono-amphiphile and bolaamphiphile. (b) Design of dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles. Bolaamphiphiles are composed of two dendritic peptide headgroups linked to a hydrophobic core by reducible disulfide linkages. The multifunctional dendritic peptide headgroups are functionalized with 75 mol % histidine (His) and 25 mol % tryptophan (Trp) on periphery. (c) Structures of dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles. The structure of bola-C18-G2 is shown as an example. The dendritic peptide headgroups range from generation-1 (G1) to generation-3 (G3) dendrons. A series of hydrophobic cores as shown were used in the structure–property studies. (d) Structures of three dendritic peptide mono-amphiphiles used for comparative studies.

Figure 2

Hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity of bolaamphiphiles. (a) Proposed low membrane disruption character of dendritic bolaamphiphiles in comparison to mono-amphiphiles. Because of the unique molecular architecture, bolaamphiphiles should be more difficult to insert into the cell membrane, causing less membrane disruption. In contrast, mono-amphiphiles can insert into membrane more easily and cause membrane disruption due to their structural similarity to native phospholipids. (b) Hemolytic activity of both mono- and bolaamphiphiles as % hemolysis of bovine red blood cells. (c) Cytotoxicity of both mono- and bolaamphiphiles to NIH 3T3 cells as determined by MTT assay.

Design concept and structure of bolaamphiphiles. (a) Schematic illustration of mono-amphiphile and bolaamphiphile. (b) Design of dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles. Bolaamphiphiles are composed of two dendritic peptide headgroups linked to a hydrophobic core by reducible disulfide linkages. The multifunctional dendritic peptide headgroups are functionalized with 75 mol % histidine (His) and 25 mol % tryptophan (Trp) on periphery. (c) Structures of dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles. The structure of bola-C18-G2 is shown as an example. The dendritic peptide headgroups range from generation-1 (G1) to generation-3 (G3) dendrons. A series of hydrophobic cores as shown were used in the structure–property studies. (d) Structures of three dendritic peptide mono-amphiphiles used for comparative studies. Hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity of bolaamphiphiles. (a) Proposed low membrane disruption character of dendritic bolaamphiphiles in comparison to mono-amphiphiles. Because of the unique molecular architecture, bolaamphiphiles should be more difficult to insert into the cell membrane, causing less membrane disruption. In contrast, mono-amphiphiles can insert into membrane more easily and cause membrane disruption due to their structural similarity to native phospholipids. (b) Hemolytic activity of both mono- and bolaamphiphiles as % hemolysis of bovine red blood cells. (c) Cytotoxicity of both mono- and bolaamphiphiles to NIH 3T3 cells as determined by MTT assay. The second important design component is the choice of dendritic headgroup (Figure b,c), for which we chose a lysine-based dendron functionalized with 75 mol % histidine (His) and 25 mol % tryptophan (Trp), the optimal combination for our previous dendronized polymer vector.[41] The dendritic headgroup provides multivalent interactions for efficient binding of siRNA, with the size and valency controllable through the use of different dendron generations. On the basis of our previous study, Trp improves siRNA binding and cell uptake, while His facilitates endosomal escape due to the pH-responsive nature of the imidazole ring.[41] The third key component in our bola design is the hydrophobic core for promoting self-assembly in aqueous solution. As shown in Figure c, a variety of hydrophobic cores were studied by systematically changing several molecular parameters such as the length, geometry, and chemical nature. Given the unique self-assembly properties of fluorocarbons and previous reports on fluorinated vectors,[42−46] we envisioned that the fluorocarbon linker could promote robust self-assembly and also impact the cellular uptake, serum stability, and biodistribution of the complexes. The final design element is the disulfide linkages (Figure b,c), connecting the dendritic peptide headgroups to the central hydrophobic core to provide stimuli-responsive intracellular disassembly of the complexes, facilitating siRNA release in cytosol.[51]

