Development of safe and effective delivery vectors is a critical challenge for the application of RNA interference (RNAi)-based biotechnologies. In this study we show the rational design of a series of novel dendritic peptide bolaamphiphile vectors that demonstrate high efficiency for the delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) while exhibiting low cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity. Systematic investigation into structure-property relationships revealed an important correlation between molecular design, self-assembled nanostructure, and biological activity. The unique bolaamphiphile architecture proved a key factor for improved complex stability and transfection efficiency. The optimal vector contains a fluorocarbon core and exhibited enhanced delivery efficiency to a variety of cell lines and improved serum resistance when compared to hydrocarbon analogues and lipofectamine RNAiMAX. In addition to introducing a promising new vector system for siRNA delivery, the structure-property relationships and "fluorocarbon effect" revealed herein offer critical insight for further development of novel materials for nucleic acid delivery and other biomaterial applications.
Development of safe and effective delivery vectors is a critical challenge for the application of RNA interference (RNAi)-based biotechnologies. In this study we show the rational design of a series of novel dendritic peptide bolaamphiphile vectors that demonstrate high efficiency for the delivery of small interfering RNA (siRNA) while exhibiting low cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity. Systematic investigation into structure-property relationships revealed an important correlation between molecular design, self-assembled nanostructure, and biological activity. The unique bolaamphiphile architecture proved a key factor for improved complex stability and transfection efficiency. The optimal vector contains a fluorocarbon core and exhibited enhanced delivery efficiency to a variety of cell lines and improved serum resistance when compared to hydrocarbon analogues and lipofectamine RNAiMAX. In addition to introducing a promising new vector system for siRNA delivery, the structure-property relationships and "fluorocarbon effect" revealed herein offer critical insight for further development of novel materials for nucleic acid delivery and other biomaterial applications.
Since its discovery,
RNA interference (RNAi) has demonstrated tremendous utility in a variety
of biological applications, including experimental biology,[1] functional genomics,[2] stem cell research,[3] and treatment of
diseases.[4,5] The high potency and specificity of gene
silencing induced by small interfering RNA (siRNA) makes this technology
particularly appealing for medicinal applications; however, safe and
efficient delivery of siRNA into targeted cells remains a major challenge.[5−7] Much effort has been devoted to the development of synthetic delivery
vectors[8] with a variety of systems being
investigated, including lipids,[9−11] peptides,[12−15] polymers,[16−19] dendrimers,[20,21] and gold nanoparticles.[22,23] Cationic lipids (such
as lipofectamine) and polymers (such as poly(ethylene imine), PEI)
have been widely used in a variety of biological studies; however,
toxicity and delivery efficiency are often limiting factors for these
early vectors.[24−26] Recently lipid nanoparticles (LNPs)[8,11,27] and polymeric vectors[16,28] have demonstrated great promise for therapeutic delivery of siRNA
to the liver and solid tumors. Despite major advances, the efficiency
of endosomal escape of most vectors is generally low,[29,30] and interaction of conventional cationic lipids and polymers with
the cell membrane can result in membrane disruption, altered cell
behavior, and cytotoxicity.[24,26,31−33] While combinatorial approaches have proven useful
for the discovery of new vectors,[10,34] a deeper understanding
of how structural parameters affect transfection efficiency, circulatory
stability, serum resistance, and ultimately in vivo efficacy would be of great value for the further development of
synthetic siRNA vectors. Toward this goal, a systematic approach based
on direct structure–activity correlation should advance our
basic understanding and facilitate the rational design of effective
new vectors.Herein we report the rational design of a dendritic
peptide bolaamphiphile for safe and efficient siRNA delivery (Figure ). Unlike regular
lipid-like amphiphiles (termed “mono-amphiphile”), which
are composed of one or more hydrophobic tails and a single hydrophilic
headgroup, bolaamphiphiles (termed “bola”) are dumbbell-shaped
molecules having two hydrophilic headgroups connected via a hydrophobic
core (Figure a,b).[35] In nature, bolaamphiphiles are found in cell
membranes of certain kinds of extremophile archaebacteria with the
monolayer assemblies, as opposed to the bilayer structures of normal
lipids, providing improved stability under harsh conditions.[36] The robust self-assembly of bolaamphiphiles
makes them attractive for biomaterials applications, with several
recent reports of gene delivery using bolaamphiphile-based vectors.[37−40] We envision that the unique molecular architecture of bolas can
be exploited to disfavor insertion into the cell membrane and offer
a more biocompatible alternative to conventional lipids. The use of
a hydrophobic core shorter than the native phospholipid bilayer should
prevent direct membrane insertion due to unfavorable thermodynamics,
with the use of relatively large dendritic headgroups to disfavor
a U-shaped conformation (Figure a).
