Literature DB >> 26414961

HIV-positive blood donors unaware of their sexual at-risk behaviours before donation in Italy.

M Raimondo1, G Facco2, V Regine1, S Pupella2, G Grazzini2, B Suligoi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the procedures adopted for the selection of blood donors, in Italy the HIV prevalence per 100 000 repeat tested donors (RTD) and first-time tested donors (FTD) is high compared to most other Council of Europe member states. To evaluate the effectiveness of predonation procedures, we studied both the characteristics and the undisclosed risk behaviours of HIV-positive donors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed the data from the Italian blood donor surveillance system in 2009, 2010 and 2011. Based on the postdonation interview, HIV-positive donors were classified by risk behaviour (heterosexual, MSM, 'non-sexual' and 'not determined') and by time elapsed from risk behaviour to donation. In Italy, the temporary deferral for exposure to behaviour at risk is 4 months.
RESULTS: In the postdonation interview, 113 HIV-positive donors (32·4%), who denied at-risk behaviours in the predonation selection, reported sexual risk behaviours <4 months prior to donation; they were predominantly males (84·1%) and RTD (63·7%). The main reason for not having reported the risk behaviour in the predonation selection was 'not realizing having engaged in at-risk behaviour' (66·4%).
CONCLUSION: These findings underline the need for more comprehensible educational material, a clearer predonation questionnaire, and effective information campaigns to improve the awareness of HIV sexual risk behaviours among blood donors.
© 2015 International Society of Blood Transfusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; at-risk behaviour; awareness; blood donors; sexual behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26414961     DOI: 10.1111/vox.12328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


  9 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence for the change in the blood -donation deferral period for high-risk groups and does it go far enough?

Authors:  Beattie Rh Sturrock; Stuart Mucklow
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Blood donor deferral policies across Europe and characteristics of men whohave sex with men screened for human immunodeficiency virus in bloodestablishments: data from the European Men-who-have-sex-with-men Internet Survey (EMIS).

Authors:  Susanne B Schink; Ruth Offergeld; Axel J Schmidt; Ulrich Marcus
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Importance of information provision in the acceptance of blood donation criteria by the general public in Belgium.

Authors:  Bert Avau; Emmy De Buck; Philippe Vandekerckhove; Veerle Compernolle
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Good Feasibility of the New German Blood Donor Questionnaire.

Authors:  Claudia Houareau; Robert Deitenbeck; Ariane Sümnig; Anette Moeller; Christiane Saadé; Frank Stötzer; Margarethe Heiden; Hinnak Northoff; Ruth Offergeld
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 5.  Selecting the Right Donors - Still a Challenge: Development of a Uniform Donor Questionnaire in Germany.

Authors:  Ruth Offergeld; Margarethe Heiden
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.747

6.  Which Infectious Blood Donors Could Be Identified by the Donor History Questionnaire? - Comparison of Blood Donors Infected with HIV or HCV with Notified Cases from General Population in Germany.

Authors:  Karina Preußel; Ruth Offergeld
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.747

7.  Comment to: Test seeking: are health care professionals referring people to the blood centers for infectious markers testing?

Authors:  José Eduardo Levi
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2019-07-26

8.  Science over stigma: the need for evidence-based blood donation policies for men who have sex with men in the USA.

Authors:  Ashwin N Skelly; Likhitha Kolla; Margaret K Tamburro; Katharine J Bar
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 18.959

9.  Sexual risk behavior questions: Understanding and mitigating donor discomfort.

Authors:  Jennie Haw; Hyunjin Woo; Taylor Kohut; William Fisher
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.337

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.