Results and Discussion

A representative peptide bola structure (bola-C18-G2) is shown in Figure c. The amphiphiles are named as follows: m- for mono-amphiphile and bola- for bolaamphiphile, followed by the structure of the hydrophobic core (e.g., C18) and then the generation of the dendron headgroups (e.g., G2). Different hydrophobic cores were investigated, including hydrocarbon chains of various lengths (C6-C22) and a fluorocarbon core (F10). The length of the hydrophobic cores was chosen to be significantly shorter than the width of a typical phospholipid bilayer membrane so that bolas will not be able to span across the entire bilayer and cause cell membrane disruption. A control molecule containing a hexa(ethylene glycol) core (HEG) was included as the hydrophilic core should not induce self-assembly in aqueous solution. A hydrophobic core containing a 1,2,3-triazole (TZ) was also synthesized to probe the effect of the kinked backbone. The size of the dendron headgroup was varied from first to third generation (G1–G3). For a direct comparison between mono- and bolaamphiphiles, three mono-amphiphile analogues were synthesized containing either a C11 alkyl tail (m-C11) or one to two oleic acid moieties (m-OA or m-OA2), with the structures shown in Figure d. It should be noted that linear peptide mono-amphiphiles have been extensively studied for self-assembly and biomaterials applications.[52,53] All molecules were synthesized by solution-phase coupling reactions, and detailed synthesis and characterization data can be found in the Supporting Information. Our hypothesis of low membrane disruption for bolas was first tested by hemolysis assays. Bovine red blood cells (RBC) were treated with the amphiphiles at various concentrations, and the release of hemoglobin from the RBC was measured as an indicator of membrane lytic activity. Supporting our hypothesis, the mono-amphiphiles exhibited greater hemolytic activity than the bolas (Figure b). The hydrophobic tail of mono-amphiphiles significantly influenced their hemolytic activity, as the longer OA amphiphile exhibited 4 times higher membrane lysis than the shorter C11 amphiphile. The double tailed OA2 amphiphile induced a relatively high degree of hemolysis at lower concentrations, but plateaued at higher concentration, possibly due to self-assembly at higher concentration. In sharp contrast, the C18 bolas exhibited very low hemolytic activity, with G2 inducing less than 1% hemolysis and G1 ≈ 3% hemolysis at 250 μg/mL. The higher hemolysis induced by G1 bola agrees with our proposed headgroup size effect, as the small G1 dendron provides less steric hindrance to the U-shaped conformation. The different hemolytic activity of these dendron amphiphiles correlates well with their cytotoxicity. As shown in Figure c, all G2 bolaamphiphiles are about 2 orders of magnitude less cytotoxic to 3T3 fibroblast cells than the analogous mono-amphiphiles. The increased cytotoxicity of bola-C18-G3 is presumably due to the higher valency of cationic charges of the G3 dendron. For comparison, branched PEI (Mn ≈ 25 kDa), a commonly used polymer for gene delivery studies, induces much greater toxicity than both mono- and bolaamphiphiles, further confirming the safety of bolas for siRNA delivery. The mono- and bolaamphiphiles were screened for gene silencing activity in NIH 3T3 cells expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). Initial transfection and gel electrophoresis experiments suggested that while most vectors fully complexed siRNA by N/P = 10 (the molar ratio of the charged amines of the vector to the phosphates of RNA) the knockdown effect was not saturated until N/P = 30–45, and for all further studies a N/P ratio of 45 was utilized (Figure S1). For comparison to the toxicity and hemolysis assays, bola-F10-G2 complexes formed at N/P = 45 with [siRNA] = 100 nM have a vector concentration of 110 μg/mL, at which no significant toxic effect was observed (Figure c). In general, mono-amphiphiles showed very little gene silencing with the most efficacious, m-OA2-G2, inducing only ∼25% knockdown (Figure b). In contrast, bolaamphiphiles containing the fluorocarbon (F10) or hydrocarbon cores of sufficient length (C18, C22) with G2 or G3 headgroups displayed effective gene silencing. The introduction of triazole ring in the hydrophobic core (TZ) did not significantly change the transfection efficiency. Bolaamphiphiles based on shorter cores (bola-C6-G2 and bola-C12-G2) or bearing G1 headgroups failed to induce a strong knockdown response (Figure a). The vector containing a hydrophilic linker (bola-HEG-G2) was completely ineffective at gene silencing, presumably due to the lack of hydrophobic self-assembly.
Figure 3