Figure 1
Design concept and structure of bolaamphiphiles. (a) Schematic
illustration of mono-amphiphile and bolaamphiphile. (b) Design of
dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles. Bolaamphiphiles are composed of
two dendritic peptide headgroups linked to a hydrophobic core by reducible
disulfide linkages. The multifunctional dendritic peptide headgroups
are functionalized with 75 mol % histidine (His) and 25 mol % tryptophan
(Trp) on periphery. (c) Structures of dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles.
The structure of bola-C18-G2 is shown as an example.
The dendritic peptide headgroups range from generation-1 (G1) to generation-3 (G3) dendrons. A series of hydrophobic
cores as shown were used in the structure–property studies.
(d) Structures of three dendritic peptide mono-amphiphiles used for
comparative studies.
Figure 2
Hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity of bolaamphiphiles. (a) Proposed
low membrane disruption character of dendritic bolaamphiphiles in
comparison to mono-amphiphiles. Because of the unique molecular architecture,
bolaamphiphiles should be more difficult to insert into the cell membrane,
causing less membrane disruption. In contrast, mono-amphiphiles can
insert into membrane more easily and cause membrane disruption due
to their structural similarity to native phospholipids. (b) Hemolytic
activity of both mono- and bolaamphiphiles as % hemolysis of bovine
red blood cells. (c) Cytotoxicity of both mono- and bolaamphiphiles
to NIH 3T3 cells as determined by MTT assay.
Design concept and structure of bolaamphiphiles. (a) Schematic
illustration of mono-amphiphile and bolaamphiphile. (b) Design of
dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles. Bolaamphiphiles are composed of
two dendritic peptide headgroups linked to a hydrophobic core by reducible
disulfide linkages. The multifunctional dendritic peptide headgroups
are functionalized with 75 mol % histidine (His) and 25 mol % tryptophan
(Trp) on periphery. (c) Structures of dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles.
The structure of bola-C18-G2 is shown as an example.
The dendritic peptide headgroups range from generation-1 (G1) to generation-3 (G3) dendrons. A series of hydrophobic
cores as shown were used in the structure–property studies.
(d) Structures of three dendritic peptide mono-amphiphiles used for
comparative studies.Hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity of bolaamphiphiles. (a) Proposed
low membrane disruption character of dendritic bolaamphiphiles in
comparison to mono-amphiphiles. Because of the unique molecular architecture,
bolaamphiphiles should be more difficult to insert into the cell membrane,
causing less membrane disruption. In contrast, mono-amphiphiles can
insert into membrane more easily and cause membrane disruption due
to their structural similarity to native phospholipids. (b) Hemolytic
activity of both mono- and bolaamphiphiles as % hemolysis of bovine
red blood cells. (c) Cytotoxicity of both mono- and bolaamphiphiles
to NIH 3T3 cells as determined by MTT assay.The second important design component is
the choice of dendritic headgroup (Figure b,c), for which we chose a lysine-based dendron
functionalized with 75 mol % histidine (His) and 25 mol % tryptophan
(Trp), the optimal combination for our previous dendronized polymer
vector.[41] The dendritic headgroup provides
multivalent interactions for efficient binding of siRNA, with the
size and valency controllable through the use of different dendron
generations. On the basis of our previous study, Trp improves siRNA
binding and cell uptake, while His facilitates endosomal escape due
to the pH-responsive nature of the imidazole ring.[41]The third key component in our bola
design is the hydrophobic core for promoting self-assembly in aqueous
solution. As shown in Figure c, a variety of hydrophobic cores were studied by systematically
changing several molecular parameters such as the length, geometry,
and chemical nature. Given the unique self-assembly properties of
fluorocarbons and previous reports on fluorinated vectors,[42−46] we envisioned that the fluorocarbon linker could promote robust
self-assembly and also impact the cellular uptake, serum stability,
and biodistribution of the complexes. The final design
element is the disulfide linkages (Figure b,c), connecting the dendritic peptide headgroups
to the central hydrophobic core to provide stimuli-responsive intracellular
disassembly of the complexes, facilitating siRNA release in cytosol.[51]
Results and Discussion
A representative
peptide bola structure (bola-C18-G2) is shown in Figure c. The amphiphiles
are named as follows: m- for mono-amphiphile and bola- for bolaamphiphile,
followed by the structure of the hydrophobic core (e.g., C18) and then the generation of the dendron headgroups (e.g., G2). Different hydrophobic cores were investigated, including
hydrocarbon chains of various lengths (C6-C22) and a fluorocarbon core (F10). The length of the hydrophobic
cores was chosen to be significantly shorter than the width of a typical
phospholipid bilayer membrane so that bolas will not be able to span
across the entire bilayer and cause cell membrane disruption. A control
molecule containing a hexa(ethylene glycol) core (HEG) was included as the hydrophilic core should not induce self-assembly
in aqueous solution. A hydrophobic core containing a 1,2,3-triazole
(TZ) was also synthesized to probe the effect of the
kinked backbone. The size of the dendron headgroup was varied from
first to third generation (G1–G3).
