Literature DB >> 26411974

The influence of third molars in the line of mandibular angle fractures on wound and bone healing.

N Ulbrich1, T Ettl2, W Waiss1, M Gosau3, A Moralis1, T E Reichert1, S Mueller1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate postoperative complications after removal or retention of the third molar in the line of mandibular angle fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included the data of 98 patients with a molar in the line of a mandibular angle fracture treated with internal reduction and mini-plate fixation at our department over 9 years. Patients were classified into two groups: tooth removal during osteosynthesis (n = 45) and tooth retention (n = 55). The primary target criterion was the incidence of minor (outpatient treatment, local measures) and major (surgical revision, rehospitalisation) complications. Time between trauma and surgery was 1.4 days (range 0 to 12), and the average follow-up 291 days (range 66 to 863).
RESULTS: Regarding the eruption status, 26 of 52 (50.0 %) impacted third molars, 11 of 19 (57.9 %) incompletely erupted and 8 of 27 (29.6 %) completely erupted molars had been removed during open reduction. Overall, 17 (17.3 %) patients had postoperative minor (n = 7) or major (n = 10) complications, in detail 10/45 (22.0 %) patients after tooth removal and 7/55 (13 %) patients after tooth retention (p = 0.286). Complication rates between impacted and incompletely erupted third molars (impacted molars 15.0 %, incompletely erupted molars 10.0 %) did not differ significantly, but completely erupted molars had a complication rate of 26.0 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular angle fractures with a completely erupted third molar show the highest complication rate after open reduction and osteosynthesis. Retention of a non-infectious third molar facilitates open reduction and does not increase the complication risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study helps with the decision of removing or retention of a third molar during surgical treatment of a mandibular angle fracture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healing disorders; Infection; Mandibular angle fracture; Mini-plate osteosynthesis; Postoperative complication; Third molar

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26411974     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1612-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  28 in total

1.  Infection following treatment of mandible fractures: the role of immunosuppression and polysubstance abuse.

Authors:  Figen Cizmeci Senel; Gregory S Jessen; Maico D Melo; George Obeid
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-08-10

2.  Early immobilization of mandibular fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  P L Maloney; T B Welch; H C Doku
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  One- or two-plate fixation of mandibular angle fractures?

Authors:  H P Schierle; R Schmelzeisen; B Rahn; C Pytlik
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Morbidity associated with teeth in the line of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  D C Neal; W F Wagner; B Alpert
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1978-11

Review 5.  Postoperative infection associated with mandibular angle fracture treatment in the presence of teeth on the fracture line: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A N Bobrowski; C L Sonego; O L Chagas Junior
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 6.  Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle.

Authors:  E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  A review of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Ramiro Perez; John C Oeltjen; Seth R Thaller
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2011-06

8.  Open reduction and internal fixation of combined angle and body/symphysis fractures of the mandible: how much fixation is enough?

Authors:  Edward Ellis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 9.  Management of fractures through the angle of the mandible.

Authors:  Edward Ellis
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Infection rate in mandibular angle fractures treated with a 2.0-mm 8-hole curved strut plate.

Authors:  Peter Bui; Nagi Demian; Patrick Beetar
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  1 in total

1.  Complication rate in mandibular angle fractures-one vs. two plates: a 12-year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Raphael Ferrari; M Lanzer; D Wiedemeier; M Rücker; M Bredell
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-10-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.