Literature DB >> 26431532

The Small Molecule DAM Inhibitor, Pyrimidinedione, Disrupts Streptococcus pneumoniae Biofilm Growth In Vitro.

Mukesh Kumar Yadav1, Yoon Young Go2, Sung-Won Chae2, Jae-Jun Song2.   

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae persist in the human nasopharynx within organized biofilms. However, expansion to other tissues may cause severe infections such as pneumonia, otitis media, bacteremia, and meningitis, especially in children and the elderly. Bacteria within biofilms possess increased tolerance to antibiotics and are able to resist host defense systems. Bacteria within biofilms exhibit different physiology, metabolism, and gene expression profiles than planktonic cells. These differences underscore the need to identify alternative therapeutic targets and novel antimicrobial compounds that are effective against pneumococcal biofilms. In bacteria, DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) alters pathogenic gene expression and catalyzes the methylation of adenine in the DNA duplex and of macromolecules during the activated methyl cycle (AMC). In pneumococci, AMC is involved in the biosynthesis of quorum sensing molecules that regulate competence and biofilm formation. In this study, we examine the effect of a small molecule Dam inhibitor, pyrimidinedione, on Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilm formation and evaluate the changes in global gene expression within biofilms via microarray analysis. The effects of pyrimidinedione on in vitro biofilms were studied using a static microtiter plate assay, and the architecture of the biofilms was viewed using confocal and scanning electron microscopy. The cytotoxicity of pyrimidinedione was tested on a human middle ear epithelium cell line by CCK-8. In situ oligonucleotide microarray was used to compare the global gene expression of Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 within biofilms grown in the presence and absence of pyrimidinedione. Real-time RT-PCR was used to study gene expression. Pyrimidinedione inhibits pneumococcal biofilm growth in vitro in a concentration-dependent manner, but it does not inhibit planktonic cell growth. Confocal microscopy analysis revealed the absence of organized biofilms, where cell-clumps were scattered and attached to the bottom of the plate when cells were grown in the presence of pyrimidinedione. Scanning electron microscopy analysis demonstrated the absence of an extracellular polysaccharide matrix in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms compared to control-biofilms. Pyrimidinedione also significantly inhibited MRSA, MSSA, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm growth in vitro. Furthermore, pyrimidinedione does not exhibit eukaryotic cell toxicity. In a microarray analysis, 56 genes were significantly up-regulated and 204 genes were significantly down-regulated. Genes involved in galactose metabolism were exclusively up-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. Genes related to DNA replication, cell division and the cell cycle, pathogenesis, phosphate-specific transport, signal transduction, fatty acid biosynthesis, protein folding, homeostasis, competence, and biofilm formation were down regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. This study demonstrated that the small molecule Dam inhibitor, pyrimidinedione, inhibits pneumococcal biofilm growth in vitro at concentrations that do not inhibit planktonic cell growth and down regulates important metabolic-, virulence-, competence-, and biofilm-related genes. The identification of a small molecule (pyrimidinedione) with S. pneumoniae biofilm-inhibiting capabilities has potential for the development of new compounds that prevent biofilm formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26431532      PMCID: PMC4592238          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) is an important human pathogen. It causes severe and invasive infections, such as pneumonia, septicemia, otitis media, and meningitis, especially in children, the elderly, and immuno-compromised patients [1,2,3]. S. pneumoniae initially colonize the nasopharynx and may persist for months without causing illness, forming specialized structures called biofilms [4,5]. Pneumococci from these biofilms can migrate to other sterile anatomical sites, causing severe biofilm-associated infections such as pneumonia and otitis media [6,7,8]. The planktonic bacteria from these biofilm-associated infections can migrate to other sterile sites, such as the blood stream, causing bacteremia, or to the brain, causing meningitis [9,10,11]. A biofilm is defined as a thin layer of bacteria that adhere to each other and to a living tissue or inert surfaces. These bacteria are surrounded by a self-produced polymeric matrix composed of polysaccharides, proteins, and nucleic acids [12]. Bacteria within biofilms possess increased tolerance to antibiotics and are able to resist host defense systems [13,14]. S. pneumoniae biofilms show increased resistance to common antibiotics, such as penicillin, tetracycline, rifampicin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, levofloxacin, and gentamicin both in vivo and in vitro [15,16,17]. Bacteria within biofilms exhibit altered physiology, metabolism, and gene expression profiles compared to free-floating planktonic cells [18]. Therefore, existing antimicrobial compounds mainly developed to target planktonic bacteria may not be as effective against biofilms. Moreover, the emergence of antibiotic resistant pneumococcal strains necessitates the identification of alternative drug targets and new antimicrobial compounds that could be effective against pneumococcal biofilms. Effective anti-biofilm strategies could inhibit initial bacterial attachment and colonization, interfere with signaling pathways important for biofilm development, or disrupt the biofilm matrix [19,20,21]. Bacterial DNA methyltransferases are generally associated with restriction-modification systems, with the exception of DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) and cell cycle-regulated methyltransferase (CcrM) [22]. In bacteria, Dam alters the expression of pathogenic genes involved in several cellular activities, including mismatch repair, initiation of chromosomal replication, DNA segregation, and transposition [23,24]. In bacteria the Dam enzyme catalyzes a methyl group transfer from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) to the N6 position of adenine in duplex DNA (Fig 1A). This adenine methylation is unique in bacteria. Therefore, these bacterial enzymes represent excellent antimicrobial target candidates. Moreover, SAM-mediated methylation is an important process in pneumococci, leading to the methylation of DNA and macromolecules, as well as the biosynthesis of quorum sensing (QS) molecules and secondary metabolites, such as polyamine, that play roles in biofilm formation [25,26]. Our previous study showed that 5-azacytidine, a hypo-methylating compound, and sinefungin, a SAM analogue, inhibit S. pneumoniae biofilm growth [27,28]. However, the effect of Dam inhibitor small molecule on pneumococcal biofilm formation has not been studied.
Fig 1

(A) Methyl group transfer from SAM to deoxyadenosine by DNA adenine methyltransferases (Dam). (B) The chemical structure of the small molecule inhibitor, pyrimidinedione.

In the present study, we examine the effect of a small molecule Dam inhibitor, pyrimidinedione, on S. pneumoniae biofilms, evaluating changes in global gene expression via microarray analysis. The small molecule pyrimidinedione,1-(4 bromophenyl)-5-(2-furylmethylene)-3-phenyl-2-thioxodihydro-4, 6 (1H,5H)-pyrimidinedione, was reported to be an effective bacterial Dam and CcrM inhibitor. It binds to the ternary enzyme:DNA:AdoMet complex and prevents Dam activity [29]. Our results demonstrated that pyrimidinedione inhibited pneumococcal biofilm growth in vitro at concentrations that did not inhibit planktonic cell growth, and it down-regulated the expression of important metabolic-, virulence-, competence-, and biofilm-related genes. Pyrimidinedione is also effective against MSSA, MRSA, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in vitro, and it is not cytotoxic to eukaryotic cells. The identification of a small molecule (pyrimidinedione) with S. pneumoniae biofilm-inhibiting capabilities has potential for the development of new compounds that prevent biofilm formation.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea University, Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. The human middle ear epithelium cell (HMEEC) line used in this study was kindly provided by Dr. David J. Lim (House Ear Institute, LA, USA). Pre-made blood agar plates (BAPs) containing 5% v/v sheep blood were purchased from Shin Yang chemicals Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Korea).

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

S. pneumoniae serotype 2 (D39 strain; NCTC 7466) was purchased from Health Protection Agency Culture Collections (HPA, Salisbury, UK), serotype 3 (ATCC strain 6303) and serotype 19 (ATCC strain 49619) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). S. pneumoniae serotype 11 (strain 7101975) was obtained from the infectious disease department of Korea University Medical Center, Guro Hospital, Seoul). Bacteria were routinely grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB; BD Difco; Detroit, MI, USA) or on BAPs supplemented with 5% v/v sheep blood at 37°C in 5% atmospheric CO2. Five methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains (CCARM 3108, CCARM 3807, CCARM 3912, CCARM 3903, and CCARM 3967) were purchased from Culture Collection of Antimicrobial Resistant Microbes (CCARM; Seoul, Korea). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, ATCC 29213) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984) were purchased from ATCC. The small molecule inhibitor (here called pyrimidinedione) 1-(4 bromophenyl)-5-(2-furylmethylene)-3-phenyl-2-thioxodihydro-4, 6 (1H,5H)-pyrimidinedione, was purchased from ChemBridge, USA(catalogue number sc5309471; Fig 1B). A stock solution of pyrimidinedione was prepared in DMSO.

Growth curve of S. pneumoniae D39 with pyrimidinedione

Cultures of S. pneumoniae D39 were grown in the presence of 1 and 10 μM/ml concentrations of pyrimidinedione in a time course experiment. The cell suspensions were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2, and the optical density at 600nm (OD600) was measured with a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax plus, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at different time points (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10h). The experiments were performed in replicates of five and were repeated three times to obtain statistical significance.

Effect of pyrimidinedione on in vitro biofilm growth

S. pneumoniae and Staphylococcus biofilm formation experiments were carried out using a static model in 96-well or 24-well microtiter plates [18,30]. Briefly, bacterial colonies grown overnight on blood agar were scraped and seeded in broth (TSB medium) and further grown until mid-logarithmic phase (1×108 cfu/ml). Bacterial cells were diluted 1:1000 in fresh broth, and 200μl or 1 ml cell suspension was used to inoculate a 96- or 24-well microtiter plate. Plates were then incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. Pyrimidinedione was added to each plate, as indicated. Control samples did not contain any supplement, and DMSO-control samples contained 0.01% DMSO (final concentration). After incubation, the medium and planktonic cells were discarded, and the plates were washed three times with sterile PBS. The plates were air dried for 15 min and stained with crystal violet (CV; 0.1%) for 15 min. The CV stain was removed and the plates were washed again. The stained biofilm was dissolved in 95% ethanol, and the OD570 was measured in an automatic spectrophotometer. All experiments were performed with five replicates, and the average was calculated. To quantify the bacteria within biofilms, plates inoculated as described above were washed, and adherent biofilms were dissolved in sterile water via sonication for 10 s. One hundred micro-liter samples were serially diluted, plated on blood agar plates, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. After incubation, bacterial colonies were counted and cfu/ml was determined. Planktonic cells (cells in the biofilm supernatant) were counted in a similar manner.