For a direct comparison between mono- and bolaamphiphiles, three mono-amphiphile
analogues were synthesized containing either a C11 alkyl tail (m-C11) or one to two oleic acid moieties (m-OA or m-OA2), with the structures shown in Figure d. It should be noted that
linear peptide mono-amphiphiles have been extensively studied for
self-assembly and biomaterials applications.[52,53] All molecules were synthesized by solution-phase coupling reactions,
and detailed synthesis and characterization data can be found in the Supporting Information.Our hypothesis
of low membrane disruption for bolas was first tested by hemolysis
assays. Bovine red blood cells (RBC) were treated with the amphiphiles
at various concentrations, and the release of hemoglobin from the
RBC was measured as an indicator of membrane lytic activity. Supporting
our hypothesis, the mono-amphiphiles exhibited greater hemolytic activity
than the bolas (Figure b). The hydrophobic tail of mono-amphiphiles significantly influenced
their hemolytic activity, as the longer OA amphiphile
exhibited 4 times higher membrane lysis than the shorter C11 amphiphile. The double tailed OA2 amphiphile induced
a relatively high degree of hemolysis at lower concentrations, but
plateaued at higher concentration, possibly due to self-assembly at
higher concentration. In sharp contrast, the C18 bolas
exhibited very low hemolytic activity, with G2 inducing
less than 1% hemolysis and G1 ≈ 3% hemolysis at
250 μg/mL. The higher hemolysis induced by G1 bola
agrees with our proposed headgroup size effect, as the small G1 dendron provides less steric hindrance to the U-shaped
conformation. The different hemolytic activity of these dendron amphiphiles
correlates well with their cytotoxicity. As shown in Figure c, all G2 bolaamphiphiles
are about 2 orders of magnitude less cytotoxic to 3T3 fibroblast cells
than the analogous mono-amphiphiles. The increased cytotoxicity of bola-C18-G3 is presumably due to the higher valency of cationic
charges of the G3 dendron. For comparison, branched PEI
(Mn ≈ 25 kDa), a commonly used
polymer for gene delivery studies, induces much greater toxicity than
both mono- and bolaamphiphiles, further confirming the safety of bolas
for siRNA delivery.The mono- and bolaamphiphiles were screened
for gene silencing activity in NIH 3T3 cells expressing green fluorescent
protein (GFP). Initial transfection and gel electrophoresis experiments
suggested that while most vectors fully complexed siRNA by N/P = 10
(the molar ratio of the charged amines of the vector to the phosphates
of RNA) the knockdown effect was not saturated until N/P = 30–45,
and for all further studies a N/P ratio of 45 was utilized (Figure S1). For comparison to the toxicity and
hemolysis assays, bola-F10-G2 complexes formed at N/P
= 45 with [siRNA] = 100 nM have a vector concentration of 110 μg/mL,
at which no significant toxic effect was observed (Figure c). In general, mono-amphiphiles
showed very little gene silencing with the most efficacious, m-OA2-G2, inducing only ∼25% knockdown (Figure b). In contrast, bolaamphiphiles
containing the fluorocarbon (F10) or hydrocarbon cores
of sufficient length (C18, C22) with G2 or G3 headgroups displayed effective gene
silencing. The introduction of triazole ring in the hydrophobic core
(TZ) did not significantly change the transfection efficiency.
Bolaamphiphiles based on shorter cores (bola-C6-G2 and bola-C12-G2) or bearing G1 headgroups failed
to induce a strong knockdown response (Figure a). The vector containing a hydrophilic linker
(bola-HEG-G2) was completely ineffective at gene silencing,
presumably due to the lack of hydrophobic self-assembly.
