Literature DB >> 22748787

National trends in percutaneous cholecystostomy between 1994 and 2009: perspectives from Medicare provider claims.

Richard Duszak1, Stephen W Behrman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess national trends and regional variation in the utilization of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC).
METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service claims files from 1994 to 2009 were used to identify trends in PC compared with laparoscopic and open surgical gallbladder procedures. Volume, geographic variation, provider specialty, and service site were analyzed.
RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2009, annual PC procedures increased by 567% (from 1,085 to 7,239). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy increased by 3% (from 203,836 to 209,650), and open procedures declined by 73% (from 119,086 to 32,222). As a percentage of all gallbladder procedures, PC increased from 0.3% to 2.9% and varied considerably among Medicare regions, ranging from 1.4% (Denver) to 5.2% (Boston). Radiologists perform most PC procedures (97%), and most are performed on hospital inpatients (92%).
CONCLUSIONS: Annual PC procedures on Medicare beneficiaries increased almost 6-fold in recent years, as laparoscopic cholecystectomy remained stable, and open procedures declined. The relative utilization of PC varies considerably by region across the United States.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22748787     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy: prognostic factors and comparison to cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Elisha M Collins; Camille G Dessaigne; Amber N Himmler; Alicia M Mohr; Ryan M Thomas; Charles E Hobson; George A Sarosi; William J Zingarelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Portosystemic Shunts: Stable Utilization and Improved Outcomes, Two Decades After the Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt.

Authors:  Brandon C Perry; Sharon W Kwan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Cholecystectomy Vs. Cholecystostomy for the Management of Acute Cholecystitis in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Charles Gaber; Paula D Strassle; Marco G Patti; Anthony G Charles
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Outcomes in the Utilization of Single Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in a Low-Income Population.

Authors:  Ping Lu; Nan-Ping Yang; Nien-Tzu Chang; K Robert Lai; Kai-Biao Lin; Chien-Lung Chan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Converting percutaneous gallbladder drainage to internal drainage using EUS-guided therapy: A review of current practices and procedures.

Authors:  Theodore W James; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

6.  Patterns of care after cholecystostomy tube placement.

Authors:  Alex Lois; Erin Fennern; Sara Cook; David Flum; Giana Davidson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.453

7.  Outcome comparison between percutaneous cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy: a 10-year population-based analysis.

Authors:  Ping Lu; Chien-Lung Chan; Nan-Ping Yang; Nien-Tzu Chang; Kai-Biao Lin; K Robert Lai
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.