Literature DB >> 26425660

Doxycycline and therapeutic targeting of the DNA damage response in cancer cells: old drug, new purpose.

Maria Peiris-Pagès1, Federica Sotgia1, Michael P Lisanti1.   

Abstract

There is a small proportion of cells within a tumour with self-renewing properties, which is resistant to conventional therapy, and is responsible for tumour initiation, maintenance and metastasis. These cells are known as cancer stem cells (CSCs) or tumour-initiating cells (TICs) [1]. Recent publications identify several antibiotics, such as salinomycin or doxycycline, as selective CSCs inhibitors [2-4]. However, the mechanisms of action of these antibiotics on CSCs are not fully understood.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; DNA-PK; antibiotics for cancer therapy; cancer metabolism; cancer stem cells; doxycycline; drug repurposing; mitochondria

Year:  2015        PMID: 26425660      PMCID: PMC4580062          DOI: 10.18632/oncoscience.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoscience        ISSN: 2331-4737


Doxycycline effects on DNA repair

Previous studies performed in our lab showed higher levels of mitochondrial proteins in breast CSCs, defined by their capability to grow in suspension as mammospheres, compared with the bulk of cancer cells grown under regular conditions [2]. That discovery led to the hypothesis that such increase in mitochondrial protein abundance could be reversed by treating these mammospheres with antibiotics, hence eradicating the CSCs population, as several classes of FDA-approved antibiotics can inhibit mitochondrial protein synthesis. Indeed several antibiotics, such as doxycycline, were able to inhibit mammosphere formation [2]. However, the mechanism of action of doxycycline remained unidentified and in a further effort to elucidate it, our lab recently published a report demonstrating reduced expression of proteins associated with mitochondrial metabolism, EMT, protein synthesis, and more curiously, with DNA damage response after doxycycline treatment in a breast cancer cell line [5]. Particularly, one of the best doxycycline targets identified by our quantitative proteomics analysis was DNA-PK, the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase, which is required for proper NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining) DNA repair [6], for maintenance of mitochondrial DNA integrity and copy number [7], and it confers resistance to radiation and chemotherapy in cancer cells [8]. Interestingly, DNA-PK was also found to be up-regulated in mammospheres, and its genetic knock-down or pharmacological inhibition using either doxycycline or an established DNA-PK inhibitor (NU7441) blocked that mammosphere formation. In fact, a closer look at the chemical structure reveals that doxycycline is a reduced carba-analogue of other DNA-PK inhibitors (Figures 1 and 2), although the direct interaction between doxycycline and DNA-PK still needs to be proved. Mechanistically, doxycycline treatment reduced not only the general metabolic state of breast cancer cells and their capacity to resist anoikis, but also inhibited their antioxidant response and several stem-related signalling pathways including Wnt, Shh, Notch, TGFβ and STAT3, the inhibition of which induces anoikis and radio and chemosensitivity [1, 9-14]. DNA-PK has even been shown to directly interact with LEF1, which acts downstream in the Wnt signaling [15]. Similarly, salinomycin, another antibiotic, has also been reported to act on breast CSC by inhibiting Wnt pathway [3].
Figure 1

Chemical structures of three known DNA-PK inhibitors A) NU-7026, B) NU-7441, C) KU-0060648 and D) a chemical entity common to all of these DNA-PK inhibitors

Figure 2

Chemical structure and comparison between doxycycline and a conserved chemical entity within DNA-PK inhibitors

Doxycycline is a reduced carba-analogue of other DNA-PK inhibitors.

Chemical structure and comparison between doxycycline and a conserved chemical entity within DNA-PK inhibitors

Doxycycline is a reduced carba-analogue of other DNA-PK inhibitors. Radiation and chemotherapy induce DNA damage, which is lethal to the cells if it is not repaired. It is now known that CSCs protect themselves from DNA damaging treatment by regulating cell cycle, by scavenging more efficiently the reactive oxygen species and by enhancing their DNA repair capability. Several studies demonstrate that CSCs have an activated DNA repair process, as well as a more robust activation of DNA damage response genes and proteins than non-stem cells [16], which makes them resistant to cancer therapy. In line with these results, our study also shows the effects of doxycycline on increasing sensitivity to radiation treatment.