Figure 3
Transfection,
TEM imaging, DLS analysis, and gel eletrophoresis of different amphiphile/siRNA
complexes. (a, b) Initial transfection screening of bola- and mono-amphiphiles
in GFP-expressing NIH 3T3 cells. N/P ratio = 45 and [siRNA] = 100
nM. (c–e) Negative-stain TEM (uranyl acetate) images of vector/siRNA
complexes: bola-C18-G1 (c), bola-C18-G2 (d),
and bola-C18-G3 (e), scale bars = 200 nm. (f, g) Cryo-TEM
imaging of bola-C18-G2 in PBS, scale bar = 200 nm (f)
and 100 nm (g). (h) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) particle size and
zeta potential analysis of vector/siRNA complexes prepared at N/P
= 45 in PBS. (i–k) Dextran sulfate competitive binding assay
with different bola complexes (N/P = 45) with the numbers above the
wells indicating the S/P ratio (molar ratio of sulfate on dextran
sulfate to phosphates on siRNA). (l) Triggered siRNA release by reducing
reagent glutathione (GSH). Different bola-G2 complexes
(N/P = 45, named by the core) were treated with GSH (+) or PBS (−)
for 60 min before gel electrophoresis.
Transfection,
TEM imaging, DLS analysis, and gel eletrophoresis of different amphiphile/siRNA
complexes. (a, b) Initial transfection screening of bola- and mono-amphiphiles
in GFP-expressing NIH 3T3 cells. N/P ratio = 45 and [siRNA] = 100
nM. (c–e) Negative-stain TEM (uranyl acetate) images of vector/siRNA
complexes: bola-C18-G1 (c), bola-C18-G2 (d),
and bola-C18-G3 (e), scale bars = 200 nm. (f, g) Cryo-TEM
imaging of bola-C18-G2 in PBS, scale bar = 200 nm (f)
and 100 nm (g). (h) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) particle size and
zeta potential analysis of vector/siRNA complexes prepared at N/P
= 45 in PBS. (i–k) Dextran sulfate competitive binding assay
with different bola complexes (N/P = 45) with the numbers above the
wells indicating the S/P ratio (molar ratio of sulfate on dextran
sulfate to phosphates on siRNA). (l) Triggered siRNA release by reducing
reagent glutathione (GSH). Different bola-G2 complexes
(N/P = 45, named by the core) were treated with GSH (+) or PBS (−)
for 60 min before gel electrophoresis.To understand the correlation between molecular structure
and delivery efficiency, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was
utilized to examine the morphology of different amphiphile/siRNA complexes. Figure c–e displays
TEM images of different bola-C18/siRNA complexes stained
with uranyl acetate, demonstrating that the size of the dendritic
headgroup influences the morphology of the assembled nanostructures
dramatically. The compound with the smallest headgroup, bola-C18-G1, can pack closely to form twisted nanofibers, similar in morphology
to the structures previously reported for well-packed bola assemblies
(Figure c).[35] As the headgroup increases in size, both steric
effects and charge repulsion disfavor the formation of densely packed
nanofibrils, with bola-C18-G2 and bola-C18-G3 complexes appearing as circular features consistent with assembly
into nanoparticles (Figure d,e). The larger headgroup of G3 bolaamphiphiles
further reduces the packing efficiency for the hydrophobic core, resulting
in larger particles than G2 bolaamphiphiles. Complexes
formed using G2 bolaamphiphiles containing fluorocarbon
(F10) or 1,2,3-triazole (TZ) cores also
displayed nanoparticle morphology (Figure S2a–c), as did both mono-amphiphiles containing a single hydrophobic tail
(m-C11-G2, m-OA-G2, Figure S2d,e). The m-OA2-G2 complexes formed
fibrillar structures similar to those observed in the bola-C18-G1 images, potentially due to increased hydrophobic interactions from
the additional oleate tail enhancing the stability of assembly (Figure S2f). Cryo-TEM was further used to observe
the in situ morphology of the vector/siRNA complexes
in PBS with bola-C18-G2 chosen for initial analysis.
The cryo-TEM images of bola-C18-G2 (Figure f,g) complexes were characterized
by nanoparticles with an average diameter of 88 ± 19 nm, which
appear to be composed of smaller “granules” approximately
10–20 nm in diameter. Nanoparticles displaying similar “raspberry”
morphology have been observed for siRNA complexes of the peptide vector
CADY.[47]The particle size and zeta
potential of the complexes were analyzed using dynamic light scattering
(DLS) (Figure h).
Complexes formed from vectors lacking a hydrophobic core or sufficient
length (bola-HEG-G2, bola-C6-G2) did not
provide enough signals for analysis, consistent with a lack of assembly.
