| Literature DB >> 27146110 |
Zachary R Gergely1,2, Ammon Crapo1, Loren E Hough1, J Richard McIntosh2, Meredith D Betterton3.
Abstract
Kinesin-8 motor proteins destabilize microtubules. Their absence during cell division is associated with disorganized mitotic chromosome movements and chromosome loss. Despite recent work studying effects of kinesin-8s on microtubule dynamics, it remains unclear whether the kinesin-8 mitotic phenotypes are consequences of their effect on microtubule dynamics, their well-established motor activity, or additional, unknown functions. To better understand the role of kinesin-8 proteins in mitosis, we studied the effects of deletion of the fission yeast kinesin-8 proteins Klp5 and Klp6 on chromosome movements and spindle length dynamics. Aberrant microtubule-driven kinetochore pushing movements and tripolar mitotic spindles occurred in cells lacking Klp5 but not Klp6. Kinesin-8-deletion strains showed large fluctuations in metaphase spindle length, suggesting a disruption of spindle length stabilization. Comparison of our results from light microscopy with a mathematical model suggests that kinesin-8-induced effects on microtubule dynamics, kinetochore attachment stability, and sliding force in the spindle can explain the aberrant chromosome movements and spindle length fluctuations seen.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27146110 PMCID: PMC5221583 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E15-07-0505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Cell ISSN: 1059-1524 Impact factor: 4.138
FIGURE 1:Overview. (A) Schematics of fission yeast mitosis and kinesin-8 assembly states: Klp5/6 heterodimer, Klp5/5 homodimer, and Klp6 monomer. (B) Live-cell images of wild-type and kinesin-8 deletion mutant cells with GFP-tagged spindle pole bodies and kinetochore (green), as well as mCherry-tagged tubulin (red), illustrating the longer mitotic spindle length in cells with kinesin-8 deleted. (C) Fixed-cell images with GFP-tagged SPBs and KC (green), mCherry-tagged tubulin (red), and DAPI-stained DNA (blue). Left, cell containing a lost KC, spindle, and polar MT bundle. Right, cell containing a KC near or attached to a polar MT bundle. (D–F) Image sequences; arrowhead indicates cen2 KC marker. (D) Wild-type cell illustrating lost KC reeling in, biorientation, segregation, and anaphase spindle elongation. See Supplemental Movie S1. (E) 5+6∆ cell illustrating lost KC reeling in, biorientation, spindle length fluctuations, segregation with lagging chromosome, and anaphase spindle elongation. See Supplemental Movie S2. (F) 5∆6+ cell illustrating KC reeling in, pushing, and biorientation. See Supplemental Movie S3. Scale bars, 1 μm.
Effects of cold treatment on cell viability.
| Strain | Doubling time (h, fit ± error) | Doubling time after cold treatment (h, fit ± error) | Increase in doubling time (value ± error) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type | 2.49 ± 0.10 | 3.58 ± 0.25 | 1.44 ± 0.12 |
| 5+6∆ | 2.65 ± 0.05 | 3.01 ± 0.05 | 1.14 ± 0.03 |
| 5∆6+ | 2.51 ± 0.11 | 3.12 ± 0.15 | 1.24 ± 0.08 |
| 5∆6∆ | 2.56 ± 0.05 | 3.38 ± 0.18 | 1.32 ± 0.07 |
Growth rates of strains of each genotype were measured before and after induction of lost KCs by cold treatment. Growth rates increased similarly for all strains.