Effect of pyrimidinedione concentration on biofilm growth

S. pneumoniae (serotypes 2, 3, 19, and 11) biofilms were grown in different concentrations of pyrimidinedione (0.5–10 μM/ml) for 15 h, as previously described. Biofilm biomass was measured using the CV-microtiter plate method. Cfu counts of bacteria within biofilms (D39 strain) were conducted as described above. The percent decrease in biofilm biomass was calculated by subtracting the biomass of DMSO-control samples. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of pyrimidinedione was determined as the concentration corresponding to 50% of the maximum biofilm inhibition with respect to DMSO-control biofilms. At each pyrimidinedione concentration, cells suspended within the biofilm supernatant were collected and analyzed. Bacterial growth was detected by measuring optical density at 600nm (OD600), and cfu of planktonic bacteria in the biofilm supernatant of D39 were counted. To determine whether the biofilm-inhibiting effects of pyrimidinedione extended beyond S. pneumoniae, pyrimidinedione was tested on other biofilm-forming microbial pathogens, such as MSSA, MRSA, and S. epidermidis. Staphylococcus 24 h biofilm assays were carried out in a similar manner as described above, in TSB medium supplied with 1, 5, and 10 μM/ml pyrimidinedione.

Effect of pyrimidinedione on biofilms grown at different time points

In vitro S. pneumoniae biofilm growth varies at different time points. Therefore, we analyzed the effects of pyrimidinedione on S. pneumoniae D39 biofilms at different time points in vitro. S. pneumoniae biofilm was grown at different concentrations of pyrimidinedione [0 (DMSO control), 0.5, 1, 5, and 10 μM/ml] for 5, 10, 15, and 20 h.

Effect of pyrimidinedione on established biofilms

To analyze the inhibitory effects of pyrimidinedione on established biofilms, S. pneumoniae D39 biofilms were grown for 15 h. These established biofilms were then treated with different concentrations (1−400μM/ml) of pyrimidinedione and further incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 6 h. The biofilms were washed, and the biofilm biomass was detected by CV-microtiter plate assay.

Visualization of pneumococcal (D39 strain) biofilm growth by confocal microscopy

In vitro biofilm growth, with and without pyrimidinedione, was analyzed by confocal microscopy. Biofilms were grown on microdiscs for 15 h with 7μM/ml pyrimidinedione and stained using LIVE/DEAD Biofilm Viability staining kit (Invitrogen). A control sample was grown with 0.01% DMSO (final concentration). Biofilms were examined with a Nikon A1 confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., NY, USA) using fluoresce in (green) and Texas red (red) band pass filter sets. The live bacteria with intact cell membranes appear green, and those with damaged membranes appear red.

Visualization of biofilm morphology by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Pneumococcal (D39 strain) biofilms grown with 7μM/ml pyrimidinedione in 24-well tissue culture plates for 15 h were analyzed by SEM. The control sample was grown in 0.01% DMSO. Planktonic cells were removed, and the plates were gently washed twice with sterile PBS (pH 7.4). The samples were pre-fixed for 2 h in a 2% glutaraldehyde and paraformaldehyde solution, followed by 2 h post-fixation in 1% osmic acid. The samples were then treated with a graded series of ethanol (from 60% to 100%), washed three times with t-butyl alcohol, and were then immersed in t-butyl solution at -20°C. The samples were dried in a freeze dryer (ES-2030, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and platinum coated using an IB-5 ion coater (Eiko, Kanagawa, Japan). The samples were visualized using a S-4700 field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi).

Effect of pyrimidinedione on biofilm global gene expression

In situ synthesis of oligonucleotide microarrays was used to compare global gene expressions between the S. pneumoniae D39 strain within biofilms grown in the presence and absence of pyrimidinedione. Biofilms were grown with 7 μM/ml pyrimidinedione, as described above, in 24-well plates and washed with sterile water. The adherent biofilm cells at the bottom and side of plate were scraped, pelleted, and subjected to lysozyme 100 μl (3 mg/ml) treatment for 4 min. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Total RNA Isolation System Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacture’s protocol. Contaminated genomic DNA was removed on a column by RNAase-free DNAse (Qiagen) treatment at 20–25°C for 10 min. RNA was quantified by Nano-Drop, and its integrity was checked by capillary electrophoresis using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). cRNA probes synthesis and hybridization were performed using a Low Input Quick Amp WT Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies USA) as per manufacture’s protocol. Briefly, 100ng total RNA was mixed with WT primer mix and incubated for 10 min at 65°C. A cDNA master mix (0.1M DTT, 5X first strand buffer, RNase-Out, 10mM dNTP mix, and MMLV-RT) was prepared separately, and mixed with the RNA with WT primers mix and incubated at 40°C for 2 h and thereafter at 70°C for 10min. Transcription of dsDNA was performed by adding the transcription master mix (NTP mix, 4X transcription buffer, 50% PEG, 0.1 M DTT, RNase-Out, T7-RNA polymerase, inorganic pyrophosphatase, and cyanine 5-CTP) to the dsDNA reaction samples and incubating the samples at 40°C for 2 h. Amplified and labeled cRNA was purified on RNase mini columns (Qiagen) and quantified using a spectrophotometer. The cyanine 5-labeled cRNA mix was fragmented by incubating at 60°C for 30 min with 10X blocking agent and 25X fragmentation buffer. The fragmented cRNA were dissolved in 2X hybridization buffer and pipetted on the assembled Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 (MYcroarray.com) 6× 7k Microarray. The hybridization reaction was performed in hybridization oven at 57°C for 17 h and the arrays were washed as per manufacturer’s instructions. Hybridization images were analyzed with DNA Microarray Scanner (Agilent Technologies) and the data quantification was performed using Agilent Feature Extraction Software version 10.7 (Agilent Technologies). The average fluorescence intensity for each spot was calculated, and the local background was subtracted. All data normalization and the selection of differentially expressed genes were performed using GenoWiz 4.0 (Ocimum Biosolutions, India). Genes were filtered by removing flag-out genes from each experiment. Global normalization was performed. The average normalized signal channel intensities were divided by the average normalized control channel intensities to calculate the average normalization ratio. Microarray experiments were performed in three biological replicates. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. A 1.4-fold change in each gene, and in each microarray experiment, was considered significant and was included in the final results. The functional annotation (molecular and biological function) and gene ontology of the two sets of differentially expressed genes were determined using the UniPortKB database (http://www.uniport.org/uniport/P0A4M0) and STRING version 9.1. Microarray data were deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/linking.html) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE65339.

Quantification of gene expression by real-time RT-PCR

Microarray gene expression results were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR. Thirteen differentially expressed genes, along with the control gyrB gene, were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. The primers used are shown in Table 1. cDNA amplification was carried out with real-time PCR in a reaction mixture of 20 μl (total volume). The reaction mixture consisted of 10 μl 2× SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA), 3 pmol of each forward and reverse primers, and 4 μl cDNA. The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of DNA denaturation for 15 s at 95°C, primer annealing for 10 s at 56°C, and extension for 15 s at 72°C; and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. To verify that cDNA samples were not contaminated with genomic DNA, a control reaction where no reverse transcriptase was added was included in each RT-PCR experiment. The relative quantification of gene expression was performed using the 2–ΔΔCT method as described elsewhere [31]. Gene expression normalization was performed using a housekeeping gene, gyrB, and the standard condition was a biofilm grown without pyrimidinedione.
Table 1

List of primers used in this study.

Gene namePrimer sequenceBase-pairs
purC F-GACTGCTTTCAACGGTGTCA20
R-ACACCAGCCGCATTTAATTT20
capD F- AAGCAGGTTTTCTGGGGAAT20
R-ACAGGAAGGCCAAACTCGTA20
adk F- AGGGAACTCAAGCAGCAAAA20
R-CAGGAACCAATTCACCCTTG20
lacG-2 F- ACTAGCTGGTTCGGCAGTGT20
R-GCTTATCAAGCAGAAGGTGCT21
lacT F- CAAGCGGAACATCTTTGAGA20
R-GATTGCATTCGGAAAAAGGA20
galT-1 F- TGCTCCTAAACATTCCTTTTCC22
R- TCCGATGAAAATGACCTGAA20
cglD F- CTGATGGTGCCTGAATTCCT20
R- GAAACCCAAAAACGCAGTGT20
nrdG F- CAAGAATGGAAAAGCGAGGA20
R-AACATCCCTCGCAGTGAAAC20
fabD F- GGATGGGACGGGATTTCTAT20
R- GCGGGTCTGATTGAGTTTGT20
dnaK F- AAAATCATCGCAAACCCAGA20
R- GTGACTGCTTGACGTTTTGC20
pstB F-TAACCGGATGAACGATTTGG20
R-ACCATCCCTACACGCTTACG20
phoU F-GGGCAACTTGTCCTTGAAAC20
R-TTCGATAGCGCTTTGACCTT20
acpP F-GGACGCAGATTCATTGGACT20
R-CGTAAGCAACCAAGTCACCA20

Evaluation of pyrimidinedione-mediated eukaryotic cellular cytotoxicity by Cell-Counting Kit (CCK-8)

The cytotoxicity of pyrimidinedione was tested on the human middle ear epithelium cell (HMEEC) line using a CCK-8 kit (Dojindo, MD, USA). HMEECs were kindly provided by Dr. David J. Lim (House Ear Institute, LA, USA) and were maintained in DMEM and BEBM medium (1:1) with required supplements [32,33]. HMEECs (1×104 /well) were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated at 37°C overnight in presence of 5% CO2. After overnight culture, HMEECs were treated with pyrimidinedione (1, 5, or 10 μM/ml) for 24 h in triplicate. Positive and negative control wells were supplemented with 0.01% DMSO (final concentration) or 2% Triton X-100, respectively. After incubation, 10 μl CCK8 solution was added to each well, and the cells were incubated for a further 2–3 h. Mitochondrial dehydrogenase within the cells reduced CCK8 solution to a yellow product called formazan. The amount of formazan produced in the reaction sample is positively correlated with cell viability. Absorbance at 450nm was measured using a microplate reader.

Statistical analysis

Individual experiments were carried out in triplicates or five-replicates, and mean values were calculated. The mean value differences were assessed by Student’s t-test, and the statistical significance was set at a p-value of less than 0.05.

Results

Growth curve of S. pneumoniae supplemented with pyrimidinedione

The planktonic cell growth of S. pneumoniae D39 in the presence of pyrimidinedione (1μM/ml or 10 μM/ml) was not significantly inhibited during the time course experiment. At 6 h incubation, 12% of the cells were inhibited, however, at stationary phase (10 h post-inoculation), planktonic cell growth was not inhibited (Fig 2). This result indicated that pyrimidinedione is partially bacteriostatic, and it has no effect on final bacteria planktonic growth.
Fig 2

Growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae (D39) at different time points and with different concentrations of pyrimidinedione.