The complexes that formed fibrillar assemblies as observed by TEM
(bola-C18-G1, m-OA2-G2) produced scattering
signal, but the data did not correlate when analyzed via standard
methods, possibly due to the formation of irregular aggregates or
fibrillar networks. For both bola-C18 and bola-F10 vectors the particle size of G2 was smaller than that
of the G3, while the particle size decreased with increasing
length of alkyl core from bola-C12-G2, bola-C18-G2, to bola-C22-G2. The trend is consistent with proposed
assembly stability, with smaller headgroup and longer hydrophobic
core condensing siRNA into smaller particles and larger headgroup
and shorter core into larger particles. The zeta potential of the
vector/siRNA complexes was also measured, with all samples displaying
a positive surface charge between 15 and 20 mV. Mono amphiphile/siRNA
complexes, m-C11-G2 and m-OA-G2, showed
similar particle characteristics in DLS, with a slightly larger size
than the bola analogue (bola-C22-G2).In our bola
design, we hypothesized that the more stable nanoparticles formed
by bolaamphiphiles should enhance the siRNA binding strength, which
was assessed via a competitive binding assay using the anionic polymerdextran sulfate (DS, Mn ≈ 25 kDa).
Although m-C11-G2 and bola-C22-G2 have exactly
the same chemical composition, the bola complexes exhibited much higher
stability with little siRNA release up to S/P = 23 (the molar ratio
of sulfate from DS and phosphate from siRNA), while the mono-amphiphile
complex started to release siRNA at S/P = 8 (Figure S3a,b). Furthermore, the proposed self-assembly model agrees
with the stability of different bola complexes. As shown in Figure i–k, despite
having headgroups with the lowest level of multivalency, bola-C18-G1 exhibited the strongest siRNA binding with no siRNA release up to
S/P of 30, presumably due to the stable fibrillar assembly. The vectors bola-C18-G2 and bola-C18-G3, which demonstrated
nanoparticle assembly by TEM, showed siRNA release at the lower S/P
ratios of 23 and 15, respectively. The fluorocarbon vector, bola-F10-G2, demonstrated stronger siRNA binding than the
hydrocarbon analogue bola-C18-G2 with no siRNA release
until S/P = 30 (Figure S3c), again presumably
due to the more robust self-assembly induced by the fluorocarbon core.
The bolaamphiphiles containing either the shortest hydrocarbon (bola-C6-G2) or hydrophilic core (bola-HEG-G2)
failed to effectively complex siRNA (Figure S3e,g). Stimuli-responsive siRNA release from bola complexes was demonstrated
by incubation of the complexes with glutathione (GSH) followed by
subsequent gel electrophoresis, which showed effective decomplexation
for the GSH treated samples (Figure l).The different self-assembly behavior was
corroborated by infrared (IR) spectroscopy. The methylene (CH2) groups in the alkyl region prefer trans conformation in highly ordered packing structure, resulting in lower
frequency for their C–H stretching peaks.[54]Figure S4 shows that from G1 to G3 bola complexes, both the asymmetric
(∼2930 cm–1) and symmetric (∼2850
cm–1) C–H stretch peaks shifted to higher
frequency, indicating less ordered structure in the alkyl region.
This agrees with the proposed self-assembly model, with decreasing
packing order from nanofibril to nanoparticle, caused by the enhanced
electrostatic repulsion and sterics associated with increasing valency
of the cationic dendron.The cellular uptake of amphiphile-siRNA
complexes was investigated by confocal fluorescence microscopy using
Cy3 labeled siRNA (Figure a–d). The mono-amphiphile (m-C11- G2)
complexes showed no cellular uptake with no detectable signal from
Cy3-siRNA (Figure a), while bola-C18-G1/siRNA complexes formed aggregates
on the cell surface and were not internalized (Figure b), in agreement with the observed low gene
knockdown for both of these vectors (Figure a,b). Complexes formed with both bola-C18-G2 and bola-C18-G3 showed significant cellular uptake
of siRNA, with G2 exhibiting higher efficiency (Figure c,d). The Cy3-siRNA
uptake was further quantified by flow cytometry (Figure e–h). Compared to lipofectamine,
Cy3-siRNA complexes with all three mono-amphiphiles showed very low
cellular uptake (Figure e), while bola-C18-G2 and bola-F10-G2 exhibited
20–40 times higher uptake than lipofectamine (Figure f). Bolas with either shorter
alkane cores (C6 and C12) or a hydrophilic HEG core could not form stable complexes, and no cellular
uptake of Cy3-siRNA was detected (Figure f). Notably, cell uptake efficiency was directly
related to the size of headgroup. Both boa-C18-G2 and bola-F10-G2 showed much higher cell uptake than their G3 analogues (Figure g,h), which could be attributed to the higher stability and
smaller size of G2 complexes.
Figure 4
Cell uptake of different
amphiphile/siRNA complexes. Cys3-siRNA was complexed with different
amphiphiles and transfected to NIH 3T3 cells. (a–d) Confocal
fluorescence images of transfected cells (cell nuclei were counter-stained
with DAPI, scale bar: 20 μm). (e, f) Cell uptake of siRNA complexes
with different mono- and bolaamphiphiles quantified by flow cytometry.