Transfection, TEM imaging, DLS analysis, and gel eletrophoresis of different amphiphile/siRNA complexes. (a, b) Initial transfection screening of bola- and mono-amphiphiles in GFP-expressing NIH 3T3 cells. N/P ratio = 45 and [siRNA] = 100 nM. (c–e) Negative-stain TEM (uranyl acetate) images of vector/siRNA complexes: bola-C18-G1 (c), bola-C18-G2 (d), and bola-C18-G3 (e), scale bars = 200 nm. (f, g) Cryo-TEM imaging of bola-C18-G2 in PBS, scale bar = 200 nm (f) and 100 nm (g). (h) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) particle size and zeta potential analysis of vector/siRNA complexes prepared at N/P = 45 in PBS. (i–k) Dextran sulfate competitive binding assay with different bola complexes (N/P = 45) with the numbers above the wells indicating the S/P ratio (molar ratio of sulfate on dextran sulfate to phosphates on siRNA). (l) Triggered siRNA release by reducing reagent glutathione (GSH). Different bola-G2 complexes (N/P = 45, named by the core) were treated with GSH (+) or PBS (−) for 60 min before gel electrophoresis.

Transfection, TEM imaging, DLS analysis, and gel eletrophoresis of different amphiphile/siRNA complexes. (a, b) Initial transfection screening of bola- and mono-amphiphiles in GFP-expressing NIH 3T3 cells. N/P ratio = 45 and [siRNA] = 100 nM. (c–e) Negative-stain TEM (uranyl acetate) images of vector/siRNA complexes: bola-C18-G1 (c), bola-C18-G2 (d), and bola-C18-G3 (e), scale bars = 200 nm. (f, g) Cryo-TEM imaging of bola-C18-G2 in PBS, scale bar = 200 nm (f) and 100 nm (g). (h) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) particle size and zeta potential analysis of vector/siRNA complexes prepared at N/P = 45 in PBS. (i–k) Dextran sulfate competitive binding assay with different bola complexes (N/P = 45) with the numbers above the wells indicating the S/P ratio (molar ratio of sulfate on dextran sulfate to phosphates on siRNA). (l) Triggered siRNA release by reducing reagent glutathione (GSH). Different bola-G2 complexes (N/P = 45, named by the core) were treated with GSH (+) or PBS (−) for 60 min before gel electrophoresis. To understand the correlation between molecular structure and delivery efficiency, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was utilized to examine the morphology of different amphiphile/siRNA complexes. Figure c–e displays TEM images of different bola-C18/siRNA complexes stained with uranyl acetate, demonstrating that the size of the dendritic headgroup influences the morphology of the assembled nanostructures dramatically. The compound with the smallest headgroup, bola-C18-G1, can pack closely to form twisted nanofibers, similar in morphology to the structures previously reported for well-packed bola assemblies (Figure c).[35] As the headgroup increases in size, both steric effects and charge repulsion disfavor the formation of densely packed nanofibrils, with bola-C18-G2 and bola-C18-G3 complexes appearing as circular features consistent with assembly into nanoparticles (Figure d,e). The larger headgroup of G3 bolaamphiphiles further reduces the packing efficiency for the hydrophobic core, resulting in larger particles than G2 bolaamphiphiles. Complexes formed using G2 bolaamphiphiles containing fluorocarbon (F10) or 1,2,3-triazole (TZ) cores also displayed nanoparticle morphology (Figure S2a–c), as did both mono-amphiphiles containing a single hydrophobic tail (m-C11-G2, m-OA-G2, Figure S2d,e). The m-OA2-G2 complexes formed fibrillar structures similar to those observed in the bola-C18-G1 images, potentially due to increased hydrophobic interactions from the additional oleate tail enhancing the stability of assembly (Figure S2f). Cryo-TEM was further used to observe the in situ morphology of the vector/siRNA complexes in PBS with bola-C18-G2 chosen for initial analysis. The cryo-TEM images of bola-C18-G2 (Figure f,g) complexes were characterized by nanoparticles with an average diameter of 88 ± 19 nm, which appear to be composed of smaller “granules” approximately 10–20 nm in diameter. Nanoparticles displaying similar “raspberry” morphology have been observed for siRNA complexes of the peptide vector CADY.