Literature DB >> 23232923

On the nature and sociology of bioethics.

Mark Sheehan1, Michael Dunn.   

Abstract

Much has been written in the last decade about how we should understand the value of the sociology of bioethics. Increasingly the value of the sociology of bioethics is interpreted by its advocates directly in terms of its relationship to bioethics. It is claimed that the sociology of bioethics (and related disciplinary approaches) should be seen as an important component of work in bioethics. In this paper we wish to examine whether, and how, the sociology of bioethics can be defended as a valid and justified research activity, in the context of debates about the nature of bioethics. We begin by presenting and arguing for an account of bioethics that does justice to the content of the field, the range of questions that belong within this field, and the justificatory standards (and methodological orientations) that can provide convincing answers to these questions. We then consider the role of sociology in bioethics and show how and under what conditions it can contribute to answering questions within bioethics. In the final section, we return to the sociology of bioethics to show that it can make only a limited contribution to the field.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23232923     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-012-0234-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  13 in total

1.  Professional ethicist available: logical, secular, friendly.

Authors:  Charles L Bosk
Journal:  Daedalus       Date:  1999

2.  Bioethics and history.

Authors:  Robert Baker
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2002-08

3.  Meanings, policies, and medicine: on the bioethical enterprise and history.

Authors:  C E Rosenberg
Journal:  Daedalus       Date:  1999

4.  How can we help? From "sociology in" to "sociology of" bioethics.

Authors:  Raymond De Vries
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 5.  Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations.

Authors:  Adam Hedgecoe
Journal:  Soc Stud Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.885

6.  Framing neuroethics: a sociological assessment of the neuroethical imagination.

Authors:  Raymond De Vries
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Sociology, ethics, and the priority of the particular: learning from a case study of genetic deliberations.

Authors:  Erica Haimes; Robin Williams
Journal:  Br J Sociol       Date:  2007-09

8.  Bioethics and social studies of medicine: overlapping concerns.

Authors:  Leigh Turner
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Toward methodological innovation in empirical ethics research.

Authors:  Michael Dunn; Mark Sheehan; Tony Hope; Michael Parker
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  What can history do for bioethics?

Authors:  Duncan Wilson
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 1.898

View more
  6 in total

1.  Does science need bioethicists? Ethics and science collaboration in biomedical research.

Authors:  Angeliki Kerasidou; Michael Parker
Journal:  Res Ethics       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  A bioethics for all seasons.

Authors:  Sarah Chan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Bin it or pin it? Which professional ethical guidance on managing COVID-19 should I follow?

Authors:  Richard Huxtable
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Beyond Binaries: Dissolving the Empirical/Normative Divide.

Authors:  Sarah Chan; Sarah Cunningham-Burley; Giulia de Togni; Sonia Erikainen; Nayha Sethi; Kayo Takashima
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

5.  Bioethics as a Governance Practice.

Authors:  Jonathan Montgomery
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2016-03

6.  Setting standards for empirical bioethics research: a response to Carter and Cribb.

Authors:  Michael Dunn; Jonathan Ives; Bert Molewijk; Jan Schildmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.