Pneumococcal cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2, and growth was detected by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (SD).

Growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae (D39) at different time points and with different concentrations of pyrimidinedione.

Pneumococcal cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2, and growth was detected by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (SD).

Pyrimidinedione inhibits S. pneumoniae (serotype 2, 3, 19 and 11) biofilm growth in vitro

Addition of pyrimidinedione inhibited pneumococcal biofilm growth in vitro. A significant decrease (p<0.05) in biofilm biomass of S. pneumoniae serotypes 2, 3, 19, and 11 were detected in biofilms grown in the presence of pyrimidinedione (Fig 3A). The inhibitory effects of pyrimidinedione was concentration dependent, and the calculated EC50 (S. pneumoniae D39) was 1 μM. Addition of 1 μM/ml pyrimidinedione significantly decreased S. pneumoniae D39 biofilm biomass by 54% (p< 0.05, Fig 3A) and cfu counts by 83% (p< 0.05, Fig 3B) in comparison to DMSO-control biofilms. However, the planktonic cell growth of S. pneumoniae serotypes 2, 3, 19, and 11 in the presence of pyrimidinedione was not significantly decreased (Fig 3C). Similarly, no significant decrease in planktonic bacterial cfu counts was detected in the D39 strain (Fig 3D). This result indicated that pyrimidinedione significantly inhibits biofilm growth but has no effect on planktonic growth. The inhibitory effect of pyrimidinedione was significant in all S. pneumoniae serotypes tested, indicating that the inhibitory effect of pyrimidinedione was independent of serotypes, and the application of this molecule could be extent to other serotypes biofilms as well. Pyrimidinedione significantly inhibited in vitro MSSA, MRSA, and S. epidermidis biofilm growth in a dose-dependent manner, similar to that observed in pneumococci (Fig 4). S. epidermidis, MSSA 29213 and MRSA CCARM 3903 are strong biofilm producing strains. 1 μM/ml concentration of pyrimidinedione significantly (p< 0.05) decreased biofilm biomass of S. epidermidis, MSSA 29213 and MRSA 3903 by 50, 55 and 53% respectively. This indicates that pyrimidinedione is equally effective against both antibiotic resistance and sensitive strong biofilm producing staphylococcus.
Fig 3

In vitro S. Pneumoniae biofilm and planktonic cell growth at different pyrimidinedione concentrations at 15 h.

(A) Detection of S. pneumoniae serotypes 2, 3, 19, and 11 biofilm biomasses by CV-microtiter plate assay. (B) Cfu counts of S. pneumoniae D39 biofilms. (C) Planktonic cell growth detected of S. pneumoniae (serotype 2, 3, 19 and 11) by measuring optical density at 600 nm. (D) Cfu counts of S. pneumoniae D39 planktonic cell growth. The results were compared by Student’s t-test (*corresponds to p< 0.05, **corresponds to p< 0.005). The error bars represent the SD.

Fig 4

MRSA, MSSA, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm growth in vitro at different concentrations of pyrimidinedione at 24 h.

The biofilm biomass was detected by CV-microtiter plate method. The results were compared by Student’s t-test (*corresponds to p< 0.05, **corresponds to p< 0.005). The error bars represent the SD.

In vitro S. Pneumoniae biofilm and planktonic cell growth at different pyrimidinedione concentrations at 15 h.

(A) Detection of S. pneumoniae serotypes 2, 3, 19, and 11 biofilm biomasses by CV-microtiter plate assay. (B) Cfu counts of S. pneumoniae D39 biofilms. (C) Planktonic cell growth detected of S. pneumoniae (serotype 2, 3, 19 and 11) by measuring optical density at 600 nm. (D) Cfu counts of S. pneumoniae D39 planktonic cell growth. The results were compared by Student’s t-test (*corresponds to p< 0.05, **corresponds to p< 0.005). The error bars represent the SD.

MRSA, MSSA, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm growth in vitro at different concentrations of pyrimidinedione at 24 h.

The biofilm biomass was detected by CV-microtiter plate method. The results were compared by Student’s t-test (*corresponds to p< 0.05, **corresponds to p< 0.005). The error bars represent the SD.

Pyrimidinedione inhibits S. pneumoniae D39 biofilm growth at both early and late stages

The growth of biofilms under different pyrimidinedione conditions was inhibited at each time point analyzed. A dose-dependent decrease in biofilm biomass was detected in biofilms grown with pyrimidinedione compared to DMSO-control samples (Fig 5). In the DMSO control, there was an increase in biofilm growth at 5 h of incubation, maximal growth occurred at 10 h of incubation, and then biofilm growth declined. A 70% decrease in biofilm growth was observed with the addition of 5 μM pyrimidinedione at 10 h of incubation. These results indicated that pyrimidinedione is an effective inhibitor of S. pneumoniae biofilm growth in vitro at both early (5 h) and late (20 h) stages.
Fig 5

S. pneumoniae D39 biofilms grown at different concentrations of pyrimidinedione over time.

Biofilm biomass was detected by CV-microtiter plate assay. The results were compared by Student’s t-test (* corresponds to p< 0.05, ** corresponds to p< 0.01). The error bars represent the SD.

S. pneumoniae D39 biofilms grown at different concentrations of pyrimidinedione over time.

Biofilm biomass was detected by CV-microtiter plate assay. The results were compared by Student’s t-test (* corresponds to p< 0.05, ** corresponds to p< 0.01). The error bars represent the SD.

Pyrimidinedione has no effect on established biofilm biomass

Established S. pneumoniae biofilms were treated with different concentrations of pyrimidinedione. Biofilm quantification by CV-microtiter plate assay demonstrated no significant decrease in biofilm biomass following a 6-h treatment with pyrimidinedione (Fig 6A). There was also no difference observed in cfu counts between control and pyrimidinedione-treated biofilms (Fig 6B). This indicates that pyrimidinedione is unable to dismantle biofilms or kill bacteria within biofilms. Hence, this small molecule cannot eradicate an established biofilm.
Fig 6

Effects of pyrimidinedione on established biofilms.

Established S. pneumoniae D39 biofilms were treated with different concentrations of pyrimidinedione. (A) Biofilm biomasses were measured by CV-microtiter plate assay. (B) Cfu counts of biofilms. The error bars represent the SD.

Effects of pyrimidinedione on established biofilms.

Established S. pneumoniae D39 biofilms were treated with different concentrations of pyrimidinedione. (A) Biofilm biomasses were measured by CV-microtiter plate assay. (B) Cfu counts of biofilms. The error bars represent the SD.

Visualization of biofilm growth by confocal microscopy

Confocal microscopy analysis revealed a significant difference in the morphology of biofilms grown in the presence of pyrimidinedione compared to control biofilms (DMSO alone). Control biofilms were compact, thick, and had a well-organized three-dimensional structure (Fig 7A & 7B). In contrast, biofilms grown with pyrimidinedione were thin, the cells were scattered and attached to the bottom of disc, and their three-dimensional structure was not well organized (Fig 7B & 7D). This strongly suggested that pyrimidinedione inhibits biofilm growth and the formation of organized structures.
Fig 7

Confocal microscopic images of Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 biofilms grown with and without pyrimidinedione.

(A & B) Representative confocal images of a control sample. The biofilms in the control sample were thick with an organized 3-dimesional structure. (C & D) Representative confocal images of biofilms grown with 7 μM/ml pyrimidinedione. The pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms were thin and disorganized, with clumps of cells attached to the bottom of plate.

Confocal microscopic images of Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 biofilms grown with and without pyrimidinedione.

(A & B) Representative confocal images of a control sample. The biofilms in the control sample were thick with an organized 3-dimesional structure. (C & D) Representative confocal images of biofilms grown with 7 μM/ml pyrimidinedione. The pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms were thin and disorganized, with clumps of cells attached to the bottom of plate.

Visualization of biofilm morphology by scanning electron microscopy

SEM analysis revealed that control biofilms (DMSO-control) were thick, organized, and heterogeneous with micro-colonies. The cells were surrounded by extracellular matrix and were connected to the bottom of the plate and to each other, forming a three-dimensional organized biofilm structure of significant depth (Fig 8A, 8B, 8C & 8D). The extracellular polysaccharide matrix (EPS) was clearly visible on the cell surface (Fig 8D, arrow). In contrast, pyrimidinedione-exposed biofilms were thin, disorganized, and devoid of micro-colonies. Cells were attached only to the base of the plate, while cell-cell adherence was absent (Fig 8E, 8F, 8G & 8H). The cell surfaces were smooth and devoid of matrix and EPS. These results indicated that in presence of pyrimidinedione, pneumococci were unable to form an organized biofilm.
Fig 8

SEM images of Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 biofilms grown with and without pyrimidinedione.

(A, B, C & D) Representative SEM images of control biofilms. (E, F, G & H) Representative SEM images of biofilms grown with 7 μM/ml pyrimidinedione. The SEM image scale bar corresponds to 50, 10, 5, and 3 μm (from left to right.)

SEM images of Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 biofilms grown with and without pyrimidinedione.

(A, B, C & D) Representative SEM images of control biofilms. (E, F, G & H) Representative SEM images of biofilms grown with 7 μM/ml pyrimidinedione. The SEM image scale bar corresponds to 50, 10, 5, and 3 μm (from left to right.) Upon microarray analysis, it was determined that the expression of 56 S. pneumoniae genes was significantly (p< 0.05) up-regulated, while expression of 204 genes was significantly (p< 0.05) down-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms, as compared to controls. Among the 56 up-regulated genes, 22 encoded uncharacterized and hypothetical proteins, and 34 encoded functional proteins (Table 2). Of the 204 down-regulated genes, 45 encoded hypothetical proteins and 159 encoded functional proteins (Table 3). Genes involved in some functional protein categories were exclusively down-regulated or up-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms (Fig 9).
Table 2

Genes up-regulated in pneumococcal biofilms grown with pyrimidinedione.

