Literature DB >> 26419205

Research of methods to detect genomic mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas systems.

Kun Wang1, Dong Yi Mei2, Qian Nan Liu3, Xiao Huan Qiao4, Wei Min Ruan5, Tian Huang6, Geng Sheng Cao7.   

Abstract

The indel-forming non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway repairs double strand breaks in mammalian genomes, resulting in mutation formation following genome editing. Common techniques employed to identify these mutations include the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and SURVEYOR assays, which are time consuming, laborious, and only offer a low level of sensitivity. An alternative to these approaches, which is examined in this study, is based on the quantitative PCR high-resolution melting (qPCR-HRM) curve analysis technique and offers simple implementation, is capable of handling large sample sizes, takes no more than 90 min, and produces sensitive results. Using the newly discovered RNA-guided CRISPR/Cas systems, the IL2RG and EMX1 genes were edited in the human 293T cell line in order to compare the mutation detection accuracies of the aforementioned methods. Genomic mutations were simulated by mixing mutated DNA fragments with normal fragments along a concentration gradient. The results of this comparative study showed that the HRM approach was both reproducible and accurate.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplified fragment length polymorphism; CRISPR/Cas system; Genome editing; Quantitative PCR high-resolution melting; SURVEYOR assay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26419205     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biotechnol        ISSN: 0168-1656            Impact factor:   3.307


  7 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR/Cas systems: opportunities and challenges for crop breeding.

Authors:  Sukumar Biswas; Dabing Zhang; Jianxin Shi
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  A Digital PCR-Based Method for Efficient and Highly Specific Screening of Genome Edited Cells.

Authors:  Scott D Findlay; Krista M Vincent; Jennifer R Berman; Lynne-Marie Postovit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Non-Homologous End Joining and Homology Directed DNA Repair Frequency of Double-Stranded Breaks Introduced by Genome Editing Reagents.

Authors:  Michail Zaboikin; Tatiana Zaboikina; Carl Freter; Narasimhachar Srinivasakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Discrimination of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants of rice seeds using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging.

Authors:  Xuping Feng; Cheng Peng; Yue Chen; Xiaodan Liu; Xujun Feng; Yong He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Efficient generation of mutations mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in the hairy root transformation system of Brassica carinata.

Authors:  Thomas W Kirchner; Markus Niehaus; Thomas Debener; Manfred K Schenk; Marco Herde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Recombinant Pseudorabies Virus (PRV) Expressing Firefly Luciferase Effectively Screened for CRISPR/Cas9 Single Guide RNAs and Antiviral Compounds.

Authors:  Yan-Dong Tang; Ji-Ting Liu; Qiong-Qiong Fang; Tong-Yun Wang; Ming-Xia Sun; Tong-Qing An; Zhi-Jun Tian; Xue-Hui Cai
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 7.  CRISPR Screens in Synthetic Lethality and Combinatorial Therapies for Cancer.

Authors:  Laia Castells-Roca; Eudald Tejero; Benjamín Rodríguez-Santiago; Jordi Surrallés
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.