Literature DB >> 2056367

Early immobilization of mandibular fractures: a retrospective study.

P L Maloney1, T B Welch, H C Doku.   

Abstract

This study reviews the treatment outcome of 204 fractures in 131 patients over a 33-month period. In the total group, an infection rate of 4.4% was experienced, which is comparable with other reports. However, in complaint patients immobilized within 72 hours of injury, there was a 0% incidence of bone infection in 111 fractures treated by closed reduction and a 2% (one case) incidence of bone infection in 50 fractures treated by open reduction. Thus, of the of 161 fractures treated by closed and/or open reduction with early immobilization in complaint patients, the incidence of posttreatment bone infection was 0.6%. It was not significant whether teeth in the line of fracture were retained or removed. This study supports the principle that compound fractures of the mandible should to be immobilized within 72 hours of the initial trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2056367     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80230-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  10 in total

1.  Mandibular fracture scoring system: for prediction of complications.

Authors:  D Prabhu Shankar; P Manodh; Pradeep Devadoss; Titus K Thomas
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-04-28

2.  A comparison of outcomes between immediate and delayed repair of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Leland Shayne Webb; Sumeet Makhijani; Manish Khanna; Mark J Burstein; Arthur N Falk; Dimitri J Koumanis; Jerome D Chao
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2009

3.  Transoral versus extraoral approach for mandibular angle fractures: A comparative study.

Authors:  Sathya Kumar Devireddy; R V Kishore Kumar; Rajasekhar Gali; Sridhar Reddy Kanubaddy; Mallikarjuna Rao Dasari; Mohammad Akheel
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

4.  Management of mandibular fractures in a developing country: a review of 314 cases from two urban centers in Nigeria.

Authors:  Wasiu L Adeyemo; Innocent O Iwegbu; Seidu A Bello; Eyituoyo Okoturo; Ademola A Olaitan; Akinola L Ladeinde; Mobolanle O Ogunlewe; Adegbenga A Adepoju; Olanrewaju A Taiwo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The influence of third molars in the line of mandibular angle fractures on wound and bone healing.

Authors:  N Ulbrich; T Ettl; W Waiss; M Gosau; A Moralis; T E Reichert; S Mueller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures by Two Conventional 2.0-mm Miniplates: A Retrospective Study of 389 Patients.

Authors:  Giuseppe Spinelli; Davide Lazzeri; Francesco Arcuri; Domenico Valente; Tommaso Agostini
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-04-14

7.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of early or delayed treatment upon healing of mandibular fractures: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Giath Gazal
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Analysis of Fractured Mandible Over Two Decades.

Authors:  Melike Oruç; Veysel Murat Işik; Yüksel Kankaya; Koray Gürsoy; Nezih Sungur; Gürcan Aslan; Uğur Koçer
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Treatment Delay Impact on Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nicholas Stone; Alex Corneman; Anthony R Sandre; Forough Farrokhyar; Achilleas Thoma; Michael J Cooper
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-06-18

10.  An Unusual Case of Ludwig's Angina Following Mandibular Fracture.

Authors:  Leyla Ozbek; Yinan Zhu; Benjamin Olley; Thomas Ringrose; Adrian Farrow
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.