[47] The particle size and zeta potential of the complexes were analyzed using dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Figure h). Complexes formed from vectors lacking a hydrophobic core or sufficient length (bola-HEG-G2, bola-C6-G2) did not provide enough signals for analysis, consistent with a lack of assembly. The complexes that formed fibrillar assemblies as observed by TEM (bola-C18-G1, m-OA2-G2) produced scattering signal, but the data did not correlate when analyzed via standard methods, possibly due to the formation of irregular aggregates or fibrillar networks. For both bola-C18 and bola-F10 vectors the particle size of G2 was smaller than that of the G3, while the particle size decreased with increasing length of alkyl core from bola-C12-G2, bola-C18-G2, to bola-C22-G2. The trend is consistent with proposed assembly stability, with smaller headgroup and longer hydrophobic core condensing siRNA into smaller particles and larger headgroup and shorter core into larger particles. The zeta potential of the vector/siRNA complexes was also measured, with all samples displaying a positive surface charge between 15 and 20 mV. Mono amphiphile/siRNA complexes, m-C11-G2 and m-OA-G2, showed similar particle characteristics in DLS, with a slightly larger size than the bola analogue (bola-C22-G2). In our bola design, we hypothesized that the more stable nanoparticles formed by bolaamphiphiles should enhance the siRNA binding strength, which was assessed via a competitive binding assay using the anionic polymer dextran sulfate (DS, Mn ≈ 25 kDa). Although m-C11-G2 and bola-C22-G2 have exactly the same chemical composition, the bola complexes exhibited much higher stability with little siRNA release up to S/P = 23 (the molar ratio of sulfate from DS and phosphate from siRNA), while the mono-amphiphile complex started to release siRNA at S/P = 8 (Figure S3a,b). Furthermore, the proposed self-assembly model agrees with the stability of different bola complexes. As shown in Figure i–k, despite having headgroups with the lowest level of multivalency, bola-C18-G1 exhibited the strongest siRNA binding with no siRNA release up to S/P of 30, presumably due to the stable fibrillar assembly. The vectors bola-C18-G2 and bola-C18-G3, which demonstrated nanoparticle assembly by TEM, showed siRNA release at the lower S/P ratios of 23 and 15, respectively. The fluorocarbon vector, bola-F10-G2, demonstrated stronger siRNA binding than the hydrocarbon analogue bola-C18-G2 with no siRNA release until S/P = 30 (Figure S3c), again presumably due to the more robust self-assembly induced by the fluorocarbon core. The bolaamphiphiles containing either the shortest hydrocarbon (bola-C6-G2) or hydrophilic core (bola-HEG-G2) failed to effectively complex siRNA (Figure S3e,g). Stimuli-responsive siRNA release from bola complexes was demonstrated by incubation of the complexes with glutathione (GSH) followed by subsequent gel electrophoresis, which showed effective decomplexation for the GSH treated samples (Figure l). The different self-assembly behavior was corroborated by infrared (IR) spectroscopy. The methylene (CH2) groups in the alkyl region prefer trans conformation in highly ordered packing structure, resulting in lower frequency for their C–H stretching peaks.[54]Figure S4 shows that from G1 to G3 bola complexes, both the asymmetric (∼2930 cm–1) and symmetric (∼2850 cm–1) C–H stretch peaks shifted to higher frequency, indicating less ordered structure in the alkyl region. This agrees with the proposed self-assembly model, with decreasing packing order from nanofibril to nanoparticle, caused by the enhanced electrostatic repulsion and sterics associated with increasing valency of the cationic dendron. The cellular uptake of amphiphile-siRNA complexes was investigated by confocal fluorescence microscopy using Cy3 labeled siRNA (Figure a–d). The mono-amphiphile (m-C11- G2) complexes showed no cellular uptake with no detectable signal from Cy3-siRNA (Figure a), while bola-C18-G1/siRNA complexes formed aggregates on the cell surface and were not internalized (Figure b), in agreement with the observed low gene knockdown for both of these vectors (Figure a,b). Complexes formed with both bola-C18-G2 and bola-C18-G3 showed significant cellular uptake of siRNA, with G2 exhibiting higher efficiency (Figure c,d). The Cy3-siRNA uptake was further quantified by flow cytometry (Figure e–h). Compared to lipofectamine, Cy3-siRNA complexes with all three mono-amphiphiles showed very low cellular uptake (Figure e), while bola-C18-G2 and bola-F10-G2 exhibited 20–40 times higher uptake than lipofectamine (Figure f). Bolas with either shorter alkane cores (C6 and C12) or a hydrophilic HEG core could not form stable complexes, and no cellular uptake of Cy3-siRNA was detected (Figure f). Notably, cell uptake efficiency was directly related to the size of headgroup. Both boa-C18-G2 and bola-F10-G2 showed much higher cell uptake than their G3 analogues (Figure g,h), which could be attributed to the higher stability and smaller size of G2 complexes.
Figure 4