(g, h) Cell uptake of G2 and G3 bolaamphiphile
vectors. (i, j) Transfection of Cy3-siRNA complexes carried out at
37 or 4 °C. (k) Transfection of 3T3 cells pretreated with sodium
azide (NaN3) and 2-deoxy-d-glucose (DG). (l, m)
Endocytotic pathway of bola complexes. 3T3 cells were treated with
chlorpromazine (30 μM, inhibitor of clathrin-mediated endocytosis),
genistein (350 μM, inhibitor of caveolar endocytosis), or ethylisopropylamiloride
(EIPA, 30 μM, inhibitor of macropinocytosis) for 1 h before
transfection of Cy3-siRNA/bola complexes.
Cell uptake of different
amphiphile/siRNA complexes. Cys3-siRNA was complexed with different
amphiphiles and transfected to NIH 3T3 cells. (a–d) Confocal
fluorescence images of transfected cells (cell nuclei were counter-stained
with DAPI, scale bar: 20 μm). (e, f) Cell uptake of siRNA complexes
with different mono- and bolaamphiphiles quantified by flow cytometry.
(g, h) Cell uptake of G2 and G3 bolaamphiphile
vectors. (i, j) Transfection of Cy3-siRNA complexes carried out at
37 or 4 °C. (k) Transfection of 3T3 cells pretreated with sodium
azide (NaN3) and 2-deoxy-d-glucose (DG). (l, m)
Endocytotic pathway of bola complexes. 3T3 cells were treated with
chlorpromazine (30 μM, inhibitor of clathrin-mediated endocytosis),
genistein (350 μM, inhibitor of caveolar endocytosis), or ethylisopropylamiloride
(EIPA, 30 μM, inhibitor of macropinocytosis) for 1 h before
transfection of Cy3-siRNA/bola complexes.To further understand the cell uptake process, we chose bola-F10-G2 and bola-F10-G3 as representative
vectors to study the cell uptake pathway. Figure i–k shows that the cell uptake of
bola/Cy3-siRNA complexes are energy dependent, with low temperature
(4 °C) completely shutting down the uptake (Figure i,j) and the metabolic inhibitor
NaN3/2-deoxy-d-glucose inhibiting uptake in a
concentration-dependent manner (Figure k). The cell uptake mechanism was further studied by
using several small molecule inhibitors to specifically block three
common endocytotic pathways: clathrin-mediated endocytosis (chlorpromazine),
caveolar endocytosis (genistein), and macropinocytosis (EIPA).[55,56] As shown in Figure l,m, siRNA/bola-F10-G2 complexes were internalized through
both clathrin-mediated and caveolar pathways. The bola-F10-G3 complexes entered the cell through caveolae-mediated endocytosis
almost exclusively, which can be explained by the larger particle
size of the bola-F10-G3 complexes.[48,49] The clear dependence of cell uptake on inhibitor concentration (Figure S5) further confirms the cellular uptake
pathway.To demonstrate the general efficacy of these vectors,
transfections were carried out in the following luciferase-expressing
cell lines: MDA-MB-231, HEK, INS-1, and 4T1 (Figure a). Similar to the results obtained from
3T3 cells, mono-amphiphile m-C11-G2 did not achieve any
significant gene knockdown and induced substantial toxicity in HEK
and 4T1 cells. In contrast, bolaamphiphiles C18-G2 and F10-G2 both displayed robust luciferase knockdown with minimal
cytotoxicity. Notably, for the 4T1 cell line in which lipofectamine
failed to induce a strong knockdown response, both C18-G2 and F10-G2 effectively silenced luciferase expression.
Figure 5
Transfection
study in different cell lines and in the presence of serum. (a) Luciferase
silencing data for various amphiphiles in different cell lines including
MDA-MB-231, HEK 293, β-INS-1, and 4T1. N/P = 45, [siRNA] = 100
nM, viability measured by MTT assay. (b, c) Dose/response curves of bola-C18-G2 (b) and bola-F10-G2 (c) vectors in
MDA-MB-231 cells. N/P = 45 for all samples, [siRNA] indicated on x-axis. (d) Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells in serum-containing
medium. N/P = 45, [siRNA] = 50 nM, final concentration of fetal bovine
serum (FBS) in antibiotic-free DMEM transfection media indicated on
the x-axis.
