Literature DB >> 2641894

Comparison of single-shot localization methods (STEAM and PRESS) for in vivo proton NMR spectroscopy.

C T Moonen1, M von Kienlin, P C van Zijl, J Cohen, J Gillen, P Daly, G Wolf.   

Abstract

Two single-shot localization techniques, STEAM and PRESS, are analyzed with regard to specifications for in vivo localized proton NMR. In particular, attention is paid to optimum signal intensity per unit volume, sensitivity to motion and diffusion, shortest attainable echo time, water suppression and editing possibilities. Experimental results are shown for cat brain at 4.7 T and human brain at 1.5 T. Both STEAM and PRESS are highly effective localization methods. For long echo times, PRESS is the method of choice, because it offers a factor of two gain in signal intensity. In addition, the method is less sensitive to motion and diffusion, and not susceptible to multiple-quantum effects. STEAM offers advantages for observation of (coupled) metabolites with short T2, because (a) shorter TEs can be attained and (b) effective water suppression sequences can be implemented without penalty in echo time. Differences relating to editing possibilities and B1 dependence, possibly important in choosing a method, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2641894     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1940020506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  30 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain and prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging of the brain.

Authors:  He Zhu; Peter B Barker
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

Review 3.  Cardiovascular nuclear magnetic resonance: basic and clinical applications.

Authors:  John R Forder; Gerald M Pohost
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  PRESS-based proton single-voxel spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging with very short echo times using asymmetric RF pulses.

Authors:  Christian Geppert; Wolfgang Dreher; Dieter Leibfritz
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Assessing tissue metabolism by phosphorous-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging: a methodology review.

Authors:  Yuchi Liu; Yuning Gu; Xin Yu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Recent advances in magnetic resonance neurospectroscopy.

Authors:  Yael Rosen; Robert E Lenkinski
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Usefulness of single voxel proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of hippocampal sclerosis.

Authors:  K H Chang; H D Kim; S W Park; I C Song; I K Yu; M H Han; S K Lee; C K Chung; Y H Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  A semiadiabatic spectral-spatial spectroscopic imaging (SASSI) sequence for improved high-field MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Rebecca E Feldman; Priti Balchandani
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Effects of contrast material on single-volume proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  J K Smith; L Kwock; M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  In-vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in adnexal lesions.

Authors:  Seong Whi Cho; Soon Gu Cho; Jung Hee Lee; Hyung Jin Kim; Myung Kwan Lim; Jong Hwa Kim; Chang Hae Suh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.