Gene locus/nameProteinMolecule functionBiological processMean fold change in expression (p-value)
Purine nucleotide biosynthetic process
SPD_0051 (purC)phosphoribosylaminoimidazole-succinocarboxamideATP binding/phosphoribosylaminoimidazolesuccinocarboxamide synthase activity'de novo' IMP biosynthetic process2.3 0.03)
Carbohydrate metabolism
SPD_0940UDP-N-acetyl-D-mannosaminuronic acidNAD bindingSource: InterPro/ 3. oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH-OH group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptorpolysaccharide biosynthetic process4.8 (0.01)
SPD_0236 (talc)transaldolase, putativesedoheptulose-7-phosphate:D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate glyceronetransferase activitypentose-phosphate shunt1.4 (0.01)
SPD_1046 (lacG-2)6-phospho-beta-galactosidase6-phospho-beta-galactosidase activitylactose catabolic process via tagatose-6-phosphate5.3 (0.01)
SPD_1053 (lacA)galactose-6-phosphate isomerase, LacA subunitgalactose-6-phosphate isomerase activitygalactose catabolic process1.4 (0.04)
SPD_1050 (lacD)tagatose 1,6-diphosphate aldolasetagatose-bisphosphate aldolase activitylactose catabolic process via tagatose-6-phosphate1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1051 (lacC)tagatose-6-phosphate kinasetagatose-6-phosphate kinase activitylactose catabolic process via tagatose-6-phosphate1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1613 (galT-1)galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferaseUDP-glucose:hexose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase activitygalactose metabolic process3.5 (0.03)
SPD_1612 (galE-2)UDP-glucose 4-epimerasecoenzyme bindinggalactose metabolic process1.4 (0.01)
SPD_1052 (lacB)galactose-6-phosphate isomerase, LacB subunitgalactose-6-phosphate isomerase activitygalactose catabolic process1.4 (0.01)
Transport
SPD_0234PTS system, IIC componentprotein-N(PI)-phosphohistidine-sugar phosphotransferase activityphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system1.4 (0.04)
SPD_1048 (lacF-2)PTS system, lactose-specific IIA componenttransferase activityphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system2.6 (0.01)
SPD_1047 (lacE-2)PTS system, lactose-specific IIBC componentsprotein-N(PI)-phosphohistidine-lactose phosphotransferase system transporter activityphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system3.9 (0.03)
clgD (SPD_1860)competence protein CglDCompetence-related DNA transformation transporter (DNA-T) core componentsCompetence-related DNA transformation transporter (DNA-T) core components 1.7 (0.03)
potD (SPD_1218)spermidine/putrescine ABC transporter,polyamine bindingpolyamine transport1.4 (0.04)
Response stress
SPD_0286glutathione peroxidaseglutathione peroxidase activityresponse to oxidative stress1.3 (0.04)
SPD_1287 (trxB)thioredoxin-disulfide reductaseflavin adenine dinucleotide bindingremoval of superoxide radicals1.5 (0.05)
Transcription and DNA binding
SPD_0280transcriptional regulator, putativeprotein-N(PI)-phosphohistidine-sugar phosphotransferase activityregulation of transcription, DNA-templated1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1798DNA-binding response regulatorDNA binding/sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activitytranscription, DNA-templated/phosphorelay signal transduction system1.5 (0.03)
SPD_1947transcriptional regulator, putativesequence-specific DNA binding3.5 (0.05)
SPD_0352DNA-binding response regulatorsequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activitytranscription, DNA-templated1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1049 (lacT)transcription antiterminator LacTRNA bindingregulation of transcription, DNA-templated3.4 (0.01)
Nucleic acid phosphodiester bond hydrolysis
SPD_0662endonuclease/exonuclease/phosphatase familyendonuclease activityNot available1.5 (0.01)
Translation
SPD_0494 (valS)valyl-tRNA synthetaseaminoacyl-tRNA editing activityvalyl-tRNA aminoacylation1.7 (0.05)
SPD_0757 (rpsA)ribosomal protein S1RNA bindingtranslation1.4 (0.06)
SPD_0777 (thiI)thiamine biosynthesis/tRNA modification proteintRNA adenylyltransferase activitythiamine biosynthetic process1.4 (0.02)
Hydrolase activity
SPD_1061serine/threonine protein phosphatasehydrolase activity1.4 (0.04)
SPD_1105 (Rnc)ribonuclease IIIribonuclease III activity/rRNA binding/Endonuclease, Hydrolase, NucleasemRNA processing, rRNA processing, tRNA processing1.4 (0.01)
SPD_0266Cof family proteinhydrolase activityNot available1.4 (0.02)
SPD_1180CAAX amino terminal protease family proteinpeptidase activity3.5 (0.04)
One carbon metabolic process
SPD_1087 (Fhs)formate—tetrahydrofolate ligaseformate-tetrahydrofolate ligase activityfolic acid-containing compound biosynthetic process1.5 (0.03)
Membrane protein
SPD_1213membrane protein, putative1.7 (0.05)
Signal transduction system
SPD_1799sensor histidine kinase, putativephosphorelay sensor kinase activity1.4 (0.04)
Nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
SPD_0214 (Adk)adenylate kinaseadenylate kinase activityAMP salvage2.7 (0.05)
Hypothetical proteins
SPD_1945membrane protein, putative3.0 (0.02)
SPD_0056vanZ protein, putative2.9 (0.04)
SPD_0935Tn5252, Orf 9 protein3.0 (0.05)
SPD_0023conserved hypothetical protein2.2 (0.05)
SPD_0094conserved hypothetical protein1.4 (0.02)
SPD_0668conserved hypothetical protein2.2 (0.05)
SPD_0796conserved hypothetical protein1.5 (0.03)
SPD_0829conserved hypothetical protein4.0 (0.05)
SPD_0831conserved domain protein7.3 (0.03)
SPD_0923conserved hypothetical protein5.2 (0.04)
SPD_0924conserved hypothetical protein3.5 (0.05)
SPD_1045hypothetical protein6.1 (0.02)
SPD_1848conserved hypothetical protein1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1943conserved hypothetical protein2.5 (0.04)
SPD_1319conserved hypothetical protein1.6 (0.01)
SPD_1261conserved hypothetical protein4.3 (0.006)
SPD_1378conserved hypothetical protein2.2 (0.001)
SPD_1281conserved hypothetical protein1.5 (0.02)
SPD_1417conserved hypothetical protein1.8 (0.03)
SPD_1746conserved hypothetical protein2.3 (0.05)
SPD_1946conserved hypothetical protein3.1 (0.03)
SPD_0981adenylate cyclase, putative2.3 (0.02)
Table 3

Gene down-regulated in pneumococcal biofilms grown with pyrimidinedione.

