Literature DB >> 26410348

Portosystemic Shunts: Stable Utilization and Improved Outcomes, Two Decades After the Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

Brandon C Perry1, Sharon W Kwan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess national trends in utilization, demographics, hospital characteristics, and outcomes of patients undergoing surgical or percutaneous portal decompression since the introduction of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgical portal decompression and TIPS procedures was conducted using Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files from January 2003 through December 2013 and National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample data from 1993, 2003, and 2012. Utilization rates normalized to the annual number of Medicare enrollees, estimated means, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS: The Medicare total annual utilization rate per million for all portosystemic decompression procedures decreased by 6.5% during the study period, from 15.3 in 2003 to 14.3 in 2013. TIPS utilization increased by 19.4% (from 10.3 to 12.3 per million), whereas open surgical shunt utilization decreased by 60.0% (from 5.0 to 2.0 per million). TIPS procedures represented 86% of all procedures in 2013. From 1993 to 2012, mean age increased slightly (from 53.0 to 55.5 years, P < .05). The percentage of procedures performed at teaching hospitals increased, whereas in-hospital mortality and length of stay decreased by 42% (P < .05) and 20% (P < .05), respectively. Of factors evaluated, the performance of procedures on an elective basis was the most influential on in-hospital mortality (P < .01, all years studied) and length of stay (P < .0001, all years studied).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two decades after the introduction of TIPS, the utilization of all portal decompression procedures has remained relatively stable. The TIPS procedure represents the dominant portal decompression technique. In-hospital mortality and mean length of stay after decompression have decreased, partially because of the performance of procedures during elective admissions.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TIPS; Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; interventional radiology; portal decompression; portal hypertension; utilization trends

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26410348      PMCID: PMC4663136          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  28 in total

1.  National trends in percutaneous cholecystostomy between 1994 and 2009: perspectives from Medicare provider claims.

Authors:  Richard Duszak; Stephen W Behrman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Impact of hospital and surgeon volumes in the management of complicated portal hypertension: review of a statewide database in Florida.

Authors:  Emmanuel E Zervos; Dana Osborne; Steven C Agle; Micheal M McNally; Brian Boe; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Effect of advanced imaging technology on how biopsies are done and who does them.

Authors:  Sharon W Kwan; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Robert K Kerlan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evolving roles of radiologists, nephrologists, and surgeons in endovascular hemodialysis access maintenance procedures.

Authors:  Richard Duszak; Laurence Parker; David C Levin; Vijay M Rao
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Surgical shunting versus transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunting for bleeding varices resulting from portal hypertension and cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Whalen Clark; Jonathan Hernandez; Brianne McKeon; Desiree Villadolid; Sam Al-Saadi; John Mullinax; Sharona B Ross; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Assessing the experience in complex hepatopancreatobiliary surgery among graduating chief residents: is the operative experience enough?

Authors:  Teviah E Sachs; Aslam Ejaz; Matthew Weiss; Gaya Spolverato; Nita Ahuja; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Covered vs. uncovered stents for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jean Marc Perarnau; Amélie Le Gouge; Charlotte Nicolas; Louis d'Alteroche; Patrick Borentain; Faouzi Saliba; Anne Minello; Rodolphe Anty; Carine Chagneau-Derrode; Pierre Henri Bernard; Armand Abergel; Isabelle Ollivier-Hourmand; Jérome Gournay; Jean Ayoub; Christophe Gaborit; Emmanuel Rusch; Bruno Giraudeau
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 8.  Treatment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Khurram Bari; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  MELD score is better than Child-Pugh score in predicting 3-month survival of patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Authors:  Francesco Salerno; Manuela Merli; Massimo Cazzaniga; Valentina Valeriano; Plinio Rossi; Andrea Lovaria; Daniele Meregaglia; Antonio Nicolini; Lorenzo Lubatti; Oliviero Riggio
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 10.  Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and portal hypertension-related complications.

Authors:  Sith Siramolpiwat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  7 in total

1.  Current Indications and Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Portosystemic Shunts in Adults.

Authors:  Indrani Sen; Lavanya Yohanathan; Jussi M Kärkkäinen; David M Nagorney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  EUS-guided intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with direct portal pressure measurements: a novel alternative to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting.

Authors:  Allison R Schulman; Marvin Ryou; Hiro Aihara; Wasif Abidi; Austin Chiang; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Ayman Sakr; Eduarda Ajeje; Michele B Ryan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Good Clinical Outcomes in Budd-Chiari Syndrome with Hepatic Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Xinxin Fan; Kai Liu; Yuan Che; Shikai Wang; Xingjiang Wu; Jianmin Cao; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Image guided portal vein access techniques in TIPS creation and considerations regarding their use.

Authors:  Aung Zaw Win
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-06

5.  Race and Gradient Difference Are Associated with Increased Risk of Hepatic Encephalopathy Hospital Admission After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement.

Authors:  Michael W Rowley; Myunghan Choi; Steve Chen; Kevin Hirsch; Anil B Seetharam
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-30

6.  Pathological Predictors of Shunt Stenosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

Authors:  Fuliang He; Shan Dai; Zhibo Xiao; Lei Wang; Zhendong Yue; Hongwei Zhao; Mengfei Zhao; Qiushi Lin; Xiaoqun Dong; Fuquan Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Anatomic Variations of the Right Portal Vein: Prevalence, Imaging Features, and Implications for Successful Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation.

Authors:  Senthil S Gunasekaran; Ron C Gaba
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2017-03-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.