Literature DB >> 22645283

Pneumococcal interactions with epithelial cells are crucial for optimal biofilm formation and colonization in vitro and in vivo.

Laura R Marks1, G Iyer Parameswaran, Anders P Hakansson.   

Abstract

The human nasopharynx is the main reservoir for Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) and the source for both horizontal spread and transition to infection. Some clinical evidence indicates that nasopharyngeal carriage is harder to eradicate with antibiotics than is pneumococcal invasive disease, which may suggest that colonizing pneumococci exist in biofilm communities that are more resistant to antibiotics. While pneumococcal biofilms have been observed during symptomatic infection, their role in colonization and the role of host factors in this process have been less studied. Here, we show for the first time that pneumococci form highly structured biofilm communities during colonization of the murine nasopharynx that display increased antibiotic resistance. Furthermore, pneumococcal biofilms grown on respiratory epithelial cells exhibited phenotypes similar to those observed during colonization in vivo, whereas abiotic surfaces produced less ordered and more antibiotic-sensitive biofilms. The importance of bacterial-epithelial cell interactions during biofilm formation was shown using both clinical strains with variable colonization efficacies and pneumococcal mutants with impaired colonization characteristics in vivo. In both cases, the ability of strains to form biofilms on epithelial cells directly correlated with their ability to colonize the nasopharynx in vivo, with colonization-deficient strains forming less structured and more antibiotic-sensitive biofilms on epithelial cells, an association that was lost when grown on abiotic surfaces. Thus, these studies emphasize the importance of host-bacterial interactions in pneumococcal biofilm formation and provide the first experimental data to explain the high resistance of pneumococcal colonization to eradication by antibiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22645283      PMCID: PMC3434590          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00488-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  75 in total

1.  Spontaneous sequence duplication within an open reading frame of the pneumococcal type 3 capsule locus causes high-frequency phase variation.

Authors:  R D Waite; J K Struthers; C G Dowson
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 2.  Biofilms as complex differentiated communities.

Authors:  P Stoodley; K Sauer; D G Davies; J W Costerton
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  Illustration of pneumococcal polysaccharide capsule during adherence and invasion of epithelial cells.

Authors:  Sven Hammerschmidt; Sonja Wolff; Andreas Hocke; Simone Rosseau; Ellruth Müller; Manfred Rohde
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Change in nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae resulting from antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media in children.

Authors:  R Cohen; E Bingen; E Varon; F de La Rocque; N Brahimi; C Levy; M Boucherat; J Langue; P Geslin
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Bactericidal activity of various antibiotics against biofilm-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  A Abdi-Ali; M Mohammadi-Mehr; Y Agha Alaei
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 5.283

6.  Role of pneumococcal surface protein C in nasopharyngeal carriage and pneumonia and its ability to elicit protection against carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Priya Balachandran; Alexis Brooks-Walter; Anni Virolainen-Julkunen; Susan K Hollingshead; David E Briles
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  The pneumococcal serine-rich repeat protein is an intra-species bacterial adhesin that promotes bacterial aggregation in vivo and in biofilms.

Authors:  Carlos J Sanchez; Pooja Shivshankar; Kim Stol; Samuel Trakhtenbroit; Paul M Sullam; Karin Sauer; Peter W M Hermans; Carlos J Orihuela
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Penetration of a selected antibiotic and antiseptic into a biofilm formed on orthopedic steel implants.

Authors:  Marzenna Bartoszewicz; Anna Rygiel; Marek Krzemiński; Anna Przondo-Mordarska
Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil       Date:  2007 May-Jun

Review 9.  The pathogenesis of streptococcal infections: from tooth decay to meningitis.

Authors:  Timothy J Mitchell
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  The impact of the competence quorum sensing system on Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms varies depending on the experimental model.

Authors:  Claudia Trappetti; Luciana Gualdi; Lorenzo Di Meola; Prashant Jain; Cindy C Korir; Paul Edmonds; Francesco Iannelli; Susanna Ricci; Gianni Pozzi; Marco R Oggioni
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  76 in total

1.  Host intestinal signal-promoted biofilm dispersal induces Vibrio cholerae colonization.

Authors:  Amanda J Hay; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Influenza A virus alters pneumococcal nasal colonization and middle ear infection independently of phase variation.

Authors:  John T Wren; Lance K Blevins; Bing Pang; Lauren B King; Antonia C Perez; Kyle A Murrah; Jennifer L Reimche; Martha A Alexander-Miller; W Edward Swords
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Directed vaccination against pneumococcal disease.

Authors:  Yi Li; Andrew Hill; Marie Beitelshees; Shuai Shao; Jonathan F Lovell; Bruce A Davidson; Paul R Knight; Anders P Hakansson; Blaine A Pfeifer; Charles H Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Absence of capsule reveals glycan-mediated binding and recognition of salivary mucin MUC7 by Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  S Thamadilok; H Roche-Håkansson; A P Håkansson; S Ruhl
Journal:  Mol Oral Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.563

5.  A Role of Epithelial Cells and Virulence Factors in Biofilm Formation by Streptococcus pyogenes In Vitro.

Authors:  Feiruz Alamiri; Yashuan Chao; Maria Baumgarten; Kristian Riesbeck; Anders P Hakansson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Comparison of specific in-vitro virulence gene expression and innate host response in locally invasive vs colonizer strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Naoko Fuji; Michael E Pichichero; Ravinder Kaur
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Insights on persistent airway infection by non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Christian P Ahearn; Mary C Gallo; Timothy F Murphy
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  A1 adenosine receptor signaling reduces Streptococcus pneumoniae adherence to pulmonary epithelial cells by targeting expression of platelet-activating factor receptor.

Authors:  Manmeet Bhalla; Jun Hui Yeoh; Claire Lamneck; Sydney E Herring; Essi Y I Tchalla; Lauren R Heinzinger; John M Leong; Elsa N Bou Ghanem
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.715

9.  Expression of the Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae Type IV Pilus Is Stimulated by Coculture with Host Respiratory Tract Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Elaine M Mokrzan; Taylor J Johnson; Lauren O Bakaletz
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Streptococcus pyogenes biofilm growth in vitro and in vivo and its role in colonization, virulence, and genetic exchange.

Authors:  Laura R Marks; Lauren Mashburn-Warren; Michael J Federle; Anders P Hakansson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 5.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.