Gene locus/nameProteinMolecular functionBiological functionMean fold gene expression (p-value)
DNA replication
SPD_0002 (dnaN)DNA polymerase III, beta subunit3'-5' exonuclease activity/DNA-directed DNA polymerase activityDNA replication-1.5 (0.009)
SPD_0760 (dnaX)DNA polymerase III, gamma and tau subunitsATP binding/DNA-directed DNA polymerase activityDNA replication-2.6 (0.01)
SPD_2054 (recF)recF proteinATP bindingDNA replication/Repair-1.4 (0.002)
Integral component of membrane
SPD_0040membrane protein, putativeintegral component of membrane-1.5 (0.004)
SPD_0523 (vex3)ABC transporter, transmembrane protein Vexp3Integral component of membrane-1.5 (0.003)
Transcription and DNA binding
SPD_0064transcriptional regulator, GntR family proteinDNA binding /sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activitytranscription, DNA-templated-1.5 (0.01)
SPD_0379transcriptional regulator, MarR family proteinDNA bindingTranscription-2.0 (0.03)
SPD_0447transcriptional regulator, MerR family proteinDNA bindingregulation of transcription, DNA-templated-1.6 (0.03)
SPD_0458 (hrcA)heat-inducible transcription repressor HrcADNA bindingtranscription, DNA-templated-1.4 (0.04)
SPD_0479 (nusA)transcription termination factor NusARNA binding/sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activityRegulation of DNA-templated transcription, termination-1.6 (0.05)
SPD_1134 (pyrR)pyrimidine operon regulatory protein/uracilRNA binding/uracil phosphoribosyltransferase activityDNA-templated transcription, termination-1.4 (0.001)
SPD_1523transcriptional regulator, NrdR family proteinDNA bindingnegative regulation of transcription, DNA-templated-1.5 (0.02)
SPD_1547DNA-directed RNA polymerase omega chain,DNA-directed RNA polymerase activitytranscription, DNA-templated-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_0081DNA-binding response regulatorDNA bindingtranscription, DNA-templated-1.5 (0.007)
SPD_1758 (rpoC)DNA-directed RNA polymerase, beta' subunitDNA-directed RNA polymerase activitytranscription, DNA-templated-1.5 (0.01)
SPD_1797 (ccpA)catabolite control protein Asequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activitytranscription, DNA-templated-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_1819 (nusG)transcription termination/antitermination factorDNA-templated transcription, elongation-1.7 (0.04)
SPD_1818 (comX2)transcriptional regulator ComX2sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activityDNA-templated transcription, initiation-1.4 (0.002)
SPD_0467 (blpS)BlpS proteinDNA binding-1.5 (0.04)
SPD_1594transcriptional regulatorsequence-specific DNA bindingDNA binding-1.9 (0.001)
SPD_1236 (spx)regulatory protein Spx-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_0691transcriptional regulator, PadR family protein-1.8 (0.004)
SPD_0908Sua5/YciO/YrdC/YwlC family proteindouble-stranded RNA binding-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_1014IS630-Spn1, transposase Orf1DNA binding-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_1594transcriptional regulatorsequence-specific DNA bindingDNA binding-1.9 (0.001)
SPD_0716IS630-Spn1, transposase Orf1DNA binding-1.6 (0.05)
SPD_1708IS1167, transposaseDNA bindingtransposition, DNA-mediated-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_1521 (dnaI)primosomal protein DnaIATP binding-1.4 (0.03)
SPD_0315 (cps2A)integral membrane regulatory protein Cps2ADNA replication-2.0 (0.03)
Transport
SPD_0069PTS system, IIA componentphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system-2.6 (0.01)
SPD_0076potassium uptake protein, Trk family proteincation transmembrane transporter activity-1.5 (0.01)
SPD_0224iron(III) ABC transporter, permease proteintransport-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_0424PTS system, cellobiose-specific IIC componentprotein-N(PI)-phosphohistidine-sugar phosphotransferase activityphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system-1.5 (0.03)
SPD_1141 (uraA)uracil-xanthine permeasetransporter activitytransmembrane transport-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1425transporter, major facilitator family proteintransporter activitytransmembrane transport-4.2 (0.03)
SPD_1170oligopeptide ABCtransporter activity-2.0 (0.04)
SPD_0887amino acid permease family proteinamino acid transmembrane transporter activity-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1425transporter, major facilitator family proteintransporter activitytransmembrane transport-4.2 (0.03)
SPD_1409sugar ABC transporter, ATP-binding proteinhydrolase activity, acting on acid anhydrides, catalyzing transmembrane movement of substances-1.4 (0.02)
SPD_1820 (secE)preprotein translocase, SecE subunitP-P-bond-hydrolysis-driven protein transmembrane transporter activityprotein secretion-1.7 (0.006)
SPD_1847PTS system, membrane component, putativephosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system-1.6 (0.02)
SPD_1832PTS system, IIB componentprotein-N(PI)-phosphohistidine-sugar phosphotransferase activityphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1831PTS system, IIC componentprotein-N(PI)-phosphohistidine-sugar phosphotransferase activityphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system-1.7 (0.04)
SPD_1833PTS system, IIA componenttransferase activityphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_1934 (malX)maltose/maltodextrin ABC transporter,maltose transmembrane transporter activity-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_2026ABC transporter, permease proteintransport-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_0400Glycosyl transferase family protein 8, putativetransferase activity, transferring glycosyl groups-1.5 (0.05)
SPD_1677 (rafE)sugar ABC transporter, sugar-binding proteintransporter activity-1.9 (0.05)
SPD_1755ABC transporter, ATP-binding proteinATPase activity-1.9 (0.02)
SPD_1738 (dinF)MATE efflux family protein DinFdrug transmembrane transporter activity-2.2 (0.05)
SPD_1528ABC transporter, ATP-binding proteinATPase activity-1.7 (0.002)
SPD_1438cadmium resistance transporter, putative-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_1431glycosyl transferase, group 2 family proteintransferase activity, transferring glycosyl groups-1.4 (0.04)
SPD_1383cation-transporting ATPase, E1-E2 family-1.5 (0.03)
SPD_1176ABC transporter, ATP-binding proteinATPase activity/ATP binding-1.9 (0.02)
SPD_0960 (cpoA)glycosyl transferase CpoAtransferase activity, transferring glycosyl groupsbiosynthetic process-2.0 (0.01)
SPD_0189acetyltransferase, GNAT family proteinN-acetyltransferase activity-2.3 (0.03)
Phosphate ABC transporter
SPD_1912 (pstA)phosphate ABC transporter, permease proteininorganic phosphate transmembrane transporter activityphosphate ion transmembrane transport-1.7 (0.01)
SPD_1910 (pstS)phosphate ABC transporter, phosphate-bindingABC transportersSignal transduction-1.8 (0.05)
SPD_1913 (pstB)phosphate ABC transporter, ATP-binding proteinphosphate ion transmembrane-transporting ATPase activity-1.9 (0.008)
SPD_1914 (phoU)phosphate transport system regulatory proteinphosphate ion transport-2.2 (0.01)
SPD_1911 (pstC)phosphate ABC transporter, permease proteininorganic phosphate transmembrane transporter activityphosphate ion transport-1.6 (0.01)
Signal transduction
SPD_0082sensor histidine kinaseATP binding/phosphorelay sensor kinase activity-1.4 (0.001)
SPD_0701 (ciaR)DNA-binding response regulator CiaR-1.4 (0.002)
SPD_0702 (ciaH)sensor histidine kinase CiaHATP binding/phosphorelay sensor kinase activity-1.5 (0.003)
SPD_2065 (comC1)competence-stimulating peptide type 1Two-component system-1.5 (0.005)
SPD_1040 (ptsH)phosphocarrier protein HPrprotein serine/threonine kinase activityphosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system-1.6 (0.005)
Membrane protein
SPD_0080cell wall surface anchor family proteinCell wall component-1.7 (0.005)
SPD_0162membrane protein, putative-2.5 (0.05)
SPD_0282membrane protein, putative-1.8 (0.05)
SPD_1237membrane protein, putative-4.6 (0.009)
SPD_1265membrane protein, putative-1.5 (0.008)
SPD_1422membrane protein, putativeMembrane protein-1.5 (0.006)
SPD_1426membrane protein, putative-1.9 (0.04)
SPD_1175membrane protein, putative-1.4 (0.02)
SPD_1717membrane protein, putative-2.6 (0.01)
SPD_1589lipoprotein, putative-2.3 (0.01)
SPD_1527membrane protein, putative-2.1 (0.04)
SPD_1965 (pcpA)choline binding protein PcpA-1.7 (0.003)
t-RNA processing
SPD_0129 (gidA)tRNA uridine 5-carboxymethylaminomethylflavin adenine dinucleotide bindingtRNA wobble uridine modification-2.1 (0.05)
Proteolysis
SPD_0258 (pepS)aminopeptidase PepSaminopeptidase activity-1.8 (0.01)
SPD_0308 (clpL)ATP-dependent Clp protease, ATP-binding subunitATP binding/peptidase activity-1.5 (0.006)
SPD_0558 (prtA)cell wall-associated serine protease PrtAserine-type endopeptidase activity-1.9 (0.04)
SPD_0577 (zmpB)zinc metalloprotease ZmpBmetalloendopeptidase activity/zinc ion binding-1.4 (0.03)
Riboflavin biosynthetic process
SPD_0167 (ribB)3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone 4-phosphate3,4-dihydroxy-2-butanone-4-phosphate synthase activity/GTP bindingriboflavin biosynthetic process-2.2 (0.007)
SPD_0168 (ribE)riboflavin synthase, alpha subunitoxidoreductase activity/riboflavin synthase activityriboflavin biosynthetic process-1.7 (0.006)
Translation
SPD_0192 (rpsJ)ribosomal protein S10structural constituent of ribosome/tRNA bindingtranslation-1.5 (0.01)
SPD_0194 (rplD)ribosomal protein L4rRNA bindingtranslation-1.4 (0.003)
SPD_0197 (rpsS)ribosomal protein S19rRNA binding/structural constituent of ribosometranslation-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_0198 (rplV)ribosomal protein L22rRNA binding/structural constituent of ribosometranslation-1.7 (0.02)
SPD_0199 (rpsC)ribosomal protein S3rRNA bindingtranslation-1.4 (0.006)
SPD_0201 (rpmC)ribosomal protein L29structural constituent of ribosometranslation-1.5 (0.01)
SPD_0202 (rpsQ)ribosomal protein S17rRNA binding/structural constituent of ribosometranslation-1.9 (0.04)
SPD_0204 (rplX)ribosomal protein L24rRNA binding/structural constituent of ribosometranslation-1.7 (0.03)
SPD_0083 (rpsD)ribosomal protein S4rRNA binding/structural constituent of ribosometranslation-1.4 (0.005)
SPD_0835 (frr)ribosome recycling factortranslational termination-1.7 (0.03)
SPD_1148 (rplS)ribosomal protein L19structural constituent of ribosometranslation-1.6 (0.002)
SPD_0906 (prfA)peptide chain release factor 1translation release factor activity, codon specific-2.9 (0.03)
SPD_1245 (rpsU)ribosomal protein S21-1.6 (0.05)
SPD_1370 (rpsF)ribosomal protein S6-1.4 (0.03)
SPD_0481ribosomal protein L7A family proteinRibonucleoprotein, Ribosomal protein-1.7 (0.01)
SPD_2033 (yfiA)ribosomal subunit interface protein-2.2 (0.006)
Fatty acid biosynthetic process
SPD_0380 (fabH)3-oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) synthase III3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase activity/beta-ketoacyl-acyl-carrier-protein synthase III activitYfatty acid biosynthetic process-1.9 (0.009)
SPD_0381 (acpP)acyl carrier proteinACP phosphopantetheine attachment site binding involved in fatty acid biosynthetic process-1.9 (0.007)
SPD_0382 (fabK)trans-2-enoyl-ACP reductase IInitronate monooxygenase activity-1.8 (0.01)
SPD_0383 (fabD)malonyl CoA-acyl carrier protein transacylase[acyl-carrier-protein] S-malonyltransferase activity-2.2 (0.008)
SPD_0384 (fabG)3-oxoacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein) reductase-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_0387 (fabZ)beta-hydroxyacyl-(acyl-carrier-protein)3-hydroxyoctanoyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] dehydratase activityfatty acid biosynthetic process-1.6 (0.03)
SPD_0385 (fabF)3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase IIbeta-ketoacyl-acyl-carrier-protein synthase II activityfatty acid biosynthetic process-1.9 (0.008)
SPD_0386 (accB)acetyl-CoA carboxylase, biotin carboxyl carrieracetyl-CoA carboxylase activityfatty acid biosynthetic process-1.5 (0.001)
SPD_0388 (accC)acetyl-CoA carboxylase, biotin carboxylaseacetyl-CoA carboxylase activity/biotin carboxylase activity-1.9 (0.05)
SPD_0389 (accD)acetyl-CoA carboxylase, carboxyl transferase,acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity/transferase activityfatty acid biosynthetic process-1.7 (0.05)
SPD_0390 (accA)acetyl-CoA carboxylase, carboxyl transferase,acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity/ATP bindingfatty acid biosynthetic process-1.9 (0.03)
SPD_0856 (dgkA)diacylglycerol kinasediacylglycerol kinase activityphospholipid biosynthetic process-1.5 (0.05)
SPD_0347 (mvaD)diphosphomevalonate decarboxylaseATP binding/kinase activityisopentenyl diphosphate biosynthetic process, mevalonate pathway-1.7 (0.03)
Protein folding
SPD_0459 (grpE)heat shock protein GrpEadenyl-nucleotide exchange factor activityprotein folding-1.9 (0.02)
SPD_0460 (dnaK)chaperone protein DnaKATP bindingprotein folding-2.1 (0.01)
SPD_1709 (groL)chaperonin GroELATP bindingprotein refolding-1.4 (0.03)
SPD_0461 (dnaJ)chaperone protein DnaJATP binding/zinc ion bindingDNA replication-1.5 (0.05)
de novo' pyrimidine nucleobase metabolic process
SPD_0608 (pyrF)orotidine 5'-phosphate decarboxylaseorotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activityde novo' pyrimidine nucleobase biosynthetic process-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1133 (pyrB)aspartate carbamoyltransferaseamino acid binding/aspartate carbamoyltransferase activityde novo' pyrimidine nucleobase biosynthetic process-1.4 (0.03)
SPD_0609 (pyrE)orotate phosphoribosyltransferasemagnesium ion binding/orotate phosphoribosyltransferase activityde novo' UMP biosynthetic process-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_1548 (gmk)guanylate kinaseATP bindingpurine nucleotide metabolic process-1.5 (0.05)
SPD_0834 pyrH)uridylate kinaseATP binding/UMP kinase activityde novo' CTP biosynthetic process-1.4 (0.008)
Thiamine biosynthetic process
SPD_0624 (thiE-1)thiamine-phosphate pyrophosphorylasemagnesium ion binding/thiamine-phosphate diphosphorylase activitythiamine biosynthetic process-1.5 (0.007)
SPD_0628 (tenA)transcriptional activator TenA, TENA/THI-4thiaminase activitythiamine metabolic process-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_1779thiamine pyrophosphokinasethiamine bindingthiamine metabolic process-1.5 (0.03)
Cell division
SPD_0659 (ftsE)cell division ATP-binding protein FtsEATPase activity/ATP bindingcell division-1.7 (0.02)
SPD_1477 (ylmF)YlmF proteinbarrier septum assemblybarrier septum assembly-1.5 (0.003)
SPD_1478 (ylmE)YlmE protein-1.4 (0.03)
SPD_1479 (ftsZ)cell division protein FtsZGTPase activitybarrier septum assembly-1.4 (0.05)
Carbohydrate metabolism
SPD_0723 (rpiA)ribose 5-phosphate isomerase Aribose-5-phosphate isomerase activitypentose-phosphate shunt, non-oxidative branch-1.5 (0.03)
SPD_0790 (pyk)pyruvate kinasemagnesium ion binding/potassium ion bindingglycolytic process-1.4 (0.02)
SPD_1012 (eno)phosphopyruvate hydratasemagnesium ion binding/phosphopyruvate hydratase activityglycolytic process-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_0420 (pflB)formate acetyltransferaseformate C-acetyltransferase activitycarbohydrate metabolic process-1.6 (0.03)
SPD_1823 (gap)glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, typeoxidoreductase activity, acting on the aldehyde or oxo group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptorglucose metabolic process-1.8 (0.04)
SPD_1582sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase, putativesucrose alpha-glucosidase activitycarbohydrate metabolic process-1.6 (0.006)
SPD_0143UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase, putativeNAD binding/UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase activitypolysaccharide biosynthetic process-2.1 (0.02)
SPD_0870phosphoglycerate mutase family protein-2.5 (0.009)
Hydrolases
SPD_1076 (srtA)sortase-1.5 (0.005)
Cellular amino acid biosynthesis
SPD_1209 (aroB)3-dehydroquinate synthase3-dehydroquinate synthase activityaromatic amino acid family biosynthetic process-1.6 (0.008)
SPD_1372glyoxalase family protein-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_0764 (sufS)cysteine desulfurases, SufS subfamily proteincysteine desulfurase activity/pyridoxal phosphate bindingcysteine metabolic process-1.4 (0.009)
SPD_1899glutamine amidotransferase, class 1hydrolase activityglutamine metabolic process-1.5 (0.02)
Catalytic activity
SPD_1411isochorismatase family proteincatalytic activity-1.4 (0.04)
SPD_1555isochorismatase family proteincatalytic activity-1.4 (0.01)
SPD_0852 (pyrDb)dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, catalytic subunit-1.4 (0.02)
Homeostasis process
SPD_1714thioredoxin family proteinprotein disulfide oxidoreductase activitycell redox homeostasis/glycerol ether metabolic process-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1464 (psaD)thiol peroxidasethioredoxin peroxidase activitycell redox homeostasis-2.2 (0.004)
SPD_1041 (nrdH)glutaredoxin-like protein NrdHelectron carrier activity/protein disulfide oxidoreductase activitycell redox homeostasis-1.7 (0.03)
SPD_1028 (acoA)TPP-dependent acetoin dehydrogenaseoxidoreductase activity, acting on the aldehyde or oxo group of donors, disulfide as acceptor-1.4 (0.02)
SPD_0190 (nrdG)anaerobic ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductase[formate-C-acetyltransferase]-activating enzyme activity/4 iron, 4 sulfur cluster binding-2.7 (0.02)
Pathogenesis/cytolysis
SPD_1726 (ply)pneumolysincholesterol bindinghemolysis of cells in other organism/pathogenesis-1.5 (0.005)
SPD_1295hemolysin-2.7 (0.03)
SPD_0729hemolysin-related proteincholesterol bindingpathogenesis-1.6 (0.005)
Response to stress
SPD_1590general stress protein 24, putative-1.6 (0.001)
SPD_0667 (sodA)superoxide dismutase, manganese-dependentmetal ion binding/superoxide dismutase activity-1.4 (0.003)
SPD_1135 (nth)endonuclease III4 iron, 4 sulfur cluster binding/DNA-(apurinic or apyrimidinic site) lyase activitybase-excision repair-2.1 (0.004)
Cell wall organization and biogenesis
SPD_0853 (lytB)endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase precursor,amidase activity/mannosyl-glycoprotein endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase activity-1.6 (0.05)
Conserved hypothetical protein
SPD_0030conserved hypothetical protein-1.5 (0.001)
SPD_0145conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.001)
SPD_0164conserved hypothetical protein-1.8 (0.01)
SPD_0181conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.02)
SPD_0182conserved hypothetical protein-1.8 (0.009)
SPD_0256conserved hypothetical protein-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_0302conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.002)
SPD_0339conserved hypothetical protein-1.5 (0.03)
SPD_0410conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_0425conserved hypothetical protein-1.9 (0.02)
SPD_0478conserved hypothetical protein-1.8 (0.05)
SPD_0488conserved hypothetical protein-2.2 (0.001)
SPD_0489conserved hypothetical protein-1.6 (0.007)
SPD_0499conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.002)
SPD_0594conserved hypothetical protein-1.8 (0.008)
SPD_0681conserved hypothetical protein-1.3 (0.04)
SPD_0714conserved hypothetical protein-1.5 (0.03)
SPD_0791conserved hypothetical protein-2.1 (0.01)
SPD_0911conserved hypothetical protein-1.6 (0.05)
SPD_0929conserved hypothetical protein-1.7 (0.04)
SPD_0959conserved hypothetical protein-1.9 (0.02)
SPD_0962conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.008)
SPD_0990conserved hypothetical protein-1.7 (0.02)
SPD_1003conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.03)
SPD_1159conserved hypothetical protein-1.3 (0.05)
SPD_1171conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.007)
SPD_1242conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.04)
SPD_1294conserved hypothetical protein-2.8 (0.05)
SPD_1344conserved hypothetical protein-1.8 (0.03)
SPD_1380conserved hypothetical protein-1.2 (0.007)
SPD_1400conserved hypothetical protein-1.5 (0.02)
SPD_1558conserved hypothetical protein-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_1566conserved hypothetical protein-2.3 (0.01)
SPD_1588conserved hypothetical protein-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_1595conserved hypothetical protein-1.9 (0.004)
SPD_1662conserved hypothetical protein-1.6 (0.01)
SPD_1716conserved hypothetical protein-1.8 (0.008)
SPD_1718conserved hypothetical protein-2.7 (0.002)
SPD_1725conserved hypothetical protein-1.6 (0.004)
SPD_1728conserved hypothetical protein-1.8 (0.008)
SPD_1727conserved hypothetical protein-1.8 (0.005)
SPD_1729conserved hypothetical protein-1.6 (0.002)
SPD_1858conserved hypothetical protein-1.5 (0.007)
SPD_0855conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.05)
SPD_1836conserved hypothetical protein-1.4 (0.05)
Fig 9

