Literature DB >> 26415043

Partial Correlation-Based Retinotopically Organized Resting-State Functional Connectivity Within and Between Areas of the Visual Cortex Reflects More Than Cortical Distance.

Debra Ann Dawson1,2, Jack Lam1,2, Lindsay B Lewis1,3, Felix Carbonell1,2, Janine D Mendola1,3, Amir Shmuel1,2,4.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) between cortical areas. Recent evidence suggests that synchronous fluctuations in blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI reflect functional organization at a scale finer than that of visual areas. In this study, we investigated whether RSFCs within and between lower visual areas are retinotopically organized and whether retinotopically organized RSFC merely reflects cortical distance. Subjects underwent retinotopic mapping and separately resting-state fMRI. Visual areas V1, V2, and V3, were subdivided into regions of interest (ROIs) according to quadrants and visual field eccentricity. Functional connectivity (FC) was computed based on Pearson's linear correlation (correlation), and Pearson's linear partial correlation (correlation between two time courses after the time courses from all other regions in the network are regressed out). Within a quadrant, within visual areas, all correlation and nearly all partial correlation FC measures showed statistical significance. Consistently in V1, V2, and to a lesser extent in V3, correlation decreased with increasing eccentricity separation. Consistent with previously reported monkey anatomical connectivity, correlation/partial correlation values between regions from adjacent areas (V1-V2 and V2-V3) were higher than those between nonadjacent areas (V1-V3). Within a quadrant, partial correlation showed consistent significance between regions from two different areas with the same or adjacent eccentricities. Pairs of ROIs with similar eccentricity showed higher correlation/partial correlation than pairs distant in eccentricity. Between dorsal and ventral quadrants, partial correlation between common and adjacent eccentricity regions within a visual area showed statistical significance; this extended to more distant eccentricity regions in V1. Within and between quadrants, correlation decreased approximately linearly with increasing distances separating the tested ROIs. Partial correlation showed a more complex dependence on cortical distance: it decreased exponentially with increasing distance within a quadrant, but was best fit by a quadratic function between quadrants. We conclude that RSFCs within and between lower visual areas are retinotopically organized. Correlation-based FC is nonselectively high across lower visual areas, even between regions that do not share direct anatomical connections. The mechanisms likely involve network effects caused by the dense anatomical connectivity within this network and projections from higher visual areas. FC based on partial correlation, which minimizes network effects, follows expectations based on direct anatomical connections in the monkey visual cortex better than correlation. Last, partial correlation-based retinotopically organized RSFC reflects more than cortical distance effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  V1; V2; V3; correlation; functional connectivity; partial correlation; resting-state; resting-state networks; retinotopic organization; retinotopy; spontaneous activity; visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26415043      PMCID: PMC4744894          DOI: 10.1089/brain.2014.0331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Connect        ISSN: 2158-0014


  55 in total

Review 1.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Evaluation and calibration of functional network modeling methods based on known anatomical connections.

Authors:  Debra Ann Dawson; Kuwook Cha; Lindsay B Lewis; Janine D Mendola; Amir Shmuel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The relationship between cortical magnification factor and population receptive field size in human visual cortex: constancies in cortical architecture.

Authors:  Ben M Harvey; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Corticocortical connections in the visual system: structure and function.

Authors:  P A Salin; J Bullier
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  A predictive network model of cerebral cortical connectivity based on a distance rule.

Authors:  Mária Ercsey-Ravasz; Nikola T Markov; Camille Lamy; David C Van Essen; Kenneth Knoblauch; Zoltán Toroczkai; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Finding thalamic BOLD correlates to posterior alpha EEG.

Authors:  Zhongming Liu; Jacco A de Zwart; Bing Yao; Peter van Gelderen; Li-Wei Kuo; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Independent sources of spontaneous BOLD fluctuation along the visual pathway.

Authors:  Jacco A de Zwart; Peter van Gelderen; Zhongming Liu; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Weight consistency specifies regularities of macaque cortical networks.

Authors:  N T Markov; P Misery; A Falchier; C Lamy; J Vezoli; R Quilodran; M A Gariel; P Giroud; M Ercsey-Ravasz; L J Pilaz; C Huissoud; P Barone; C Dehay; Z Toroczkai; D C Van Essen; H Kennedy; K Knoblauch
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  8 in total

1.  EECoG-Comp: An Open Source Platform for Concurrent EEG/ECoG Comparisons-Applications to Connectivity Studies.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Pedro Antonio Valdés-Hernández; Deirel Paz-Linares; Jorge Bosch-Bayard; Naoya Oosugi; Misako Komatsu; Naotaka Fujii; Pedro Antonio Valdés-Sosa
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Default-mode network streams for coupling to language and control systems.

Authors:  Evan M Gordon; Timothy O Laumann; Scott Marek; Ryan V Raut; Caterina Gratton; Dillan J Newbold; Deanna J Greene; Rebecca S Coalson; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen; Nico U F Dosenbach; Steven M Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spontaneous activity in the visual cortex is organized by visual streams.

Authors:  Kun-Han Lu; Jun Young Jeong; Haiguang Wen; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Reorganization of early visual cortex functional connectivity following selective peripheral and central visual loss.

Authors:  Norman Sabbah; Nicolae Sanda; Colas N Authié; Saddek Mohand-Saïd; José-Alain Sahel; Christophe Habas; Amir Amedi; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Multi-scale brain networks.

Authors:  Richard F Betzel; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Reproducibility of graph measures at the subject level using resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Qian Ran; Tarik Jamoulle; Jolien Schaeverbeke; Karen Meersmans; Rik Vandenberghe; Patrick Dupont
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Positive and Negative Somatotopic BOLD Responses in Contralateral Versus Ipsilateral Penfield Homunculus.

Authors:  Zohar Tal; Ran Geva; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Modulatory effects of dynamic fMRI-based neurofeedback on emotion regulation networks in adolescent females.

Authors:  Catharina Zich; Nicola Johnstone; Michael Lührs; Stephen Lisk; Simone Pw Haller; Annalisa Lipp; Jennifer Yf Lau; Kathrin Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.