Cell uptake of different amphiphile/siRNA complexes. Cys3-siRNA was complexed with different amphiphiles and transfected to NIH 3T3 cells. (a–d) Confocal fluorescence images of transfected cells (cell nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI, scale bar: 20 μm). (e, f) Cell uptake of siRNA complexes with different mono- and bolaamphiphiles quantified by flow cytometry. (g, h) Cell uptake of G2 and G3 bolaamphiphile vectors. (i, j) Transfection of Cy3-siRNA complexes carried out at 37 or 4 °C. (k) Transfection of 3T3 cells pretreated with sodium azide (NaN3) and 2-deoxy-d-glucose (DG). (l, m) Endocytotic pathway of bola complexes. 3T3 cells were treated with chlorpromazine (30 μM, inhibitor of clathrin-mediated endocytosis), genistein (350 μM, inhibitor of caveolar endocytosis), or ethylisopropylamiloride (EIPA, 30 μM, inhibitor of macropinocytosis) for 1 h before transfection of Cy3-siRNA/bola complexes.

Cell uptake of different amphiphile/siRNA complexes. Cys3-siRNA was complexed with different amphiphiles and transfected to NIH 3T3 cells. (a–d) Confocal fluorescence images of transfected cells (cell nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI, scale bar: 20 μm). (e, f) Cell uptake of siRNA complexes with different mono- and bolaamphiphiles quantified by flow cytometry. (g, h) Cell uptake of G2 and G3 bolaamphiphile vectors. (i, j) Transfection of Cy3-siRNA complexes carried out at 37 or 4 °C. (k) Transfection of 3T3 cells pretreated with sodium azide (NaN3) and 2-deoxy-d-glucose (DG). (l, m) Endocytotic pathway of bola complexes. 3T3 cells were treated with chlorpromazine (30 μM, inhibitor of clathrin-mediated endocytosis), genistein (350 μM, inhibitor of caveolar endocytosis), or ethylisopropylamiloride (EIPA, 30 μM, inhibitor of macropinocytosis) for 1 h before transfection of Cy3-siRNA/bola complexes. To further understand the cell uptake process, we chose bola-F10-G2 and bola-F10-G3 as representative vectors to study the cell uptake pathway. Figure i–k shows that the cell uptake of bola/Cy3-siRNA complexes are energy dependent, with low temperature (4 °C) completely shutting down the uptake (Figure i,j) and the metabolic inhibitor NaN3/2-deoxy-d-glucose inhibiting uptake in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure k). The cell uptake mechanism was further studied by using several small molecule inhibitors to specifically block three common endocytotic pathways: clathrin-mediated endocytosis (chlorpromazine), caveolar endocytosis (genistein), and macropinocytosis (EIPA).[55,56] As shown in Figure l,m, siRNA/bola-F10-G2 complexes were internalized through both clathrin-mediated and caveolar pathways. The bola-F10-G3 complexes entered the cell through caveolae-mediated endocytosis almost exclusively, which can be explained by the larger particle size of the bola-F10-G3 complexes.[48,49] The clear dependence of cell uptake on inhibitor concentration (Figure S5) further confirms the cellular uptake pathway. To demonstrate the general efficacy of these vectors, transfections were carried out in the following luciferase-expressing cell lines: MDA-MB-231, HEK, INS-1, and 4T1 (Figure a). Similar to the results obtained from 3T3 cells, mono-amphiphile m-C11-G2 did not achieve any significant gene knockdown and induced substantial toxicity in HEK and 4T1 cells. In contrast, bolaamphiphiles C18-G2 and F10-G2 both displayed robust luciferase knockdown with minimal cytotoxicity. Notably, for the 4T1 cell line in which lipofectamine failed to induce a strong knockdown response, both C18-G2 and F10-G2 effectively silenced luciferase expression.
Figure 5

Transfection study in different cell lines and in the presence of serum. (a) Luciferase silencing data for various amphiphiles in different cell lines including MDA-MB-231, HEK 293, β-INS-1, and 4T1. N/P = 45, [siRNA] = 100 nM, viability measured by MTT assay. (b, c) Dose/response curves of bola-C18-G2 (b) and bola-F10-G2 (c) vectors in MDA-MB-231 cells. N/P = 45 for all samples, [siRNA] indicated on x-axis. (d) Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells in serum-containing medium. N/P = 45, [siRNA] = 50 nM, final concentration of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in antibiotic-free DMEM transfection media indicated on the x-axis.