FIGURE 2:Kinetochore movements after microtubule repolymerization. (A–I) Schematics and images. Green arrowheads indicate KC marker. (A–C) Schematic and image sequences illustrating reeling in of a lost KC to the SPB. In B, GFP tagged the SPBs and cen2 KC marker in a wild-type cell; successive images are 15 s apart. In C, mCherry additionally tagged MTs in a 5+6∆ cell; successive images are 25 s apart. See Supplemental Movie S4. (D–F) Schematic and image sequences illustrating KC pushing. In E, GFP tagged the SPBs and cen2 KC marker in a 5∆6∆ cell; successive images are 2.5 min apart. See Supplemental Movie S5. In F, mCherry additionally tagged MTs in a 5∆6+ cell; successive images are 1.16 min apart. See Supplemental Movie S6. (G, H) Schematic and image sequences illustrating hovering of the KC near the SPB in 5∆6∆ cell; successive images are 1.25 min apart. See Supplemental Movie S7. (I) Nuclear envelope deformation in 5+6∆ cell with long polar MTs. Left, mCherry channel showing polar MTs. Center, GFP channel showing SPBs and soluble nuclear GFP illustrating the deformation of the nuclear envelope by the MTs. Right, merge. Scale bars, 1 μm. (J) Fraction of cells of different strains exhibiting pushing and hovering, which was never observed in wild-type cells. Error bars are SD of a binomial distribution. (K) Fraction of cells of different strains for which a lost KC had reeled in to the SPB by different times after temperature shift. Error bars are SD of a binomial distribution. (L) Length distribution of mitotic polar MT bundles in different strains with exponential fits. In middle and bottom, the first two bins were excluded from the fit. Errors in characteristic length are uncertainties from fit. (M) Table quantifying reeling time, initial lost KC fraction, reeling speed, and length change. (N) Examples of 3D SPB-KC distance vs. time, illustrating reeling and pushing movements. Solid lines indicate reeling events with fits to determine speed. (O) Histograms of reeling speeds in different strains.
FIGURE 3:Kinetochore pushing movements and tripolar mitotic spindles. Schematics and images of cells containing SPBs tagged with sid4-mCherry SPB marker and microtubules tagged with mCherry-atb2 under a weak promoter (red, top), kinetochores tagged with mis6-GFP and mis12-GFP (green, middle), and merged images (bottom), all in the 5∆6+ background. (A) Chromosome-pushing movements showing KC (arrowhead) near the end of a polar MT. See Supplemental Movies S9 and S10. (B) Tripolar mitotic spindle showing KC (arrowhead) colocalized with two bright and one dim SPB. See Supplemental Movie S11. (C) Chromosome- pushing movements and tripolar spindle formation in the same cell. Initial images show spindle with polar MT extending up and right. At 4:30, the upper left SPB appears to split, forming a tripolar spindle that persists until the last frame. Also at 4:30, a KC (arrowhead) begins moving up and right along the polar MT, then reels back in to the SPB in the last two frames. See Supplemental Movie S12. Scale bars, 1 μm. (D) Comparison of KC brightness per cell in cells with apparently normal KC dynamics (left, 268 images from eight cells) and aberrant dynamics (right, 513 images from 13 cells).
FIGURE 4:Mitotic kinesin-8 localization. Images of cells containing fluorescently tagged Klp5/6 with and without the partner protein. (A) Fixed-cell images with mCherry-tagged α-tubulin (red), GFP-tagged Klp5/6 (green), DAPI-stained DNA (blue), and merged image (right). Images were taken with identical exposure conditions for each cell and brightness and contrast settings for the green channel. (B) Live-cell images with mCherry-tagged α-tubulin (red), GFP-tagged Klp5/6 (green), and merged image (right). Images were taken with identical exposure conditions for each cell and brightness and contrast settings for the green channel. (C, D) Live-cell images with mCherry-tagged α-tubulin (red), GFP-tagged Klp5/6 (green), and merged image (right), acquired with a newer EMCCD camera and displayed with brightness and contrast adjustment. (E, F) Live-cell time-lapse images with mCherry-tagged α-tubulin (red), GFP-tagged Klp5/6 (green), and merged image (right) acquired with a newer EMCCD camera and displayed with brightness and contrast adjustment. Sequential images are separated by 5 min. Scale bars, 1 μm. (G) Summary statistics of mitotic Klp5/6 localization in the absence of the partner motor. Data indicate fraction of structures with GFP labeling. Klp5-GFP spindle and near-SPB localization data are from 50 cells, and polar MT localization data are from 17 cells with observable polar MTs. Klp6-GFP localization data are from 50 cells, and polar MT localization data are from 15 cells with observable polar MTs. Error bars are SD of a binomial distribution. Differences between 5GFP6∆ and 5∆6GFP cells were statistically significant for all three types of localization studied (see the text).
