J K Smith1, L Kwock, M Castillo. 1. Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Administration of contrast material before proton MR spectroscopy may allow more accurate placement of the volume of interest, particularly in tumors; yet, some data have suggested that contrast material may alter the results of MR spectroscopy. To determine the validity of this contention, we performed pre- and postcontrast MR spectroscopy in patients with brain tumors and compared the results with those obtained from a phantom. METHODS: Ten patients with astrocytomas were examined with single-volume MR spectroscopy before and after administration of contrast material. Voxel placement was identical for all studies. Peak area, peak height, and width at half maximum were measured for N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), and choline (Cho) in all studies. A phantom containing a 10 mmol concentration of NAA, Cr, and Cho was prepared in phosphate-buffered saline and mixed with contrast concentrations varying from 0.1 to 1.0 mmol. The phantom was studied by MR spectroscopy with the same parameters as used for the clinical studies. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the pre- and postcontrast MR spectroscopy studies for the three parameters measured. In phantom studies, there was a significant decline in the Cho peak area and height and an increase in the width at half maximum as the concentration of contrast material increased from 0.1 to 1.0 mmol. NAA and Cr peaks showed no significant changes in peak height or area. CONCLUSION: Contrast material may be administered before clinical MR spectroscopy without affecting its interpretation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Administration of contrast material before proton MR spectroscopy may allow more accurate placement of the volume of interest, particularly in tumors; yet, some data have suggested that contrast material may alter the results of MR spectroscopy. To determine the validity of this contention, we performed pre- and postcontrast MR spectroscopy in patients with brain tumors and compared the results with those obtained from a phantom. METHODS: Ten patients with astrocytomas were examined with single-volume MR spectroscopy before and after administration of contrast material. Voxel placement was identical for all studies. Peak area, peak height, and width at half maximum were measured for N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), and choline (Cho) in all studies. A phantom containing a 10 mmol concentration of NAA, Cr, and Cho was prepared in phosphate-buffered saline and mixed with contrast concentrations varying from 0.1 to 1.0 mmol. The phantom was studied by MR spectroscopy with the same parameters as used for the clinical studies. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the pre- and postcontrast MR spectroscopy studies for the three parameters measured. In phantom studies, there was a significant decline in the Cho peak area and height and an increase in the width at half maximum as the concentration of contrast material increased from 0.1 to 1.0 mmol. NAA and Cr peaks showed no significant changes in peak height or area. CONCLUSION: Contrast material may be administered before clinical MR spectroscopy without affecting its interpretation.
Authors: Ihab S Haddadin; Adeka McIntosh; Sina Meisamy; Curt Corum; Angela L Styczynski Snyder; Nathaniel J Powell; Michael T Nelson; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood; Patrick J Bolan Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: E C Lima; M C G Otaduy; M Tsunemi; R Pincerato; E F Cardoso; S Rosemberg; P H Aguiar; G G Cerri; C C Leite Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Amit M Saindane; Soonmee Cha; Meng Law; Xiaonan Xue; Edmond A Knopp; David Zagzag Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Melanie Freed; Pippa Storey; Alana Amarosa Lewin; James Babb; Melanie Moccaldi; Linda Moy; Sungheon G Kim Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Meng Law; Stanley Yang; Hao Wang; James S Babb; Glyn Johnson; Soonmee Cha; Edmond A Knopp; David Zagzag Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825