Literature DB >> 29765294

Which Infectious Blood Donors Could Be Identified by the Donor History Questionnaire? - Comparison of Blood Donors Infected with HIV or HCV with Notified Cases from General Population in Germany.

Karina Preußel1, Ruth Offergeld1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Potential risks for transfusion-transmissible infections are identified by donor history questionnaires (DHQs), and donors with higher risks are deferred from donation. We assessed to which extent the currently used DHQs support the identification of infections among blood donors.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2013, we analyzed data from notified HIV and HCV cases in the general population and positive blood donors in Germany. Logistic regressions were used to identify relevant infection risks. We estimated the possible effect of improved capture of risk factors for donor selection by calculation of population attributable fractions (PAF).
RESULTS: Risky sexual contacts - MSM as well as heterosexual contacts - were the most prominent infection risks among HIV-infected donors. Whereas MSM contacts were significantly less reported by donors than by cases from the general population, 58% of donors disclosed heterosexual risks compared to 26% of notified cases. The complete identification of heterosexual risk contacts might prevent acceptance of 53% of HIV-infected donors. HCV-infected donors were more likely to report heterosexual exposure, imprisonment, and piercing/tattoo than notified HCV cases. Improved recording of piercing/tattoo could prevent acceptance of 16% of HCV-infected donors.
CONCLUSION: Donor selection should be improved with special attention to the identification of (hetero)sexual risk factors, invasive procedures (piercing/tattoo and imprisonment) applying well-designed DHQs, effective donor education, and confidential environment in all steps of the selection process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Donor selection; Risk factors; Transfusion-transmissible infections

Year:  2018        PMID: 29765294      PMCID: PMC5939657          DOI: 10.1159/000481829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother        ISSN: 1660-3796            Impact factor:   3.747


  25 in total

1.  Reducing the risk of transfusion-transmissible viral infection through blood donor selection: the Australian experience 2000 through 2006.

Authors:  Mark N Polizzotto; Erica M Wood; Helen Ingham; Anthony J Keller
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Evaluation of a new German blood donor questionnaire.

Authors:  A Sümnig; H Lembcke; H Weber; R Deitenbeck; K Greffin; J Bux; A Greinacher
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  Compliance with the current 12-month deferral for male-to-male sex in Australia.

Authors:  C R Seed; T T Lucky; D Waller; H Wand; J F Lee; S Wroth; A McDonald; J Pink; D P Wilson; A J Keller
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Motivations for donating and attitudes toward screening policies in US blood donors with viral infection.

Authors:  Farnaz Vahidnia; Susan L Stramer; Debra Kessler; Thelma T Gonçalez; Beth H Shaz; German Leparc; David E Krysztof; Roger Y Dodd; Simone A Glynn; Brian Custer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Epidemiological Data - an Important Part of the Hemovigilance System.

Authors:  Ruth Offergeld; Osamah Hamouda; Reinhard Burger
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.747

6.  Risk factors for hepatitis B and C infection among blood donors in five Chinese blood centers.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Nan Guo; Qilu Yu; Yunlai Lv; Hongli Ma; Zhongqiao Yun; Fuzhu Yao; Xiangdong Dong; Xiangming Zhu; Xiuqiong Wen; Ruan Cao; Mei Huang; Xinhong Bi; Mingjiang Zhao; Mei-hei-li Tiemuer; Julin Li; Zhongmin Zhou; Weilan He; Jing Liu; David J Wright; Jingxing Wang; Paul Ness; Hua Shan
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Who gets tattoos? Demographic and behavioral correlates of ever being tattooed in a representative sample of men and women.

Authors:  Wendy Heywood; Kent Patrick; Anthony M A Smith; Judy M Simpson; Marian K Pitts; Juliet Richters; Julia M Shelley
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Predonation screening of candidate donors and prevention of window period donations.

Authors:  Ryanne W Lieshout-Krikke; Hans L Zaaijer; Thijs J W van de Laar
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Blood donor deferral for men who have sex with men: the Blood Donation Rules Opinion Study (Blood DROPS).

Authors:  Brian Custer; Nicolas Sheon; Bob Siedle-Khan; Lance Pollack; Bryan Spencer; Walter Bialkowski; Pam D'Andrea; Marian Sullivan; Simone Glynn; Alan Williams
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Views and experiences of men who have sex with men on the ban on blood donation: a cross sectional survey with qualitative interviews.

Authors:  P Grenfell; W Nutland; S McManus; J Datta; K Soldan; K Wellings
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-09-07
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fecal Microbiota Transfer.

Authors:  Andreas Stallmach; Arndt Steube; Philip Grunert; Michael Hartmann; Lena M Biehl; Maria J G T Vehreschild
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.594

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.