Literature DB >> 29340754

Preoperative evaluation of cochlear implantation through the round window membrane in the facial recess using high-resolution computed tomography.

Li-Hong Xie1, Jie Tang1, Wen-Jie Miao1, Xiang-Long Tang1, Heng Li1, An-Zhou Tang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the risk of cochlear implantation through the round window membrane in the facial recess through a preoperative analysis of the angle between the facial nerve-round window and the cranial midline using high-resolution temporal bone CT.
METHODS: Temporal bone CT films of 176 patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss at our hospital from 2013 to 2015 were reviewed. The preoperative temporal bone CT scans of the patients were retrospectively analysed. The vertical distance (d value) from the leading edge of the facial nerve to the posterior wall of the external auditory canal and the angle (α value) between the line from the leading edge of the facial nerve to the midpoint of the round window membrane and the median sagittal line on the round window membrane plane were measured. Based on intraoperative observation, the round window membrane was divided into complete round window membrane exposure (group A), partial exposure (group B), and unexposed (group C) groups, and statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The α value could be effectively measured for all 176 patients (62.60 ± 7.12), and the d value could be effectively measured for 95 cases (5.53 ± 1.00). An analysis of the correlation between the α and d values of these 95 cases found a negative correlation. Of the 176 cases, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the differences among the groups were significant [P = 0.000 (< 0.05)].
CONCLUSION: The angle (α value) between the line connecting the leading edge of the facial nerve to the midpoint of the round window and the median sagittal line measured in preoperative CT scans was associated with the difficulty of intraoperatively exposing the round window membrane. When the α value was larger than a certain degree, the difficulty of exposing the round window membrane was increased. In such cases, the surgeon should fully expose the round window membrane during surgery, which could result decrease the likelihood of complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implantation; Facial nerve; Round window membrane; Temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29340754     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-018-1972-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  14 in total

1.  Flat-panel volume computed tomography for cochlear implant electrode array examination in isolated temporal bone specimens.

Authors:  Soenke H Bartling; Rajiv Gupta; Attila Torkos; Christian Dullin; Grabbe Eckhardt; Thomas Lenarz; Hartmut Becker; Timo Stöver
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Future technology in cochlear implants: assessing the benefit.

Authors:  Robert J S Briggs
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-05

3.  Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion.

Authors:  Annabelle C Leong; Dan Jiang; Andreas Agger; Alec Fitzgerald-O'Connor
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Cochlear implantation-evaluation of round window membrane accessibility].

Authors:  Omid Majdani; Heidi Olze
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.057

5.  Round window chamber and fustis: endoscopic anatomy and surgical implications.

Authors:  Daniele Marchioni; Davide Soloperto; Elena Colleselli; Maria Fatima Tatti; Nirmal Patel; Nicholas Jufas
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Cochlear implantation in a subject with a narrow facial recess: Importance of preoperative radiological findings.

Authors:  Tahir Emal
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-05

7.  Analysis of intersubject variations in intracochlear and middle ear surface anatomy for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Stanley Pelosi; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Qualitative Assessment of Speech Perception Performance of Early and Late Cochlear Implantees.

Authors:  Anjali R Kant; Sonal Pathak
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-07-11

9.  Multislice spiral computed tomography imaging in congenital inner ear malformations.

Authors:  Hui Ma; Ping Han; Bo Liang; Zhi-liang Tian; Zi-qiao Lei; Wei-jia Kong; Gan-sheng Feng
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Retroposed elements as archives for the evolutionary history of placental mammals.

Authors:  Jan Ole Kriegs; Gennady Churakov; Martin Kiefmann; Ursula Jordan; Jürgen Brosius; Jürgen Schmitz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

1.  New hybrid multiplanar cone beam computed tomography-laser-fluoroscopic-guided approach in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Stephan Waldeck; Sandra Schmidt; Christian von Falck; René Chapot; Marc Brockmann; Daniel Overhoff
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Radiological and surgical aspects of round window visibility during cochlear implantation: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Saad Jwair; Job J M van Eijden; Esther E Blijleven; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Hans G X M Thomeer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.