Doxycycline effects on neddylation and ubiquitination

Recent clinical trials involving doxycycline have already shown positive therapeutic effects in lymphoma patients [17]. In agreement with that, a recent publication by Pulvino et al., demonstrated that doxycycline inhibits diffuse large B cell lymphoma growth in vitro and in vivo, in part via inhibition of CSN5 activity and reduction of HSP90 levels and function [18]. CSN5 is a member of the COP-9 signalosome complex that inhibits neddylation, a process similar to ubiquitination. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of CSN5 using doxycycline was able to decrease CSN5 deneddylation function, impairing cell survival in diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells. Altogether these results indicated that doxycycline treatment induces proteasomal degradation by increasing ubiquitination and neddylation in lymphoma cells. In addition, the study demonstrated that doxycycline treatment causes cell cycle arrest and inhibits NFkB and STAT3 signalling, as our experiments show. Finally, in the report the authors mention that they observed synergetic cytotoxic effects of doxycycline and several chemotherapeutic agents in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, giving another indication that doxycycline targets chemoresistant CSCs. In contrast with that, though, it has been shown in human cells that inhibition of neddylation sensitizes cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapeutic agents although the mechanisms behind this synergy are not fully understood and have not been consistent [19]. Nevertheless, it is now well established that an enhanced DNA damage response is one of the features that allow CSCs to overcome treatment. The efficiency of DNA damage detection and repair requires the recruitment and modification of a complex protein network. The DNA damage response is a tightly regulated process involving reversible post-translational modifications such as ubiquitination and neddylation, which regulate protein stability and function, preventing de novo protein synthesis [16, 19]. To sum up, in addition to the well-known doxycycline anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory effects, and its ability to inhibit metal membrane proteinases (MMPs) by chelating the essential zinc ions of these enzymes [20], this new evidence in breast cancer and lymphoma cells indicate that doxycycline has also a clear impact in regulating the DNA damage response, including DNA repair (DNA-PK), ubiquitination and neddylation (CSN5 and HSP90), as well as in suppressing different developmental and EMT pathways (Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, TGFβ and STAT3), all processes found to be reinforced in CSCs and to confer resistance to anoikis and conventional therapies [1, 9, 11-14]. A successful cancer therapy should aim to eliminate all cancer cells, including the intrinsically resistant CSC population, which ultimately will give rise to recurrence and metastasis. That is why the concept that doxycycline and other antibiotics may reduce the viability and growth of the CSC population is of great importance and should be further investigated. Last but not least, doxycycline is an excellent example of how existing, inexpensive, well-tolerated drugs might be repurposed not only as new cancer therapeutic agents, but also might provide the new insights needed to fully understand CSC traits in tumours. Likewise it is important to properly establish the bioequivalent dose required to block CSCs.
  20 in total

Review 1.  A role for cancer stem cells in therapy resistance: cellular and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Monica Cojoc; Katrin Mäbert; Michael H Muders; Anna Dubrovska
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 2.  Crosstalk between DNA repair and cancer stem cell (CSC) associated intracellular pathways.

Authors:  Sergej Skvortsov; Paul Debbage; Peter Lukas; Ira Skvortsova
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Bacteria-eradicating therapy with doxycycline in ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma: a multicenter prospective trial.

Authors:  Andrés J M Ferreri; Maurilio Ponzoni; Massimo Guidoboni; Antonio Giordano Resti; Letterio S Politi; Sergio Cortelazzo; Judit Demeter; Francesco Zallio; Angelo Palmas; Giuliana Muti; Giuseppina P Dognini; Elisa Pasini; Antonia Anna Lettini; Federico Sacchetti; Carlo De Conciliis; Claudio Doglioni; Riccardo Dolcetti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  STAT3 induces anoikis resistance, promotes cell invasion and metastatic potential in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Neel M Fofaria; Sanjay K Srivastava
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  Identification of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit as a novel interaction partner of lymphocyte enhancer factor 1.

Authors:  Atsushi Shimomura; Akihiko Takasaki; Ryuji Nomura; Nobuhiro Hayashi; Takao Senda
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  Mechanisms that link the oncogenic epithelial-mesenchymal transition to suppression of anoikis.

Authors:  Steven M Frisch; Michael Schaller; Benjamin Cieply
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  RNA sequencing of pancreatic circulating tumour cells implicates WNT signalling in metastasis.

