| Literature DB >> 26414682 |
Ricardo Luiz Pisciolaro1,2, Monica Talarico Duailibi1,2,3, Neil Ferreira Novo2,4, Yara Juliano2,4,5, Debora Pallos5, Pamela Crotty Yelick6, Joseph Phillip Vacanti7, Lydia Masako Ferreira2, Silvio Eduardo Duailibi1,2,3.
Abstract
One of the goals in using cells for tissue engineering (TE) and cell therapy consists of optimizing the medium for cell culture. The present study compares three different blood product supplements for improved cell proliferation and protection against DNA damage in cultured human dental pulp stem cells for tooth TE applications. Human cells from dental pulp were first characterized as adult stem cells (ectomesenchymal mixed origin) by flow cytometry. Next, four different cell culture conditions were tested: I, supplement-free; II, supplemented with fetal bovine serum; III, allogeneic human serum; and IV, autologous human serum. Cultured cells were then characterized for cell proliferation, mineralized nodule formation, and colony-forming units (CFU) capability. After 28 days in culture, the comet assay was performed to assess possible damage in cellular DNA. Our results revealed that Protocol IV achieved higher cell proliferation than Protocol I (p = 0.0112). Protocols II and III resulted in higher cell proliferation than Protocol I, but no statistical differences were found relative to Protocol IV. The comet assay revealed less cell damage in cells cultured using Protocol IV as compared to Protocols II and III. The damage percentage observed on Protocol II was significantly higher than all other protocols. CFUs capability was highest using Protocol IV (p = 0.0018) and III, respectively, and the highest degree of mineralization was observed using Protocol IV as compared to Protocols II and III. Protocol IV resulted in significantly improved cell proliferation, and no cell damage was observed. These results demonstrate that human blood product supplements can be used as feasible supplements for culturing adult human dental stem cells.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26414682 PMCID: PMC4652194 DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tissue Eng Part A ISSN: 1937-3341 Impact factor: 3.845