Differential gene expression detected by microarray in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms with respect to control biofilms.

(A) Number of genes significantly (p< 0.05) up-regulated. (B) Number of genes significantly (p< 0.05) down-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms.

Differential gene expression detected by microarray in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms with respect to control biofilms.

(A) Number of genes significantly (p< 0.05) up-regulated. (B) Number of genes significantly (p< 0.05) down-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. The functional annotation of the differentially regulated genes revealed that genes involved in galactose metabolism were exclusively up-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. Genes related to DNA replication, cell division and the cell cycle, pathogenesis, phosphate-specific transport, signal transduction, fatty acid biosynthesis, protein folding, homeostasis, competence, and biofilm formation were down-regulated. The fold change values of relative gene expression and predicted protein functions are detailed in Tables 2 and 3. Nine genes involved in galactose metabolism were significantly up-regulated, while eight genes were down-regulated. Tagatose-6-phosphate pathway genes (lacA, lacB, lacC, lacD, and lacG-2) and Leloir pathway (galT-1and galE-2) genes were significantly up-regulated (Fig 10). In addition, the lacF2 gene (encoding the PTS system, lactose-specific IIA component) and the lacE2 gene (encoding the PTS system, lactose-specific IIBC components) were also up-regulated. However, the gap (encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), eno (encoding phosphopyruvate hydratase), and pyk (encoding pyruvate kinase) genes involved in glycolysis were down-regulated.
Fig 10

Schematic representation of central metabolic pathways in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39.

In pneumococci, lactose and galactose are metabolized by the tagatose-6-phosphate pathway (light orange box) and the Leloir pathway (left; light green box). Tagatose-6-phosphate pathway genes include lacA, lacB, lacC, and lacD, and Leloir pathway genes include galM, galK, galT-1, and galE-2. Along with these the lacF2 gene (encodes the PTS system, lactose-specific IIA component) and lacE2 gene (encodes the PTS system, lactose-specific IIBC component) are required for galactose transport. The gap gene (encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), eno gene (encoding phosphopyruvate hydratase), and pyk gene (encoding pyruvate kinase) are involved in glycolysis (central blue box). The lacA, lacB, lacC, lacD, galT-1, galE-2, lacE-2, gap, eno and pyk genes were down-regulated by more than 1.4 folds in this study. The relative fold-changes in gene expression are highlighted.

Schematic representation of central metabolic pathways in Streptococcus pneumoniae D39.

In pneumococci, lactose and galactose are metabolized by the tagatose-6-phosphate pathway (light orange box) and the Leloir pathway (left; light green box). Tagatose-6-phosphate pathway genes include lacA, lacB, lacC, and lacD, and Leloir pathway genes include galM, galK, galT-1, and galE-2. Along with these the lacF2 gene (encodes the PTS system, lactose-specific IIA component) and lacE2 gene (encodes the PTS system, lactose-specific IIBC component) are required for galactose transport. The gap gene (encoding glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), eno gene (encoding phosphopyruvate hydratase), and pyk gene (encoding pyruvate kinase) are involved in glycolysis (central blue box). The lacA, lacB, lacC, lacD, galT-1, galE-2, lacE-2, gap, eno and pyk genes were down-regulated by more than 1.4 folds in this study. The relative fold-changes in gene expression are highlighted. The microarray results detected that expression of 11 genes belonging to the fatty acid synthesis (FAS) locus was significantly down-regulated (more than 1.4-fold) in pneumococcal biofilms grown in the presence of pyrimidinedione. No FAS pathway genes were up-regulated. The FAS pathway is made up of 13 genes arranged in a single locus that are involved in FAS initiation and product elongation (Fig 11).
Fig 11

Fatty acid biosynthesis gene locus in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

(A) FAS involves 13 genes that are arranged in a single locus that initiate fatty acid synthesis and product elongation. The fatty acid synthesis genes include: acpP, encoding acyl carrier protein (ACP); accD, encoding acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase subunit beta; fabG, encoding 3-ketoacyl-ACP reductase; fabH, encoding 3-oxoacyl-ACP synthase III; fabK, encoding trans-2-enoyl-ACP reductase II; fabD, encoding ACP S-malonyltransferase; fabF, encoding 3-oxoacyl-ACP synthase II; fabZ, encoding (3R)-hydroxymyristoyl-ACP dehydratase; accA, encoding acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase subunit alph; accB, encoding acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase subunit; and accC, encoding acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase subunit. (B) The interconnection of fatty acid genes detected by STRING v9.1 on the basis of terms on the right. The fold-changes in gene expression are highlighted.

