Literature DB >> 26409121

Liposomal doxorubicin extravasation controlled by phenotype-specific transport properties of tumor microenvironment and vascular barrier.

Kenji Yokoi1, Diana Chan1, Milos Kojic2, Miljan Milosevic3, David Engler1, Rise Matsunami1, Tomonori Tanei1, Yuki Saito1, Mauro Ferrari1, Arturas Ziemys4.   

Abstract

Although nanotherapeutics can be advantageous over free chemotherapy, the benefits of drug vectors can vary from patient to patient based on differences in tumor microenvironments. Although systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs is considered as the major determinant of its efficacy in clinics, recent clinical and basic research indicates that tumor-based PK can provide better representation of therapeutic efficacy. Here, we have studied the role of the tumor extravascular tissue in the extravasation kinetics of doxorubicin (DOX), delivered by pegylated liposomes (PLD), to murine lung (3LL) and breast (4T1) tumors. We found that phenotypically different 3LL and 4T1 tumors shared the similar systemic PK, but DOX extravasation in the tumor extravascular tissue was substantially different. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) measurements showed that DOX fluorescence imaged by fluorescence microscopy could be used as a marker to study tumor microenvironment PK, providing an excellent match to DOX kinetics in tumor tissues. Our results also suggest that therapeutic responses can be closely related to the interplay of concentration levels and exposure times in extravascular tissue of tumors. Finally, the computational model of capillary drug transport showed that internalization of drug vectors was critical and could lead to 2-3 orders of magnitude more efficient drug delivery into the extravascular tissue, compared to non-internalized localization of drug vectors, and explaining the differences in therapeutic efficacy between the 3LL and 4T1 tumors. These results show that drug transport and partitioning characteristics can be phenotype- and microenvironment-dependent and are highly important in drug delivery and therapeutic efficacy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational diffusion model; Doxorubicin; Drug vector; Kinetics; Liposome; Nanotherapeutics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26409121      PMCID: PMC4623952          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  33 in total

1.  MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps: issues regarding histological validation and assessment of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  A P Pathak; K M Schmainda; B D Ward; J R Linderman; K J Rebro; A S Greene
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: a review of its use in metastatic breast cancer, ovarian cancer, multiple myeloma and AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.

Authors:  Sean T Duggan; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Tumor-based pharmacokinetics has greater significance for anticancer drugs than does blood-based pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Walter Wolf; Cary A Presant
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Nanogeometry: beyond drug delivery.

Authors:  Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 5.  Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs.

Authors:  Andrew Z Wang; Robert Langer; Omid C Farokhzad
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Relations between the penetration, binding and average concentration of cytostatic drugs in human tumour spheroids.

Authors:  M Erlanson; E Daniel-Szolgay; J Carlsson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Deciphering the fluorescence signature of daunomycin and doxorubicin.

Authors:  K K Karukstis; E H Thompson; J A Whiles; R J Rosenfeld
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1998-07-27       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 8.  Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Dan Peer; Jeffrey M Karp; Seungpyo Hong; Omid C Farokhzad; Rimona Margalit; Robert Langer
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 9.  Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer.

Authors:  Mark E Davis; Zhuo Georgia Chen; Dong M Shin
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  Tumour uptake of doxorubicin in polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes and therapeutic effect against a xenografted human pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  J Vaage; D Donovan; P Uster; P Working
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  In vitro microfluidic models of tumor microenvironment to screen transport of drugs and nanoparticles.

Authors:  Altug Ozcelikkale; Hye-Ran Moon; Michael Linnes; Bumsoo Han
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-02-14

Review 2.  Imaging of Nanoparticle Distribution to Assess Treatments That Alter Delivery.

Authors:  Stephanie J Blocker; Anthony F Shields
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Acoustically Driven Microbubbles Enable Targeted Delivery of microRNA-Loaded Nanoparticles to Spontaneous Hepatocellular Neoplasia in Canines.

Authors:  Sukumar Uday Kumar; Arsenii V Telichko; Huaijun Wang; Dongwoon Hyun; Eric G Johnson; Michael S Kent; Robert B Rebhun; Jeremy J Dahl; William T N Culp; Ramasamy Paulmurugan
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2020-11-12

Review 4.  Enhancing cancer immunotherapy through nanotechnology-mediated tumor infiltration and activation of immune cells.

Authors:  Haifa Shen; Tong Sun; Hanh H Hoang; Jana S Burchfield; Gillian F Hamilton; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 11.130

5.  Albumin Binds Doxorubicin via Self-Assembling Dyes as Specific Polymolecular Ligands.

Authors:  Anna Jagusiak; Katarzyna Chłopaś; Grzegorz Zemanek; Izabela Kościk; Paweł Skorek; Barbara Stopa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Progression-dependent transport heterogeneity of breast cancer liver metastases as a factor in therapeutic resistance.

Authors:  A Ziemys; K Yokoi; M Kai; Y T Liu; M Kojic; V Simic; M Milosevic; A Holder; M Ferrari
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 7.  The new era of nanotechnology, an alternative to change cancer treatment.

Authors:  Ancuta Jurj; Cornelia Braicu; Laura-Ancuta Pop; Ciprian Tomuleasa; Claudia Diana Gherman; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Species difference in paclitaxel disposition correlated with poor pharmacological efficacy translation from mice to humans.

Authors:  Ying Fei Li; Chengyue Zhang; Simon Zhou; Miao He; Huixia Zhang; Nianhang Chen; Feng Li; Xin Luan; Manjunath Pai; Hebao Yuan; Duxin Sun; Yan Li
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-08

9.  Seed- and Soil-Dependent Differences in Murine Breast Tumor Microenvironments Dictate Anti-PD-L1 IgG Delivery and Therapeutic Efficacy.

Authors:  Yan Ting Liu; Shreya Goel; Megumi Kai; Jose Alberto Moran Guerrero; Thao Nguyen; Junhua Mai; Haifa Shen; Arturas Ziemys; Kenji Yokoi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 10.  Revisiting the outstanding questions in cancer nanomedicine with a future outlook.

Authors:  M S Sudheesh; K Pavithran; Sabitha M
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-12-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.