Literature DB >> 28198106

In vitro microfluidic models of tumor microenvironment to screen transport of drugs and nanoparticles.

Altug Ozcelikkale1, Hye-Ran Moon1, Michael Linnes1, Bumsoo Han1.   

Abstract

Advances in nanotechnology have enabled numerous types of nanoparticles (NPs) to improve drug delivery to tumors. While many NP systems have been proposed, their clinical translation has been less than anticipated primarily due to failure of current preclinical evaluation techniques to adequately model the complex interactions between the NP and physiological barriers of tumor microenvironment. This review focuses on microfluidic tumor models for characterization of delivery efficacy and toxicity of cancer nanomedicine. Microfluidics offer significant advantages over traditional macroscale cell cultures by enabling recapitulation of tumor microenvironment through precise control of physiological cues such as hydrostatic pressure, shear stress, oxygen, and nutrient gradients. Microfluidic systems have recently started to be adapted for screening of drugs and NPs under physiologically relevant settings. So far the two primary application areas of microfluidics in this area have been high-throughput screening using traditional culture settings such as single cells or multicellular tumor spheroids, and mimicry of tumor microenvironment for study of cancer-related cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. These microfluidic technologies are also useful in modeling specific steps in NP delivery to tumor and characterize NP transport properties and outcomes by systematic variation of physiological conditions. Ultimately, it will be possible to design drug-screening platforms uniquely tailored for individual patient physiology using microfluidics. These in vitro models can contribute to development of precision medicine by enabling rapid and patient-specific evaluation of cancer nanomedicine. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2017, 9:e1460. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1460 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28198106      PMCID: PMC5555839          DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol        ISSN: 1939-0041


  162 in total

Review 1.  Intravascular delivery of particulate systems: does geometry really matter?

Authors:  Paolo Decuzzi; Renata Pasqualini; Wadih Arap; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  The effects of particle size and molecular targeting on the intratumoral and subcellular distribution of polymeric nanoparticles.

Authors:  Helen Lee; Humphrey Fonge; Bryan Hoang; Raymond M Reilly; Christine Allen
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Tumors as organs: complex tissues that interface with the entire organism.

Authors:  Mikala Egeblad; Elizabeth S Nakasone; Zena Werb
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 4.  Interstitial fluid and lymph formation and transport: physiological regulation and roles in inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Helge Wiig; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Plasmonic nanobubble-enhanced endosomal escape processes for selective and guided intracellular delivery of chemotherapy to drug-resistant cancer cells.

Authors:  Ekaterina Y Lukianova-Hleb; Andrey Belyanin; Shruti Kashinath; Xiangwei Wu; Dmitri O Lapotko
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Isolation of interstitial fluid from rat mammary tumors by a centrifugation method.

Authors:  Helge Wiig; Knut Aukland; Olav Tenstad
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 7.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review.

Authors:  H Maeda; J Wu; T Sawa; Y Matsumura; K Hori
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Silica nanoparticles as hepatotoxicants.

Authors:  Hikaru Nishimori; Masuo Kondoh; Katsuhiro Isoda; Shin-Ichi Tsunoda; Yasuo Tsutsumi; Kiyohito Yagi
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.571

9.  Microfabrication of polydimethylsiloxane phantoms to simulate tumor hypoxia and vascular anomaly.

Authors:  Qiang Wu; Wenqi Ren; Zelin Yu; Erbao Dong; Shiwu Zhang; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Engineering a Brain Cancer Chip for High-throughput Drug Screening.

Authors:  Yantao Fan; Duong Thanh Nguyen; Yasemin Akay; Feng Xu; Metin Akay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Tumour-on-a-chip: microfluidic models of tumour morphology, growth and microenvironment.

Authors:  Hsieh-Fu Tsai; Alen Trubelja; Amy Q Shen; Gang Bao
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Recent advances of controlled drug delivery using microfluidic platforms.

Authors:  Sharma T Sanjay; Wan Zhou; Maowei Dou; Hamed Tavakoli; Lei Ma; Feng Xu; XiuJun Li
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  Designer Self-Assembling Peptide Hydrogels to Engineer 3D Cell Microenvironments for Cell Constructs Formation and Precise Oncology Remodeling in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Zehong Yang; Hongyan Xu; Xiaojun Zhao
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 16.806

4.  A Biomimetic Tumor Model of Heterogeneous Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michael J Bradney; Stephanie M Venis; Yi Yang; Stephen F Konieczny; Bumsoo Han
Journal:  Small       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 13.281

5.  Differential response to doxorubicin in breast cancer subtypes simulated by a microfluidic tumor model.

Authors:  Altug Ozcelikkale; Kyeonggon Shin; Victoria Noe-Kim; Bennett D Elzey; Zizheng Dong; Jian-Ting Zhang; Kwangmeyung Kim; Ick Chan Kwon; Kinam Park; Bumsoo Han
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  Engineering in vitro immune-competent tissue models for testing and evaluation of therapeutics.

Authors:  Jennifer H Hammel; Jonathan M Zatorski; Sophie R Cook; Rebecca R Pompano; Jennifer M Munson
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 7.  Tackling tumor heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity in cancer precision medicine: our experience and a literature review.

Authors:  Shijie Sheng; M Margarida Bernardo; Sijana H Dzinic; Kang Chen; Elisabeth I Heath; Wael A Sakr
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Analysis of adhesion kinetics of cancer cells on inflamed endothelium using a microfluidic platform.

Authors:  Taylor J Thompson; Bumsoo Han
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Active Antioxidizing Particles for On-Demand Pressure-Driven Molecular Release.

Authors:  Yongbeom Seo; Jiayu Leong; Jye Yng Teo; Jennifer W Mitchell; Martha U Gillette; Bumsoo Han; Jonghwi Lee; Hyunjoon Kong
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 9.229

10.  In vitro vascularized tumor platform for modeling tumor-vasculature interactions of inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Manasa Gadde; Caleb Phillips; Neda Ghousifam; Anna G Sorace; Enoch Wong; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Anum Syed; Omar Rahal; Thomas E Yankeelov; Wendy A Woodward; Marissa N Rylander
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.