Transfection study in different cell lines and in the presence of serum. (a) Luciferase silencing data for various amphiphiles in different cell lines including MDA-MB-231, HEK 293, β-INS-1, and 4T1. N/P = 45, [siRNA] = 100 nM, viability measured by MTT assay. (b, c) Dose/response curves of bola-C18-G2 (b) and bola-F10-G2 (c) vectors in MDA-MB-231 cells. N/P = 45 for all samples, [siRNA] indicated on x-axis. (d) Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells in serum-containing medium. N/P = 45, [siRNA] = 50 nM, final concentration of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in antibiotic-free DMEM transfection media indicated on the x-axis. The previously discussed transfection studies used phosphate buffer (PBS, 10 mM phosphate, 10 mM NaCl, pH = 7.4) for sample preparation (Figure a,b and Figure a); however, it was observed during optimization that complexes prepared in OptiMEM induced significantly higher knockdown at low concentrations than those prepared in PBS. This optimized protocol was used to further test the transfection efficiency of the vectors in MDA-MB-231 cells, with dose/response curves and IC50 values determined for bola-C18-G2, bola-C18-G3, bola-F10-G2, and bola-F10-G3. The fluorocarbon vector bola-F10-G2 demonstrated highly efficient transfection with an IC50 value of 2.7 nM, while the analogous hydrocarbon vector, bola-C18-G2, was less effective with an IC50 of 18.7 nM (Figure b,c). For both C18 and F10 cores, the G3 variants displayed higher transfection efficiency than the corresponding G2 analogues, with calculated IC50 values of 1.0 nM and 7.4 nM for bola-F10-G3 and bola-C18-G2, respectively (Figure S6). These results suggest that the fluorocarbon linker greatly enhanced the delivery efficiency, with both F10 vectors displaying IC50 values ∼7 times lower than the corresponding hydrocarbon analogues. The toxicity of the bolaamphiphile/siRNA complexes prepared using OptiMEM was assessed via the MTT assay, with the results corroborating the previously observed trend of G3 inducing greater cytotoxicity than G2 for both C18 and F10 linkers (Figure S7). Although typical in vitro transections are performed in reduced serum or serum-free media, successful transfection in the presence of negatively charged serum components is critical for in vivo application. To investigate the serum stability of our vectors, transfections were performed varying the final concentration of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in the transfection media from 0 to 80% (Figure d). While lipofectamine RNAiMAX and bola-C18-G2 were negatively affected even at low serum content, the gene silencing effects of bola-F10-G2 were not affected by the presence of up to 80% FBS. The analogous G3 variant, bola-F10-G3, showed a slight decrease in efficacy at higher FBS concentrations, which can be attributed to less stable assembly and consequentially weaker siRNA binding due to the larger dendritic headgroup. The improved serum stability and efficacy of our fluorocarbon bolaamphiphiles compared to those containing hydrocarbon cores are in agreement with previous reports on the use of fluorinated lipids for siRNA delivery.[44] With recent reports of fluorination greatly enhancing DNA transfection efficiency of PAMAM dendrimers,[45,50] we believe this “fluorocarbon effect” may be generally applicable to other amphiphilic vectors. On the basis of the data presented in this paper, a structure–property relationship can be derived for dendritic peptide amphiphiles for siRNA delivery (Table ). Compared to the mono-amphiphiles studied, all G2 bolaamphiphiles of similar length displayed stronger siRNA binding, reduced cytotoxicity, and greatly enhanced transfection efficiency. The size of the cationic dendron was observed to have a major influence on the morphology and biological activity of the complexes, with the fibrillar assemblies formed by bola-C18-G1 affording dramatically less knockdown than the nanoparticle bola-C18-G2 and bola-C18-G3 complexes (Table ). While both G2 and G3 bolaamphiphiles are highly efficient for siRNA transfection, G2 vectors exhibit much higher serum stability than G3 analogues. The use of a fluorocarbon, as opposed to hydrocarbon core greatly enhanced both the transfection efficacy and serum stability of the complexes, suggesting that further investigation into fluorocarbon-based vectors may prove particularly fruitful.
Table 1

