Literature DB >> 26411307

Improving Communication on Intent of Chemotherapy Using QOPI Scores and PDSA Cycles.

Meghana Bansal1,2, Al-Ola Abdallah3,4, Angela Pennisi1,2, Konstantinos Arnaoutakis1, Issam Makhoul1, Paulette Mehta1,2.   

Abstract

Using the standardized ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) guidelines for assessing quality cancer care, we identified communication about intent of chemotherapy as an area needing improvement in our program at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) and the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (CAVHS). We organized training in communications on intent of treatment (palliative vs curative) and added optional checkboxes to our electronic templates for progress notes. Afterwards, we conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records of initially often randomly selected patient charts. The first 10 patient charts after 1 month of implementation showed intent of treatment in 80 % of charts compared to 74 % at baseline. We then changed checkboxes from mandatory to optional and reviewed 30 randomly selected patient charts. Intent of treatment was documented in 96.7 % of cases compared to 74 % at baseline. We also assessed patient satisfaction through surveys distributed in clinic. Patient satisfaction scores were close to 100 % for receiving clear information, understanding the reason for which they were receiving chemotherapy, and willingness of oncologists to listen carefully, to take time to answer questions, to explain things clearly, and to spend adequate time with them. In this study, we showed that training in communication of intent of chemotherapy and use of checkboxes in progress note templates could improve competency in communication of intent of therapy in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intent of chemotherapy; Quality Oncology Practice Initiative

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26411307     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0897-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  4 in total

1.  Study designs for PDSA quality improvement research.

Authors:  Theodore Speroff; Gerald T O'Connor
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.926

2.  Peer-assisted learning from three perspectives: student, tutor and co-ordinator.

Authors:  Elspeth Hill; Francesca Liuzzi; James Giles
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2010-12

3.  The quality oncology practice initiative: assessing and improving care within the medical oncology practice.

Authors:  Kristen McNiff
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Peer feedback as an aid to learning--what do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!

Authors:  Annie Cushing; Stephen Abbott; Doug Lothian; Angela Hall; Olwyn M R Westwood
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Efficacy and unintended consequences of hard-stop alerts in electronic health record systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily M Powers; Richard N Shiffman; Edward R Melnick; Andrew Hickner; Mona Sharifi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.