Douglas S Krakower1, Kenneth H Mayer. 1. aThe Fenway Institute - Fenway Health bBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center cHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most recent studies assessing the preparedness of healthcare practitioners to provide anti-HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and suggest areas for future implementation research. RECENT FINDINGS: As PrEP is a biobehavioral intervention, healthcare providers are likely to play a critical role in implementing PrEP in care settings. Studies suggest that many specialized providers are aware of PrEP and support its provision as a public health intervention, though knowledge and acceptance are less among generalists. Therefore, utilization of PrEP by clinicians has been limited to a few early adopters. Concerns about the efficacy and long-term safety of PrEP, and perceived barriers to prescribing PrEP, could limit prescribing behaviors and intentions. Resistance to performing routine HIV risk assessments by clinicians is an additional barrier to implementing PrEP, although innovative tools to help clinicians routinely perform risk assessments, are being developed. SUMMARY: Interventions are needed to engage a broader array of healthcare providers in PrEP provision. Utilizing a framework based on diffusion of innovation theory, this review proposes strategies that can be implemented and evaluated to increase PrEP prescribing by healthcare providers. If resources are invested in training clinicians to provide PrEP, then these stakeholders could enhance the use of PrEP as part of a prevention package by primary providers.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most recent studies assessing the preparedness of healthcare practitioners to provide anti-HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and suggest areas for future implementation research. RECENT FINDINGS: As PrEP is a biobehavioral intervention, healthcare providers are likely to play a critical role in implementing PrEP in care settings. Studies suggest that many specialized providers are aware of PrEP and support its provision as a public health intervention, though knowledge and acceptance are less among generalists. Therefore, utilization of PrEP by clinicians has been limited to a few early adopters. Concerns about the efficacy and long-term safety of PrEP, and perceived barriers to prescribing PrEP, could limit prescribing behaviors and intentions. Resistance to performing routine HIV risk assessments by clinicians is an additional barrier to implementing PrEP, although innovative tools to help clinicians routinely perform risk assessments, are being developed. SUMMARY: Interventions are needed to engage a broader array of healthcare providers in PrEP provision. Utilizing a framework based on diffusion of innovation theory, this review proposes strategies that can be implemented and evaluated to increase PrEP prescribing by healthcare providers. If resources are invested in training clinicians to provide PrEP, then these stakeholders could enhance the use of PrEP as part of a prevention package by primary providers.
Authors: Dawn K Smith; Yi Pan; Charles E Rose; Sherri L Pals; Shruti H Mehta; Gregory D Kirk; Jeffrey H Herbst Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Michael C Thigpen; Poloko M Kebaabetswe; Lynn A Paxton; Dawn K Smith; Charles E Rose; Tebogo M Segolodi; Faith L Henderson; Sonal R Pathak; Fatma A Soud; Kata L Chillag; Rodreck Mutanhaurwa; Lovemore Ian Chirwa; Michael Kasonde; Daniel Abebe; Evans Buliva; Roman J Gvetadze; Sandra Johnson; Thom Sukalac; Vasavi T Thomas; Clyde Hart; Jeffrey A Johnson; C Kevin Malotte; Craig W Hendrix; John T Brooks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jared M Baeten; Deborah Donnell; Patrick Ndase; Nelly R Mugo; James D Campbell; Jonathan Wangisi; Jordan W Tappero; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Elly Katabira; Allan Ronald; Elioda Tumwesigye; Edwin Were; Kenneth H Fife; James Kiarie; Carey Farquhar; Grace John-Stewart; Aloysious Kakia; Josephine Odoyo; Akasiima Mucunguzi; Edith Nakku-Joloba; Rogers Twesigye; Kenneth Ngure; Cosmas Apaka; Harrison Tamooh; Fridah Gabona; Andrew Mujugira; Dana Panteleeff; Katherine K Thomas; Lara Kidoguchi; Meighan Krows; Jennifer Revall; Susan Morrison; Harald Haugen; Mira Emmanuel-Ogier; Lisa Ondrejcek; Robert W Coombs; Lisa Frenkel; Craig Hendrix; Namandjé N Bumpus; David Bangsberg; Jessica E Haberer; Wendy S Stevens; Jairam R Lingappa; Connie Celum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jens D Lundgren; Abdel G Babiker; Fred Gordin; Sean Emery; Birgit Grund; Shweta Sharma; Anchalee Avihingsanon; David A Cooper; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Josep M Llibre; Jean-Michel Molina; Paula Munderi; Mauro Schechter; Robin Wood; Karin L Klingman; Simon Collins; H Clifford Lane; Andrew N Phillips; James D Neaton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sarah K Calabrese; Mehrit Tekeste; Kenneth H Mayer; Manya Magnus; Douglas S Krakower; Trace S Kershaw; Adam I Eldahan; Lauren A Gaston Hawkins; Kristen Underhill; Nathan B Hansen; Joseph R Betancourt; John F Dovidio Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Benedikt Pleuhs; Katherine G Quinn; Jennifer L Walsh; Andrew E Petroll; Steven A John Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Chen Zhang; James McMahon; Kevin Fiscella; Sarahmona Przybyla; Amy Braksmajer; Natalie LeBlanc; Yu Liu Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Helen L Zhang; Sarah K Rhea; Christopher B Hurt; Victoria L Mobley; Heidi Swygard; Arlene C Seña; Mehri S McKellar Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Oliver Bacon; Rafael Gonzalez; Erin Andrew; Michael B Potter; James R Iñiguez; Stephanie E Cohen; Albert Y Liu; Jonathan D Fuchs Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731