Transfection
study in different cell lines and in the presence of serum. (a) Luciferase
silencing data for various amphiphiles in different cell lines including
MDA-MB-231, HEK 293, β-INS-1, and 4T1. N/P = 45, [siRNA] = 100
nM, viability measured by MTT assay. (b, c) Dose/response curves of bola-C18-G2 (b) and bola-F10-G2 (c) vectors in
MDA-MB-231 cells. N/P = 45 for all samples, [siRNA] indicated on x-axis. (d) Transfection of MDA-MB-231 cells in serum-containing
medium. N/P = 45, [siRNA] = 50 nM, final concentration of fetal bovine
serum (FBS) in antibiotic-free DMEM transfection media indicated on
the x-axis.The previously discussed transfection studies used phosphate
buffer (PBS, 10 mM phosphate, 10 mM NaCl, pH = 7.4) for sample preparation
(Figure a,b and Figure a); however, it was
observed during optimization that complexes prepared in OptiMEM induced
significantly higher knockdown at low concentrations than those prepared
in PBS. This optimized protocol was used to further test the transfection
efficiency of the vectors in MDA-MB-231 cells, with dose/response
curves and IC50 values determined for bola-C18-G2, bola-C18-G3, bola-F10-G2, and bola-F10-G3. The fluorocarbon vector bola-F10-G2 demonstrated highly
efficient transfection with an IC50 value of 2.7 nM, while the analogous
hydrocarbon vector, bola-C18-G2, was less effective with
an IC50 of 18.7 nM (Figure b,c). For both C18 and F10 cores, the G3 variants displayed
higher transfection efficiency than the corresponding G2 analogues,
with calculated IC50 values of 1.0 nM and 7.4 nM for bola-F10-G3 and bola-C18-G2, respectively (Figure S6). These results suggest that the fluorocarbon linker
greatly enhanced the delivery efficiency, with both F10 vectors displaying IC50 values ∼7 times lower than the corresponding
hydrocarbon analogues. The toxicity of the bolaamphiphile/siRNA complexes
prepared using OptiMEM was assessed via the MTT assay, with the results
corroborating the previously observed trend of G3 inducing
greater cytotoxicity than G2 for both C18 and F10 linkers (Figure S7).Although typical in vitro transections
are performed in reduced serum or serum-free media, successful transfection
in the presence of negatively charged serum components is critical
for in vivo application. To investigate the serum
stability of our vectors, transfections were performed varying the
final concentration of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in the transfection
media from 0 to 80% (Figure d). While lipofectamine RNAiMAX and bola-C18-G2 were negatively affected even at low serum content, the gene silencing
effects of bola-F10-G2 were not affected by the presence
of up to 80% FBS. The analogous G3 variant, bola-F10-G3, showed a slight decrease in efficacy at higher FBS concentrations,
which can be attributed to less stable assembly and consequentially
weaker siRNA binding due to the larger dendritic headgroup. The improved
serum stability and efficacy of our fluorocarbon bolaamphiphiles compared
to those containing hydrocarbon cores are in agreement with previous
reports on the use of fluorinated lipids for siRNA delivery.[44] With recent reports of fluorination greatly
enhancing DNA transfection efficiency of PAMAM dendrimers,[45,50] we believe this “fluorocarbon effect” may be generally
applicable to other amphiphilic vectors.On the basis of the
data presented in this paper, a structure–property relationship
can be derived for dendritic peptide amphiphiles for siRNA delivery
(Table ). Compared
to the mono-amphiphiles studied, all G2 bolaamphiphiles
of similar length displayed stronger siRNA binding, reduced cytotoxicity,
and greatly enhanced transfection efficiency. The size of the cationic
dendron was observed to have a major influence on the morphology and
biological activity of the complexes, with the fibrillar assemblies
formed by bola-C18-G1 affording dramatically less knockdown
than the nanoparticle bola-C18-G2 and bola-C18-G3 complexes (Table ). While both G2 and G3 bolaamphiphiles
are highly efficient for siRNA transfection, G2 vectors
exhibit much higher serum stability than G3 analogues.
The use of a fluorocarbon, as opposed to hydrocarbon core greatly
enhanced both the transfection efficacy and serum stability of the
complexes, suggesting that further investigation into fluorocarbon-based
vectors may prove particularly fruitful.
Table 1
Structure–Property
Relationship of Dendritic Peptide Amphiphiles for siRNA Delivery
molecular structure
assembly with siRNA
cell uptake
siRNA transfection
serum stability
mono-amphiphiles
nanoparticle/nanofibril
low cell uptake, highly membrane disruptive
low
bolaamphiphile, small headgroup (G1)
nanofibril
aggregate on cell surface,
no uptake
none
bolaamphiphile, medium headgroup
(G2)
smaller nanoparticle
clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis, high cell uptake
high efficiency
high
bolaamphiphile, large headgroup
(G3)
larger nanoparticle
caveolae-mediated endocytosis, low cell uptake
high efficiency
low
Conclusion
With the high siRNA transfection efficiency
in multiple cell lines, excellent serum resistance, and low cytotoxicity
and hemolysis, the dendritic peptide bolaamphiphiles presented in
this study are promising candidates for further gene delivery applications.