Authors:  Min Yu; David T Ting; Shannon L Stott; Ben S Wittner; Fatih Ozsolak; Suchismita Paul; Jordan C Ciciliano; Malgorzata E Smas; Daniel Winokur; Anna J Gilman; Matthew J Ulman; Kristina Xega; Gianmarco Contino; Brinda Alagesan; Brian W Brannigan; Patrice M Milos; David P Ryan; Lecia V Sequist; Nabeel Bardeesy; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Mehmet Toner; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Ubiquitylation, neddylation and the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Jessica S Brown; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.411

9.  Inhibition of COP9-signalosome (CSN) deneddylating activity and tumor growth of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas by doxycycline.

Authors:  Mary Pulvino; Luojing Chen; David Oleksyn; Jing Li; George Compitello; Randy Rossi; Stephen Spence; Vijaya Balakrishnan; Craig Jordan; Brian Poligone; Carla Casulo; Richard Burack; Joel L Shapiro; Steven Bernstein; Jonathan W Friedberg; Raymond J Deshaies; Hartmut Land; Jiyong Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-20

10.  Doxycycline down-regulates DNA-PK and radiosensitizes tumor initiating cells: Implications for more effective radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rebecca Lamb; Marco Fiorillo; Amy Chadwick; Bela Ozsvari; Kimberly J Reeves; Duncan L Smith; Robert B Clarke; Sacha J Howell; Anna Rita Cappello; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Maria Peiris-Pagès; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-06-10
View more
  9 in total

1.  CD4+ memory T cells infected with latent HIV-1 are susceptible to drugs targeting telomeres.

Authors:  Dorota Piekna-Przybylska; Sanjay B Maggirwar
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Repurposed drug screen identifies cardiac glycosides as inhibitors of TGF-β-induced cancer-associated fibroblast differentiation.

Authors:  David T Coleman; Alana L Gray; Charles A Stephens; Matthew L Scott; James A Cardelli
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-31

3.  Targeting flavin-containing enzymes eliminates cancer stem cells (CSCs), by inhibiting mitochondrial respiration: Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Bela Ozsvari; Gloria Bonuccelli; Rosa Sanchez-Alvarez; Richard Foster; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Dodecyl-TPP Targets Mitochondria and Potently Eradicates Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs): Synergy With FDA-Approved Drugs and Natural Compounds (Vitamin C and Berberine).

Authors:  Ernestina Marianna De Francesco; Béla Ózsvári; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Intracellular Amplifiers of Reactive Oxygen Species Affecting Mitochondria as Radiosensitizers.

Authors:  Hong-Gui Xu; Viktor Reshetnikov; Marit Wondrak; Lisa Eckhardt; Leoni A Kunz-Schughart; Christina Janko; Rainer Tietze; Christoph Alexiou; Hannes Borchardt; Achim Aigner; Wenjie Gong; Michael Schmitt; Leopold Sellner; Steffen Daum; Hülya Gizem Özkan; Andriy Mokhir
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Systems Immunology of Diabetes-Tuberculosis Comorbidity Reveals Signatures of Disease Complications.

Authors:  Cesar A Prada-Medina; Kiyoshi F Fukutani; Nathella Pavan Kumar; Leonardo Gil-Santana; Subash Babu; Flávio Lichtenstein; Kim West; Shanmugam Sivakumar; Pradeep A Menon; Vijay Viswanathan; Bruno B Andrade; Helder I Nakaya; Hardy Kornfeld
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Doxycycline, an Inhibitor of Mitochondrial Biogenesis, Effectively Reduces Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) in Early Breast Cancer Patients: A Clinical Pilot Study.

Authors:  Cristian Scatena; Manuela Roncella; Antonello Di Paolo; Paolo Aretini; Michele Menicagli; Giovanni Fanelli; Carolina Marini; Chiara Maria Mazzanti; Matteo Ghilli; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti; Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases: Perspective From a Long-Term Survivor.

Authors:  Christopher P Kofron; Angela Chapman
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.279

9.  Mitochondrial Fission Factor (MFF) Inhibits Mitochondrial Metabolism and Reduces Breast Cancer Stem Cell (CSC) Activity.

Authors:  Rosa Sánchez-Alvarez; Ernestina Marianna De Francesco; Marco Fiorillo; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.