Literature DB >> 26405667

Qualitative Assessment of Speech Perception Performance of Early and Late Cochlear Implantees.

Anjali R Kant1, Sonal Pathak2.   

Abstract

The present study aims to provide a qualitative description and comparison of speech perception performance using model based tests like multisyllabic lexical neighborhood test (MLNT) and lexical neighborhood test (LNT), in early and late implanted (prelingual) hearing impaired children using cochlear implants. The subjects comprised of cochlear implantees; Group I (early implantees)-n = 15, 3-6 years of age; mean age at implantation-3½ years. Group II (late implantees)-n = 15, 7-13 years of age; mean age at implantation-5 years. The tests were presented in a sound treated room at 70 dBSPL. The children were instructed to repeat the words on hearing them. Responses were scored as percentage of words correctly repeated. Their means were computed. The late implantees achieved higher scores for words on MLNT than those on LNT. This may imply that late implantees are making use of length cues in order to aid them in speech perception. The major phonological process used by early implantees was deletion and by the late implantees was substitution. One needs to wait until the child achieves a score of 20 % on LNT before assessing other aspects of his/her speech perception abilities. There appears to be a need to use speech perception tests which are based on theoretical empirical models, in order to enable us to give a descriptive analysis of post implant speech perception performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early implantees; LNT; Late implantees; MLNT; Speech perception

Year:  2015        PMID: 26405667      PMCID: PMC4575664          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-015-0881-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  8 in total

1.  Speech perception by prelingually deaf children after six years of Cochlear implant use: effects of age at implantation.

Authors:  R S Tyler; H F Teagle; D M Kelsay; B J Gantz; G G Woodworth; A J Parkinson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2000-12

2.  Effect of age at cochlear implantation on open-set word recognition in Mandarin speaking deaf children.

Authors:  Jiunn-Liang Wu; Cheng-Yu Lin; Hui-Mei Yang; Yi-Hui Lin
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 1.675

3.  Lexical effects on spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K I Kirk; D B Pisoni; M J Osberger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Audiologic evaluation of deaf children.

Authors:  N P Erber; C M Alencewicz
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1976-05

5.  A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition.

Authors:  P A Luce
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-03

6.  Audiological results in children with a cochlear implant.

Authors:  M A Thielemeir; L L Tonokawa; B Petersen; L S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4-year time period.

Authors:  Seung-Ha Oh; Chong-Sun Kim; Eun Joo Kang; Dong Soo Lee; Hyo Jeong Lee; Sun O Chang; Soon-Hyun Ahn; Chan Ho Hwang; Hong Ju Park; Ja Won Koo
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Use of Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT) in the Assessment of Speech Recognition Performance of Cochlear Implantees with Normal and Malformed Cochlea.

Authors:  Anjali R Kant; Arun A Banik
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-02

2.  Preoperative evaluation of cochlear implantation through the round window membrane in the facial recess using high-resolution computed tomography.

Authors:  Li-Hong Xie; Jie Tang; Wen-Jie Miao; Xiang-Long Tang; Heng Li; An-Zhou Tang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 1.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.