| Literature DB >> 26428854 |
Hiromi Kato1, Hiroshi Mori2, Fumito Maruyama3, Atsushi Toyoda4, Kenshiro Oshima5, Ryo Endo1, Genki Fuchu1, Masatoshi Miyakoshi1, Ayumi Dozono2, Yoshiyuki Ohtsubo1, Yuji Nagata1, Masahira Hattori5, Asao Fujiyama6, Ken Kurokawa7, Masataka Tsuda8.
Abstract
Soil microbial communities have great potential for bioremediation of recalcitrant aromatic compounds. However, it is unclear which taxa and genes in the communities, and how they contribute to the bioremediation in the polluted soils. To get clues about this fundamental question here, time-course (up to 24 weeks) metagenomic analysis of microbial community in a closed soil microcosm artificially polluted with four aromatic compounds, including phenanthrene, was conducted to investigate the changes in the community structures and gene pools. The pollution led to drastic changes in the community structures and the gene sets for pollutant degradation. Complete degradation of phenanthrene was strongly suggested to occur by the syntrophic metabolism by Mycobacterium and the most proliferating genus, Burkholderia. The community structure at Week 24 (∼12 weeks after disappearance of the pollutants) returned to the structure similar to that before pollution. Our time-course metagenomic analysis of phage genes strongly suggested the involvement of the 'kill-the-winner' phenomenon (i.e. phage predation of Burkholderia cells) for the returning of the microbial community structure. The pollution resulted in a decrease in taxonomic diversity and a drastic increase in diversity of gene pools in the communities, showing the functional redundancy and robustness of the communities against chemical disturbance.Entities:
Keywords: metagenome; phage; recalcitrant aromatic compounds; robustness; soil microbiome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26428854 PMCID: PMC4675710 DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsv023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: DNA Res ISSN: 1340-2838 Impact factor: 4.458
Figure 1.Phylum- and genus-level taxonomical succession of microbial communities in control and polluted soils. PCR amplicons of V3–V4 regions in the 16S rRNA genes from metagenomic samples were pyrosequenced, and taxonomically assigned by the RDP classifier (see the text for details). (A) Phylum-level succession. (B) Genus-level succession. C and M: metagenomic samples from the control and polluted soils, respectively. The numerals before C and M are the weeks after the pollution. Only the top 15 prokaryotic genera are shown for simplicity. Taxa with asterisks are genera incertae sedis.
Figure 2.Hierarchical clustering analysis of taxonomic and functional compositions of 11 soil metagenomic samples. Clustering of (A) taxonomic compositions of 97% OTUs of 16S rRNA gene amplicons, and (B) functional compositions of genes for KEGG KO-assigned proteins was performed by comparison of the Euclidean distances. See the text for details.
Figure 3.Time-course changes in taxonomic and functional diversity of metagenomes in control and polluted soils. (A) Taxonomic diversity. (B) Functional diversity. Open and closed circles: control and polluted soils, respectively. The Shannon-Wiener indices (H′) for taxonomic and functional diversities of the metagenomic samples were calculated from the compositions of 97% OTUs of the 16S rRNA gene amplicons and the compositions of genes for KO-assigned proteins, respectively.
Figure 4.Time-course changes in abundances of genes for aerobic degradation of aromatic compounds in polluted soil. A simplified pathway map for well-known aerobic degradation routes of the four polluted compounds. Boxes located in each route indicate representative reaction steps, and several steps (dashed lines) are omitted for simplicity. Abbreviations of enzymes are shown in Supplementary Table S5. The two graphs indicate the taxonomic compositions and the abundance of the genes in each reaction step. The upper graph shows the abundances at the phylum level (with the exception that the domain and class levels are shown for Archaea and Proteobacteria, respectively), and the lower graph the abundances at the level limited to the genera of Mycobacterium and Burkholderia. See Section 2 for the details to calculate gene abundances. Depending on the abundances, the scales of Y-axes of graphs are conventionally categorized into four groups with the following colours: grey, 10−6; blue, 10−5; purple, 10−4; and red, 10−3. More detailed results at the overall pathway map level by using the metagenomic samples from the control and polluted soils are depicted in Supplementary Figs S8 and S9.
Figure 5.Time-course changes in abundances of phage genome-derived sequences in soil metagenomic samples. (A) Abundance of phage genome-derived reads in control (open circle) and polluted (closed) soil metagenomic samples based on BLASTX search of the Illumina reads against the ACLAME DB. (B) Relative abundances of a 44.5-kb contig (Contig70-3) DNA putatively derived from a phage genome from Burkholderia (blue circle) and the Burkholderia genomic DNA (red circle) in the control (open circle) and the polluted (closed circle) samples. The abundance of Contig70-3 DNA in each sample was based on the numbers of hit reads counted in BLASTN search of the metagenomic reads against Contig70-3, whereas the abundance of Burkholderia genomic DNA was based on the numbers of hit reads taxonomically assigned to Burkholderia by BLASTX search against the KEGG DB. The hit numbers in both cases were normalized by the number of gyrB-added USCGs in each metagenomic sample. The relative abundances of the Contig70-3 and Burkholderia genomes are expressed by taking the respective smallest values as 1.