FIGURE 5:Biorientation. (A, B) Schematic and image sequences of biorientation in wild-type and kinesin-8–deletion cells; successive images are 1 min apart. See Supplemental Movies S13 and S14. Scale bars, 1 μm. Arrowheads indicate KC marker. (C) Fraction of cells of different strains for which a KC has bioriented by different times after temperature shift. Error bars are SDs of a binomial distribution. (D) Quantification of time to biorientation. (E) Examples of 3D SPB-KC distance and sister KC separation vs. time, showing biorientation, KC movement along the spindle, and sister KC breathing. (F, G) Quantification of KC position along the spindle. Note different y-axis scales for different strains. (F) Histograms of absolute distance of bioriented KCs from reeling SPB. (G) Same data as in F, plotted as fractional position between the two SPBs. (H) Histograms of sister KC separation. Note different y-axis scales for different strains and that the height of the large peak at zero separation is not shown.
FIGURE 6:Spindle length dynamics. (A) Schematic of spindle length fluctuations, with green dots representing SPBs, red bars representing the mitotic spindle, and black lines representing the nuclear envelope. (B) Examples of mitotic spindle length (represented by 3D SPB-SPB distance) illustrating short, stable spindle lengths in wild-type cells and longer, fluctuating spindle lengths in kinesin-8–deletion cells. (C) Examples of spindle length vs. time, with chromosome segregation events indicated by large circles. (D) Temporal autocorrelation function of fluctuations in spindle length.
Results of automated analysis of spindle length and length change events.
| Strain | Spindle length (μm, mean ± SEM) | Length change shortening (μm, mean ± SEM) | Length change lengthening (μm, mean ± SEM) | Duration shortening (min, mean ± SEM) | Duration lengthening (min, mean ± SEM) | Speed shortening (μm/min, mean ± SEM) | Speed lengthening (μm/min, mean ± SEM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild type | 1.79 ± 0.12 ( | 0.40 ± 0.06 ( | 0.60 ± 0.06 ( | 2.01 ± 0.08 | 2.63 ± 0.13 | −0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.02 |
| 5+6∆ | 4.45 ± 0.22 ( | 1.02 ± 0.20 (N = 37) | 1.56 ± 0.17 ( | 2.78 ± 0.20 | 5.05 ± 0.37 | −0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.29 ± 0.01 |
| 5∆6+ | 3.17 ± 0.28 ( | 1.30 ± 0.31 (N = 28) | 1.28 ± 0.18 ( | 3.18 ± 0.40 | 4.21 ± 0.47 | −0.40 ± 0.06 | 0.30 ± 0.02 |
| 5∆6∆ | 3.46 ± 0.18 | 0.74 ± 0.12 (N = 38) | 1.80 ± 0.25 ( | 2.36 ± 0.14 | 5.07 ± 0.57 | −0.33 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.02 |
FIGURE 7:Chromosome segregation. (A, B) Schematic and image sequence of a lagging chromosome; successive images are 15 s apart. See Supplemental Movie S15. Scale bar, 1 μm. Arrowheads indicate KC marker. (C) Fraction of cells of different strains exhibiting lagging chromosomes. Error bars are SDs of a binomial distribution. (D) Fraction of cells of different strains for which chromosome segregation has occurred by different times after temperature shift. Error bars are SDs of a binomial distribution. (E) Examples of quantification of 3D SPB-KC distance of each sister KC from the SPB to which it is segregated. Solid lines indicate segregation events with fits to determine speed. (F) Histogram of segregation speeds in different strains. (G) Quantification of segregation events.
FIGURE 8:Anaphase spindle elongation. (A–D) Schematics and images of anaphase spindle elongation and nuclear envelope deformation in 5+6∆ cells. Left, spindle (red); center, SPBs and soluble nuclear GFP (green); right, merged image. (A, C) Nuclear envelope deformation into a peanut-like shape. (B, D) Nuclear envelope deformation by extension of a narrow tether. Scale bars, 1 μm. (E) Example of spindle length (represented by 3D SPB-SPB distance) vs. time during anaphase spindle elongation. Solid line indicates elongation event with fit to determine speed. (F) Histogram of elongation speeds in different strains. (G) Quantification of elongation events.
FIGURE 9:Microtubule bundle model. (A, B) Schematic and key model features. (C) Wild-type model results, including experimental and model simulated traces (left), SPB-KC length distribution (center), and temporal autocorrelation of fluctuations in SPB-KC length (right). (D) 5+6∆ model results. (E) 5∆ model results.