Fatty acid biosynthesis gene locus in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

(A) FAS involves 13 genes that are arranged in a single locus that initiate fatty acid synthesis and product elongation. The fatty acid synthesis genes include: acpP, encoding acyl carrier protein (ACP); accD, encoding acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase subunit beta; fabG, encoding 3-ketoacyl-ACP reductase; fabH, encoding 3-oxoacyl-ACP synthase III; fabK, encoding trans-2-enoyl-ACP reductase II; fabD, encoding ACP S-malonyltransferase; fabF, encoding 3-oxoacyl-ACP synthase II; fabZ, encoding (3R)-hydroxymyristoyl-ACP dehydratase; accA, encoding acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase subunit alph; accB, encoding acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase subunit; and accC, encoding acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase subunit. (B) The interconnection of fatty acid genes detected by STRING v9.1 on the basis of terms on the right. The fold-changes in gene expression are highlighted. Five genes involved in signal transduction were also down-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. Expression of the ciaR and ciaH gene, encoding a DNA-binding response regulator protein and a sensor histidine kinase respectively were down-regulated. These two genes encode the two-component regulatory system CiaH/CiaR, which is involved in the early steps of competence regulation. Expression of the comC gene, encoding the competence-stimulating peptide type 1, essential for pneumococcal competence and biofilm formation, was down-regulated 1.5-fold. Similarly, expressions of the ptsH gene, encoding the phosphocarrier protein HPr, and the SPD_0082 gene, encoding a sensor histidine kinase, were down-regulated 1.6- and 1.4-fold, respectively. The expression of six virulence protein-encoding genes, ply, SPD_1295 (hemolysin), nrc (SPD_0729), prtA, lytB, and srtA was down-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. The expression of the ply gene was down-regulated 1.5-fold. The SPD_1295 and nrc genes were down-regulated by 2.7 and 1.6-fold respectively. Expression of the prtA, lytB, and srtA genes was down-regulated by 1.9, 1.6, and 1.5-fold respectively. A large number of genes involved in transcription and DNA binding were down-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. Expression of 23 transcription and DNA binding genes was down-regulated, while five genes were up-regulated. Important down-regulated genes include, ccpA, rpoC, comX2, bplS, spx, and cps2A. The ccpA gene encodes catabolite control protein A, which is a negative repressor protein with a regulatory role in carbohydrate metabolism. The comX2gene encodes a sigma factor that functions as a competence-specific global transcription modulator involved in bacterial competence. Other down-regulated genes encoded cell membrane proteins, as well as proteins involved in amino acid synthesis, catalytic activity, cell wall organization and biogenesis, homeostasis, response to stress, and thiamine and riboflavin biosynthesis. Thirteen differentially expressed genes from our microarray analysis were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR, and their differential expression levels were in agreement with the microarray data (Table 4).
Table 4

Gene expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR.

Fold changes in gene expression of biofilms grown with pyrimidinedione with respect to control.

GeneMean fold changep-value
lacG-2 1.50.05
lacT 3.50.05
cglD 2.20.05
capD 2.30.03
adk2.50.03
galT-1 3.10.03
purC 2.20.02
fabD -2.40.05
dnak -2.00.04
nrdG -3.00.01
phoU -3.10.01
pstB -1.80.03
acpP -1.80.02

Gene expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR.

Fold changes in gene expression of biofilms grown with pyrimidinedione with respect to control.

Pyrimidinedione does not exhibit eukaryotic cell toxicity

The CCK8 cell viability experiment revealed no significant difference in mean absorbance of HMEECs treated with 1, 5, or 10 μM pyrimidinedione with respect to untreated or DMSO-controls (p>0.45). The absorbance of 2% triton X-100 treated HMEECs was significantly (p<0.002) lower than control- or pyrimidinedione-treated cells, indicating no acute cellular cytotoxicity at the tested concentrations (Fig 12). Thus, pyrimidinedione showed no evidence of acute toxicity to human HMEECs at a concentration of 10 μM, which was 10-fold greater than the established EC50.
Fig 12

Cytotoxicity of pyrimidinedione on HMEECs.

The cytotoxicity of pyrimidinedione was tested on the HMEEC line using a CCK-8 kit. The absorbance of the reaction was measured at 450 nm, and was compared among HMEECs exposed to pyrimidinedione (1 μM, or 5 μM, or 10 μM), 2% Triton X-100 (complete lysis), control (medium alone), and DMSO-control. No significant difference in mean absorbance was detected for HMEECs treated with various concentrations of pyrimidinedione versus untreated or DMSO controls (p> 0.43). However, all were significantly different from triton X-100-treated cells (p< 0.002), indicating no acute cellular cytotoxicity at the tested concentrations. The results were compared by Student’s t-test (*** corresponds to p< 0.002, #corresponds to p>0.43). The error bars represent the SD.

Cytotoxicity of pyrimidinedione on HMEECs.

The cytotoxicity of pyrimidinedione was tested on the HMEEC line using a CCK-8 kit. The absorbance of the reaction was measured at 450 nm, and was compared among HMEECs exposed to pyrimidinedione (1 μM, or 5 μM, or 10 μM), 2% Triton X-100 (complete lysis), control (medium alone), and DMSO-control. No significant difference in mean absorbance was detected for HMEECs treated with various concentrations of pyrimidinedione versus untreated or DMSO controls (p> 0.43). However, all were significantly different from triton X-100-treated cells (p< 0.002), indicating no acute cellular cytotoxicity at the tested concentrations. The results were compared by Student’s t-test (*** corresponds to p< 0.002, #corresponds to p>0.43). The error bars represent the SD.

Discussion

S. pneumoniae are known to cause various biofilm-related infections in human. The physiology, metabolism, and gene expression profile of biofilm bacteria are different than planktonic bacteria (18). In S. pneumoniae biofilms, the quorum sensing (QS) signal generated by competence stimulating peptide (CSP) plays an important role in coordinating the spatial distribution of cells and the aggregation of exopolysaccharides [34,35]. Autoinducer-2 (AI-2) is the only QS molecule in pneumococci synthesized through activated methyl cycle (AMC), where Dam enzyme catalyze the transfer of a methyl group from SAM to macromolecules and adenine within DNA duplex [36,37,38]. Therefore, we hypothesized that interfering in Dam activity could have adverse effect on S. pneumoniae biofilms growth. Several studies reported that DNA adenine methylation regulates the expression of various virulence-related genes in numerous pathogens [39,40,41]. Our previous study demonstrated that interfering with methylation activity, either using the hypo-methylating agent (5-azacytidine) or a SAM analogue (sinefungin), inhibited pneumococcal biofilm growth. In this study, we examined the effect of the small molecule Dam inhibitor, pyrimidinedione, on S. pneumoniae biofilm growth. We then evaluated global gene expression changes within biofilms grown in the presence of pyrimidinedione. Planktonic cell growth of S. pneumoniae D39 was not inhibited in the presence of different pyrimidinedione concentrations. The CV-microtiter plate assay and cfu counts detected a significant decrease in biofilm formation in samples treated with pyrimidinedione, and this inhibitory effect was concentration-dependent in all serotypes tested. The normal growth of planktonic cells and decreased biofilm formation in presence of pyrimidinedione indicated that pyrimidinedione selectively inhibits pneumococcal biofilms. Similarly, the Dam mutant strains of Yersinia enterocolitica and Haemophilius influenza showed reduced adhesion and host cell invasion capacity [42,43]. Pyrimidinedione was effective in inhibiting pneumococcal biofilm growth at both early and late stages [44]. Similar inhibitory effects of 5-aza-cytidine and sinefungin on S. pneumoniae biofilms as well as a small molecule adenosine mimetic on Salmonella enteric biofilms were previously reported [27,28,45]. However, pyrimidinedione was not effective in dismantling biofilms nor was it cytotoxic to bacteria within biofilms. S. aureus and S. epidermidis are important pathogens implicated in a wide variety of biofilm-related infections, including infections present within medical devices. The inhibitory effects of pyrimidinedione on S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA) and S. epidermidis biofilms indicated broad-spectrum anti-biofilm activity against antibiotic-resistant bacteria. To understand biofilm changes at the microscopic level, we examined biofilms grown with and without pyrimidinedione by confocal microscopy and SEM. In microscopic analysis, the control and pyrimidinedione-biofilms demonstrated a significantly different morphology. The control biofilms were well organized and compact with significant thickness, and the cells were interconnected with each other and to the base of the plate [46]. A remarkable feature of these control biofilms was the presence of EPS [47]. EPS was completely absent in biofilms grown with pyrimidinedione. Due to lack of EPS, the cells were scattered, attached only to the bottom of the plate, and were unable to form an organized biofilm structure [48]. EPS is important for biofilm development; the absence of this structure indicated that bacteria were attached to the bottom of the plate. Therefore, it is possible that they could be easily washed away, decreasing biofilm biomass calculations and cfu counts [49]. In-order to examine the changes in gene expression of pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms, we evaluated global gene expression by microarray analysis. The overall gene expression pattern demonstrated that more genes were down-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms compared to control biofilms. The gene expression analysis of 13 differentially expressed genes identified by microarray was confirmed using real-time RT-PCR. A functional annotation demonstrated that 17 functional gene groups were exclusively down-regulated, and four clusters were exclusively up-regulated in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. The down-regulation of genes involved in DNA replication, cell division, cell organization and biogenesis, response to stress, homeostasis, and protein folding indicated that cell division may be perturbed and that cells were stressed in the presence of pyrimidinedione. In support of this hypothesis, 13 genes encoding ribosomal proteins showed reduced transcription in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms, indicating that the pneumococci had reduced its translational capacity [50]. Similarly, bacterial transcriptional, signaling, and transport capacity may also be obstructed by down-regulation of transcription, DNA binding, transport, and signaling protein-encoding genes in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. Fatty acid biosynthesis is essential for bacterial membrane integrity and cellular physiology, and the fatty acid biosynthesis gene mutant strains were unable to survive [51]. Pneumococcal fatty acid biosynthesis genes are collectively known as type II fatty acid synthase, which are clustered at a single location. The down-regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis genes in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms indicated that disruption of fatty acid biosynthesis and product elongation may be affected. A striking observation in our microarray and real-time RT-PCR gene expression results was the up-regulation of galactose metabolic pathway genes and down-regulation of glycolysis pathway genes. In pneumococci, lactose and galactose are metabolized by the tagatose-6-phosphate and Leloir pathways, respectively [52,53,54]. Our results demonstrated up-regulation of tagatose pathway genes, Leloir pathway genes, lactose-specific IIA & IIBC component encoding genes (lacF2and lacE2), and the lacT gene, encoding a transcriptional antiterminator. Conversely, we found down-regulation of glycolysis pathway genes in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. The up-regulation of galactose metabolism genes indicated that cellular carbohydrate metabolism was changed, and cells adapted to an alternative pathway. In pneumococci, the galactose and lactose metabolism pathway genes are up-regulated in the presence of sugars other than glucose [55]. The precise reason for the up-regulation of the galactose metabolic pathway genes in the presence of pyrimidinedione remains to be elucidated. However, it was reported that the transcription factor CcpA (carbon catabolite protein A), ptsH, encoding the phosphocarrier protein HPr, and the SPD_0082 gene, encoding a sensor histidine kinase, facilitates pneumococci utilization of diverse carbohydrate sources during colonization, multiplication, and biofilm formation [56,57]. Moreover, the regulation of the central carbohydrate metabolic pathway genes is under the control of carbon catabolite repression (CCR), which is mediated by the transcription factor CcpA and the histidine phosphoprotein HPr [58,59,60]. The down-regulation of five phosphate-specific transport system genes indicates that the transportation of molecules from the periplasm to the cytoplasm may be hindered by pyrimidinedione. Mutagenesis of the pst ABC genes in pneumococci resulted in decreased rates of phosphate uptake, decreased growth rates, decreased transformation, and reduced pathogenicity [61,62]. Here we detected the down regulation of virulence-related genes (ply, srtA, ptrA, lytB, nrc, and SPD_1295) in pyrimidinedione-grown biofilms. The ply gene is a virulence gene encoding the toxin pneumolysin, which causes eukaryotic cell lysis and plays a major role in pneumococcal invasion [63,64]. In S. pneumonia, the srtA gene is another virulence gene, and the srtA gene mutant strain showed low virulence and low adherence towards human pharyngeal cells [65]. The lytB gene encodes a choline-binding protein, and nrc and SPD_1295 encode hemolytic proteins. The prtA gene encodes the pneumococcal cell wall-associated serine protease A, which is important in virulence in intraperitoneal infections [66]. The significantly decreased biofilm growth observed in the presence of pyrimidinedione may be due to the decreased expression of competence and biofilm-related genes (Fig 13). Here, the competence stimulating peptide-1 (CSP-1) precursor encoding gene comC, the two-component regulator encoding genes ciaH and ciaR, and the alternative sigma factor encoding gene comX were down-regulated in response to pyrimidinedione treatment. In S. pneumoniae, the CSP-mediated QS system initiates the regulation of genetic competence, which involves the expression of early gene products encoded by comAB and comCD genes, and the two-component regulatory system CiaH-CiaR [67,68]. The pneumococcal comC gene encodes the CSP precursor and the comDE genes encode the CSP receptor and response regulator protein. The CiaH-CiaR negatively regulates comCDE expression and thus affects the development of competence. The response regulator comE binds to the early gene promoter and initiates transcription, as a results accumulation of CSP, ComD, phosphorylated ComE and ComX (a global transcription modulator) increases. The ComX alternative sigma factor initiates the transcription of late competence-specific operon, which facilities in DNA uptake and recombination of DNA [68,69]. Previous studies have reported that QS plays an important role in biofilm formation and a ciaR/H gene mutant strain was unable to form biofilms [49]. Oggioni et al. (2006) detected up-regulation of the comC gene in biofilms and demonstrated that S. pneumoniae comC mutants were less virulent and unable to form biofilms in vitro. They further reported that, when supplemented with external CSP-1, wild type levels of biofilm formation were restored in the mutant strain [18]. Similarly, in S. mutans, a comC mutant strain was unable to produce the signal peptide and biofilm formation was disrupted.
Fig 13