Structure–Property Relationship of Dendritic Peptide Amphiphiles for siRNA Delivery

molecular structureassembly with siRNAcell uptakesiRNA transfectionserum stability
mono-amphiphilesnanoparticle/nanofibrillow cell uptake, highly membrane disruptivelow 
bolaamphiphile, small headgroup (G1)nanofibrilaggregate on cell surface, no uptakenone 
bolaamphiphile, medium headgroup (G2)smaller nanoparticleclathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis, high cell uptakehigh efficiencyhigh
bolaamphiphile, large headgroup (G3)larger nanoparticlecaveolae-mediated endocytosis, low cell uptakehigh efficiencylow

Conclusion

With the high siRNA transfection efficiency in multiple cell lines, excellent serum resistance, and low cytotoxicity and hemolysis, the dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles presented in this study are promising candidates for further gene delivery applications. Through a rational design approach, we were able to directly link the molecular structure of different vectors to their assembly morphologies and the resulting biological activities (Table ). The unique bolaamphiphile architecture proved a key factor for improved complex stability, low cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity, and high transfection efficiency. The optimal vector contains a fluorocarbon core and exhibited enhanced delivery efficiency to a variety of cell lines and improved serum resistance when compared to hydrocarbon analogues and lipofectamine RNAiMAX. The high transfection efficiency of the fluorocarbon vectors and the direct correlation from molecular structure to self-assembly behavior to subsequent biologic activity offer critical insight aiding the rational design of new materials for nucleic acid delivery and other biomaterial applications.

Methods

Amphiphile/siRNA Complex Preparation (PBS)

The 5× complex solution for transfection was prepared by pipet mixing of the amphiphile and siRNA solutions. In a typical procedure, 1.5 μM siRNA solution was prepared with PBS buffer (10 mM phosphate, 10 mM NaCl, pH = 7.4). Different amphiphile solutions (5 mg/mL) were diluted with PBS buffer to a final volume of 13.3 μL per well. The 13.3 μL of amphiphile solution was then added to 6.7 μL of 1.5 μM siRNA solution (final 5× siRNA concentration = 500 nM), followed by brief vortexing. The solution was incubated at room temperature for 30 min before addition to the cell culture media.

Optimized Complex Preparation (OptiMEM)

The vector/siRNA complexes were prepared by first diluting the vector to the desired concentration using antibiotic-free OptiMEM. The siRNA was diluted to 1.5 μM with OptiMEM, and an appropriate amount of this solution was added to the diluted vector to give a complex solution with siRNA concentration of 500 nM. After 10 min incubation, this complex solution was further diluted to the desired concentration with OptiMEM and used immediately.

Transfection and Flow Cytometry

NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells were seeded at a density of 10 000 cells/well in 48-well plates 24 h in advance. Prior to transfection, the media was replaced with 80 μL of antibiotic-free DMEM, and 20 μL of the previously described 5× complex solutions were added to each well to give 100 nM final siRNA concentration. After 4 h incubation, the medium was changed back to 250 μL of DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and cultured for another 48 h. Before the analysis, cells were released from each well by Trypsin and harvested by centrifugation (5 min, 500g). Fluorescence of transfected cells was measured on a Becton-Dickinson LSR II flow cytometer with argon ion excitation laser. For each sample, data representing 10 000 objects were collected as a list-mode file and analyzed using FACSDivaTM software. The normalized GFP expression was calculated by comparing cells treated with anti-GFP siRNA complexes to a control sample treated with complexes prepared with nontargeting siRNA.
  53 in total

1.  Self-assembling peptide-based nanoparticles for siRNA delivery in primary cell lines.

Authors:  Sébastien Deshayes; Karidia Konate; Anna Rydström; Laurence Crombez; Cédric Godefroy; Pierre-Emmanuel Milhiet; Annick Thomas; Robert Brasseur; Gudrun Aldrian; Frédéric Heitz; Maria A Muñoz-Morris; Jean-Marie Devoisselle; Gilles Divita
Journal:  Small       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 13.281

2.  A new potent secondary amphipathic cell-penetrating peptide for siRNA delivery into mammalian cells.

Authors:  Laurence Crombez; Gudrun Aldrian-Herrada; Karidia Konate; Quan N Nguyen; Gary K McMaster; Robert Brasseur; Frederic Heitz; Gilles Divita
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 3.  siRNA delivery using peptide transduction domains.

Authors:  Akiko Eguchi; Steven F Dowdy
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  A fluorinated dendrimer achieves excellent gene transfection efficacy at extremely low nitrogen to phosphorus ratios.