Pushing-bundle model fixed parameters.
| Value | Reference | |
|---|---|---|
| MT growth force constant (pN/μm) | 8.4 | |
| MT shrinking force constant (pN/μm) | 3.0 | |
| MT catastrophe force constant (pN/μm) | 2.3 | |
| MT rescue force constant (pN/μm) | 6.4 | |
| MT unbinding force constant (pN/μm) | 4.0 | |
| MT polymerization stall force (pN) | 12 | Chosen |
| Nuclear envelope deformation force (pN) | 17 (bundle), 14.5 (spindle) | For a tether of radius 50 (bundle) or 100 nm (spindle), the tether extension force = 2 |
| Unbound KC diffusion coefficient (μm2/min) | 0.084 | |
| MT-KC interaction distance (nm) | 100 (bundle), 10 (spindle) | Chosen |
| MT-KC linkage spring constant (pN/μm) | 40 |
Model parameters that were different in parameter sets corresponding to different strains.
| Wild type | 5+6∆ | 5∆ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bundle and spindle model | |||
| Growth speed (μm/min) | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| Shrinking speed (μm/min) | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Catastrophe frequency (min−1) | 0.5 + 0.1875 | 0.15 (attached), 0.015 (unattached) | 0.015 |
| Rescue frequency (min−1) | 1.0 | 0.1 (attached), 0.04 (unattached) | 0.04 |
| Unbinding rate of growing MT (min−1) | 10−4 | 6 × 10−3 b | 6 × 10−3 b |
| Unbinding rate of shrinking MT (min−1) | 10−3 | 4.8 × 10−2 b | 4.8 × 10−2 b |
| Bundle model only | |||
| Attachment frequency (min−1) | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Nucleation frequency (min−1) | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 |
| Initial MT number | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| Spindle model only | |||
| Sliding force (pN) | 13 | 14 | 4 |
Parameters were determined through comparison to experimental data except as noted.
aFunctional form of Tischer : the rate of increase of catastrophe frequency with length is 37.5% of the bare catastrophe frequency.
b Akiyoshi .
FIGURE 10:Spindle force balance model. (A, B) Schematic and key model features. (C, E, G) Experimental and simulated spindle length vs. time. (D, F, H) Distribution of KC positions along the spindle. (C, D) Wild-type model results. (E, F) 5+6∆ model results. (G, H) 5∆ model results.
Spindle force balance model fixed parameters.
| Value | Reference | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of KCs per half-spindle | 3 | |
| Number of MTs per KC | 3 | |
| Nuclear radius (μm) | 1 onset, 1.2 max | Our observations |
| Maximum MT shrinking speed (μm/min) | 30 | |
| Inter-KC linkage spring constant (pN/μm) | 5 | Reduced slightly from |
| Sister KC overlap spring constant (pN/μm) | 20 | Chosen larger than linkage spring constant |
| Sister KC offset (nm) | 50 | Chosen |
| MT-SPB overlap spring constant (pN/μm) | 40 | Chosen |
| SPB friction coefficient (pN min/μm) | 25 |
FIGURE 11:Conceptual model of Klp5/6 mitotic effects.
Strains used in this study.
| Strain | Genotype | Source |
|---|---|---|
| McI730 | This study | |
| McI718 | This study | |
| McI731 | This study | |
| McI765 | This study | |
| McI770 | This study | |
| McI773 | This study | |
| McI721 | This study | |
| McI746 | This study | |
| McI748 | This study | |
| McI726 | This study | |
| McI833 | This study | |
| McI837 | This study | |
| McI847 | This study | |
| Original Strains | ||
| K39 | R. McIntosh and E. Grishchuk | |
| K41 | R. McIntosh and E. Grishchuk | |
| K64 | R. McIntosh and E. Grishchuk | |
| K70 | R. McIntosh and E. Grishchuk | |
| McI397 | R. McIntosh | |
| McI381 | R. McIntosh | |
| McI485 | R. McIntosh | |
| McI486 | R. McIntosh | |
| McI487 | R. McIntosh | |
| McI488 | R. McIntosh | |
| McI728 | Y. Wantanabe | |
| AR614 | T. Toda | |
| AR615 | T. Toda | |
| AR616 | T. Toda | |
| AR617 | T. Toda | |
| JCF9907 | J. Cooper |