Schematic diagram representing genetic competence mediated by quorum sensing molecule competence specific peptide (CSP) in S. pneumoniae.

Induction of genetic competence in pneumococci is regulated by a CSP–mediated quorum-sensing system. The precursor of CSP is encoded by the comC gene, and the ComAB (secretary and transporter) protein, facilities extracellular accumulation of mature CSP. Mature CSP then binds to ComD receptor, resulting in ComD auto-phosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer to the response regulator, ComE. Phosphorylated ComE binds to the early gene promoter and activates the transcription of early genes. As a result of ComE binding, the transcription of the comCDE operon, and the production of CSP, ComD and phosphorylated ComE levels increase. ComE binding also initiates the accumulation of ComX (alternative sigma factor). ComX binds to the late gene promoter and stimulates the expression of late protein-encoding genes which facilitates recombination and DNA uptake. CiaH-CiaR is the second two-component regulatory system affecting the development of competence via regulation of comCDE expression. The fold-changes of gene expression are highlighted in red.

Schematic diagram representing genetic competence mediated by quorum sensing molecule competence specific peptide (CSP) in S. pneumoniae.

Induction of genetic competence in pneumococci is regulated by a CSP–mediated quorum-sensing system. The precursor of CSP is encoded by the comC gene, and the ComAB (secretary and transporter) protein, facilities extracellular accumulation of mature CSP. Mature CSP then binds to ComD receptor, resulting in ComD auto-phosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer to the response regulator, ComE. Phosphorylated ComE binds to the early gene promoter and activates the transcription of early genes. As a result of ComE binding, the transcription of the comCDE operon, and the production of CSP, ComD and phosphorylated ComE levels increase. ComE binding also initiates the accumulation of ComX (alternative sigma factor). ComX binds to the late gene promoter and stimulates the expression of late protein-encoding genes which facilitates recombination and DNA uptake. CiaH-CiaR is the second two-component regulatory system affecting the development of competence via regulation of comCDE expression. The fold-changes of gene expression are highlighted in red. Our results indicate that the Dam inhibitor, pyrimidinedione, down-regulates the expression of various pathway genes including those involved in cellular metabolism, translation, transcription, cell division, amino-acid synthesis, virulence, and DNA replication. Previous studies report that disruption of Dam or Dam activity affects bacterial fitness and alters gene expression [39,40,41,70]. These perturbations were postulated to be indirect secondary effects of basic cellular fitness. As a result, pneumococcal planktonic cell growth was reduced but not completely inhibited. It is likely that the down-regulation of competence and biofilm-related genes resulted in lower levels of biofilm growth. These bacteria were unable to build organized biofilms or aggregate biofilm matrix [49].

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that a small molecule Dam inhibitor, pyrimidinedione, perturbed pneumococcal biofilm growth in vitro at concentrations that did not inhibit planktonic cell growth and down-regulated the expression of important metabolic-, virulence-, competence-, and biofilm-related genes. Pyrimidinedione is also effective against MSSA, MRSA, and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm growth in vitro, and it is not cytotoxic to mammalian cells. Pyrimidinedione has potential for the development of new anti-biofilm compounds, and a ideal candidate molecule which require further study for in vivo biofilm prevention.
  70 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Cynthia B Whitchurch; Tim Tolker-Nielsen; Paula C Ragas; John S Mattick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Therapeutic frontiers: preventing and treating infectious diseases by inhibiting bacterial quorum sensing.

Authors:  C A Martin; A D Hoven; A M Cook
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Biofilms in ear, nose, and throat infections: how important are they?

Authors:  Petros V Vlastarakos; Thomas P Nikolopoulos; Paul Maragoudakis; Antonios Tzagaroulakis; Eleftherios Ferekidis
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Novel approaches to the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae as the cause of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Keith P Klugman; Shabir A Madhi; Werner C Albrich
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Transcriptional regulation of the Streptococcus mutans gal operon by the GalR repressor.

Authors:  D Ajdić; J J Ferretti
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Functional genomics approach to identifying genes required for biofilm development by Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Zezhang T Wen; Robert A Burne
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients.

Authors:  Boris Görke; Jörg Stülke
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 60.633

9.  Characterization of mucosal biofilms on human adenoid tissues.

Authors:  Romain E Kania; Gerda E M Lamers; Marcel J Vonk; Esmee Dorpmans; Joyce Struik; Patrice Tran Ba Huy; Pieter Hiemstra; Guido V Bloemberg; Jan J Grote
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Formation of Streptococcus pneumoniae non-phase-variable colony variants is due to increased mutation frequency present under biofilm growth conditions.

Authors:  Magee Allegrucci; Karin Sauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of Black Grape Seed Extract (Vitis vinifera) on Biofilm Formation of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus haemolyticus.

Authors:  Alia Hussein Al-Mousawi; Siham Jasim Al-Kaabi; Ahmad J H Albaghdadi; Abbas F Almulla; Ameer Raheem; Ali Abbas Abo Algon
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Targeting the Holy Triangle of Quorum Sensing, Biofilm Formation, and Antibiotic Resistance in Pathogenic Bacteria.

Authors:  Ronit Vogt Sionov; Doron Steinberg
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  Effect of childhood vaccination and antibiotic use on pneumococcal populations and genome-wide associations with disease among children in Nepal: an observational study.

Authors:  Rama Kandasamy; Stephanie Lo; Meeru Gurung; Michael J Carter; Rebecca Gladstone; John Lees; Sonu Shrestha; Stephen Thorson; Sanjeev Bijukchhe; Madhav C Gautam; Reetu Shrestha; Sunaina Gurung; Bibek Khadka; Lesley McGee; Robert F Breiman; David R Murdoch; Dominic F Kelly; Shrijana Shrestha; Stephen D Bentley; Andrew J Pollard
Journal:  Lancet Microbe       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  In vitro Multi-Species Biofilms of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Their Host Interaction during In vivo Colonization of an Otitis Media Rat Model.

Authors:  Mukesh K Yadav; Sung-Won Chae; Yoon Young Go; Gi Jung Im; Jae-Jun Song
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Anti-virulence Therapeutic Strategies With a Focus on Dismantling Bacterial Membrane Microdomains, Toxin Neutralization, Quorum-Sensing Interference and Biofilm Inhibition.

Authors:  Osmel Fleitas Martínez; Marlon Henrique Cardoso; Suzana Meira Ribeiro; Octavio Luiz Franco
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.