Through a rational design approach, we were able to directly link
the molecular structure of different vectors to their assembly morphologies
and the resulting biological activities (Table ). The unique bolaamphiphile architecture
proved a key factor for improved complex stability, low cytotoxicity
and hemolytic activity, and high transfection efficiency. The optimal
vector contains a fluorocarbon core and exhibited enhanced delivery
efficiency to a variety of cell lines and improved serum resistance
when compared to hydrocarbon analogues and lipofectamine RNAiMAX.
The high transfection efficiency of the fluorocarbon vectors and the
direct correlation from molecular structure to self-assembly behavior
to subsequent biologic activity offer critical insight aiding the
rational design of new materials for nucleic acid delivery and other
biomaterial applications.
Methods
Amphiphile/siRNA Complex
Preparation (PBS)
The 5× complex solution for transfection
was prepared by pipet mixing of the amphiphile and siRNA solutions.
In a typical procedure, 1.5 μM siRNA solution was prepared with
PBS buffer (10 mM phosphate, 10 mM NaCl, pH = 7.4). Different amphiphile
solutions (5 mg/mL) were diluted with PBS buffer to a final volume
of 13.3 μL per well. The 13.3 μL of amphiphile solution
was then added to 6.7 μL of 1.5 μM siRNA solution (final
5× siRNA concentration = 500 nM), followed by brief vortexing.
The solution was incubated at room temperature for 30 min before addition
to the cell culture media.
Optimized Complex Preparation (OptiMEM)
The vector/siRNA complexes were prepared by first diluting the
vector to the desired concentration using antibiotic-free OptiMEM.
The siRNA was diluted to 1.5 μM with OptiMEM, and an appropriate
amount of this solution was added to the diluted vector to give a
complex solution with siRNA concentration of 500 nM. After 10 min
incubation, this complex solution was further diluted to the desired
concentration with OptiMEM and used immediately.
Transfection
and Flow Cytometry
NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells were seeded at
a density of 10 000 cells/well in 48-well plates 24 h in advance.
Prior to transfection, the media was replaced with 80 μL of
antibiotic-free DMEM, and 20 μL of the previously described
5× complex solutions were added to each well to give 100 nM final
siRNA concentration. After 4 h incubation, the medium was changed
back to 250 μL of DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
and cultured for another 48 h. Before the analysis, cells were released
from each well by Trypsin and harvested by centrifugation (5 min,
500g). Fluorescence of transfected cells was measured
on a Becton-Dickinson LSR II flow cytometer with argon ion excitation
laser. For each sample, data representing 10 000 objects were
collected as a list-mode file and analyzed using FACSDivaTM software.
The normalized GFP expression was calculated by comparing cells treated
with anti-GFP siRNA complexes to a control sample treated with complexes
prepared with nontargeting siRNA.
Authors: So C Wong; Jason J Klein; Holly L Hamilton; Qili Chu; Christina L Frey; Vladimir S Trubetskoy; Julia Hegge; Darren Wakefield; David B Rozema; David L Lewis Journal: Nucleic Acid Ther Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 5.486
Authors: Yizhou Dong; Kevin T Love; J Robert Dorkin; Sasilada Sirirungruang; Yunlong Zhang; Delai Chen; Roman L Bogorad; Hao Yin; Yi Chen; Arturo J Vegas; Christopher A Alabi; Gaurav Sahay; Karsten T Olejnik; Weiheng Wang; Avi Schroeder; Abigail K R Lytton-Jean; Daniel J Siegwart; Akin Akinc; Carmen Barnes; Scott A Barros; Mary Carioto; Kevin Fitzgerald; Julia Hettinger; Varun Kumar; Tatiana I Novobrantseva; June Qin; William Querbes; Victor Koteliansky; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mark E Davis; Jonathan E Zuckerman; Chung Hang J Choi; David Seligson; Anthony Tolcher; Christopher A Alabi; Yun Yen; Jeremy D Heidel; Antoni Ribas Journal: Nature Date: 2010-03-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Alexander C Eldredge; Mark E Johnson; Yang Cao; Lin Zhang; Can Zhao; Zhengxia Liu; Qin Yang; Zhibin Guan Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Vivek D Badwaik; Emilio Aicart; Yawo A Mondjinou; Merrell A Johnson; Valorie D Bowman; David H Thompson Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 12.479