Literature DB >> 26414967

Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.

Ali S Raja, Jeffrey O Greenberg, Amir Qaseem, Thomas D Denberg, Nick Fitterman, Jeremiah D Schuur.   

Abstract

DESCRIPTION: Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be a severe disease and is difficult to diagnose, given its nonspecific signs and symptoms. Because of this, testing patients with suspected acute PE has increased dramatically. However, the overuse of some tests, particularly computed tomography (CT) and plasma d-dimer measurement, may not improve care while potentially leading to patient harm and unnecessary expense.
METHODS: The literature search encompassed studies indexed by MEDLINE (1966-2014; English-language only) and included all clinical trials and meta-analyses on diagnostic strategies, decision rules, laboratory tests, and imaging studies for the diagnosis of PE. This document is not based on a formal systematic review, but instead seeks to provide practical advice based on the best available evidence and recent guidelines. The target audience for this paper is all clinicians; the target patient population is all adults, both inpatient and outpatient, suspected of having acute PE. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians should use validated clinical prediction rules to estimate pretest probability in patients in whom acute PE is being considered. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians should not obtain d-dimer measurements or imaging studies in patients with a low pretest probability of PE and who meet all Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should obtain a high-sensitivity d-dimer measurement as the initial diagnostic test in patients who have an intermediate pretest probability of PE or in patients with low pretest probability of PE who do not meet all Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria. Clinicians should not use imaging studies as the initial test in patients who have a low or intermediate pretest probability of PE. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Clinicians should use age-adjusted d-dimer thresholds (age × 10 ng/mL rather than a generic 500 ng/mL) in patients older than 50 years to determine whether imaging is warranted. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Clinicians should not obtain any imaging studies in patients with a d-dimer level below the age-adjusted cutoff. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians should obtain imaging with CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with high pretest probability of PE. Clinicians should reserve ventilation-perfusion scans for patients who have a contraindication to CTPA or if CTPA is not available. Clinicians should not obtain a d-dimer measurement in patients with a high pretest probability of PE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26414967     DOI: 10.7326/M14-1772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  53 in total

1.  Poor performance of D-dimer in excluding venous thromboembolism among patients with lymphoma and leukemia.

Authors:  Aiham Qdaisat; Rawan Al Soud; Carol C Wu; Cristhiam M Rojas Hernandez; Jieli Li; Qing H Meng; Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Application of human factors to improve usability of clinical decision support for diagnostic decision-making: a scenario-based simulation study.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Megan Salwei; Douglas Wiegmann; Roger L Brown; Peter Kleinschmidt; Clair Novak; Michael Pulia; Yudi Wang; Emily Wirkus; Brian Patterson
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Yield of CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Department When Providers Override Evidence-based Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Zihao Yan; Ivan K Ip; Ali S Raja; Anurag Gupta; Joshua M Kosowsky; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Initial experience with cinematic rendering for chest cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  CT Pulmonary Angiography in Young Women.

Authors:  Paul D Stein; Fadi Matta; Kate E Hughes; Mary J Hughes
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.389

6.  Normal D-dimer levels in cancer patients with radiologic evidence of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Aiham Qdaisat; Carol C Wu; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Michael B Streiff; Giancarlo Agnelli; Jean M Connors; Mark Crowther; Sabine Eichinger; Renato Lopes; Robert D McBane; Stephan Moll; Jack Ansell
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: an update.

Authors:  Alastair J E Moore; Jason Wachsmann; Murthy R Chamarthy; Lloyd Panjikaran; Yuki Tanabe; Prabhakar Rajiah
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-06

9.  Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of incidental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.

Authors:  Aiham Qdaisat; Mona Kamal; Aisha Al-Breiki; Biman Goswami; Carol C Wu; Shouhao Zhou; Terry W Rice; Kumar Alagappan; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-04-28

10.  Reliability of the CARE rule and the HEART score to rule out an acute coronary syndrome in non-traumatic chest pain patients.

Authors:  Thomas Moumneh; Vanessa Richard-Jourjon; Emilie Friou; Fabrice Prunier; Caroline Soulie-Chavignon; Jacques Choukroun; Betty Mazet-Guilaumé; Jérémie Riou; Andréa Penaloza; Pierre-Marie Roy
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.