Authors:  Mingming Wang; Hongmei Liu; Lei Li; Yiyun Cheng
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Co-injection of a targeted, reversibly masked endosomolytic polymer dramatically improves the efficacy of cholesterol-conjugated small interfering RNAs in vivo.

Authors:  So C Wong; Jason J Klein; Holly L Hamilton; Qili Chu; Christina L Frey; Vladimir S Trubetskoy; Julia Hegge; Darren Wakefield; David B Rozema; David L Lewis
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.486

6.  Lipopeptide nanoparticles for potent and selective siRNA delivery in rodents and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Yizhou Dong; Kevin T Love; J Robert Dorkin; Sasilada Sirirungruang; Yunlong Zhang; Delai Chen; Roman L Bogorad; Hao Yin; Yi Chen; Arturo J Vegas; Christopher A Alabi; Gaurav Sahay; Karsten T Olejnik; Weiheng Wang; Avi Schroeder; Abigail K R Lytton-Jean; Daniel J Siegwart; Akin Akinc; Carmen Barnes; Scott A Barros; Mary Carioto; Kevin Fitzgerald; Julia Hettinger; Varun Kumar; Tatiana I Novobrantseva; June Qin; William Querbes; Victor Koteliansky; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Oxygen radical-mediated pulmonary toxicity induced by some cationic liposomes.

Authors:  S Dokka; D Toledo; X Shi; V Castranova; Y Rojanasakul
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 8.  Molecular hurdles in polyfectin design and mechanistic background to polycation induced cytotoxicity.

Authors:  A Christy Hunter
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered siRNA via targeted nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mark E Davis; Jonathan E Zuckerman; Chung Hang J Choi; David Seligson; Anthony Tolcher; Christopher A Alabi; Yun Yen; Jeremy D Heidel; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Interfering with disease: a progress report on siRNA-based therapeutics.

Authors:  Antonin de Fougerolles; Hans-Peter Vornlocher; John Maraganore; Judy Lieberman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 84.694

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles for siRNA delivery to primary adipocytes.

Authors:  Alexander C Eldredge; Mark E Johnson; Yang Cao; Lin Zhang; Can Zhao; Zhengxia Liu; Qin Yang; Zhibin Guan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Transfection by cationic gemini lipids and surfactants.

Authors:  M Damen; A J J Groenen; S F M van Dongen; R J M Nolte; B J Scholte; M C Feiters
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.597

3.  Amphiphilic Dendrimer Vectors for RNA Delivery: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Jiaxuan Chen; Dandan Zhu; Xiaoxuan Liu; Ling Peng
Journal:  Acc Mater Res       Date:  2022-05-03

4.  Dendritic peptide-conjugated polymeric nanovectors for non-toxic delivery of plasmid DNA and enhanced non-viral transfection of immune cells.

Authors:  Sijia Yi; Sun-Young Kim; Michael P Vincent; Simseok A Yuk; Sharan Bobbala; Fanfan Du; Evan Alexander Scott
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  Focused Library Approach to Discover Discrete Dipeptide Bolaamphiphiles for siRNA Delivery.

Authors:  Alexander C Eldredge; Mark E Johnson; Nathan J Oldenhuis; Zhibin Guan
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.988

6.  Structure-property relationship for in vitro siRNA delivery performance of cationic 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin: PEG-PPG-PEG polyrotaxane vectors.

Authors:  Vivek D Badwaik; Emilio Aicart; Yawo A Mondjinou; Merrell A Johnson; Valorie D Bowman; David H Thompson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Functionalized Asymmetric Bola-Type Amphiphiles for Efficient Gene and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Zheng Huang; Dong-Mei Zhao; Xuan Deng; Ji Zhang; Yi-Mei Zhang; Xiao-Qi Yu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 5.076

8.  Insight into the binding of a non-toxic, self-assembling aromatic tripeptide with ct-DNA: Spectroscopic and viscositic studies.

Authors:  Soumi Biswas; Satyabrata Samui; Arpita Chakraborty; Sagar Biswas; Debapriya De; Utpal Ghosh; Apurba K Das; Jishu Naskar
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2017-07-08

Review 9.  Biomedically Relevant Applications of Bolaamphiphiles and Bolaamphiphile-Containing Materials.

Authors:  Jake R Hughes; Alyssa S Miller; Camryn E Wallace; Gopi Nath Vemuri; Peter M Iovine
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 10.  Perfluorocarbons in Chemical Biology.

Authors:  Margeaux A Miller; Ellen M Sletten
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.