Literature DB >> 26405263

A prospective, randomized, pharmacodynamic study of quick-starting a desogestrel progestin-only pill following ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception.

V Brache1, L Cochon2, I J M Duijkers3, D P Levy4, N Kapp4, C Monteil4, J L Abitbol4, C Klipping3.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a pharmacodynamic interaction between ulipristal acetate (UPA) 30 mg for emergency contraception and a daily progestin-only contraceptive pill, desogestrel (DSG) 0.75 mg, when initiated the next day? SUMMARY ANSWER: In this study, DSG impaired the ability of UPA to delay ovulation, but UPA had little impact on the onset of contraceptive effects due to DSG. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: UPA is a progesterone receptor modulator used for emergency contraceptive (EC) at the dose of 30 mg. UPA delays ovulation by at least 5 days when administered in the mid to late follicular phase. In theory, potent progestins could reactivate progesterone signaling that leads to follicle rupture, thereby impacting the effectiveness of UPA as EC. In addition, UPA could alter the onset of the contraceptive effect of progestin-containing contraceptives started immediately after UPA. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A single-blind (for observer), placebo-controlled, partial crossover study was conducted in two sites [Dominican Republic (DR) and the Netherlands (NDL)] over 11 months from October 2012 to September 2013. Healthy female volunteers participated in two of the three treatment cycles separated by a washout cycle. Treatment combinations studied were as follows: (i) a single 30 mg dose of UPA followed by 75 µg per day DSG for 20 days, (ii) a single 30 mg dose of UPA followed by 20 days of placebo matching that of DSG (PLB2) or (iii) one tablet of placebo-matching UPA (PLB1) followed by 75 µg per day DSG for 20 days. Participants were randomized to one of the three treatment sequences (UPA + DSG/UPA + PLB2, PLB1 + DSG/UPA + DSG and UPA + PLB2/PLB1 + DSG) when a lead follicle was ≥ 14 to <16 mm diameter on transvaginal ultrasound imaging (TVU). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIAL, SETTING,
METHODS: A total of 71 women were included, and 49 were randomized to a first treatment combination of the three period sequences (20 in the DR and 29 in the NDL); 41 of the 49 continued and completed two treatment combinations (20 in the DR and 21 in the NDL). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Initiating DSG treatment the day after UPA significantly reduced the ovulation delaying effect of UPA (P = 0.0054). While ovulation occurred in only one of the 29 UPA-only cycles (3%) in the first 5 days, it occurred in 13 of the 29 (45%) UPA + DSG cycles. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was a small, descriptive, pharmacodynamic study in which some findings differed by study site. Distinguishing between a cystic corpus luteum and a luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) by TVU was difficult in some cases; however, the investigators reached consensus, when the study was still blinded, regarding ovulation based on hormone levels and careful review of daily TVU images. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Initiating the use of a DSG progestin-only pill (POP) immediately after UPA reduces the ability of UPA to delay ovulation and thus may decrease its efficacy as EC. If starting a DSG POP after using UPA for EC, and possibly any progestin-only method, consideration should be given to delaying for at least 5 days after UPA intake in order to preserve the ovulation delaying effects of UPA.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UPA; emergency contraception; progesterone receptor modulator; progestin-only pills; quickstart

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26405263     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Combined oral contraceptive interference with the ability of ulipristal acetate to delay ovulation: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alison B Edelman; Jeffrey T Jensen; Sara McCrimmon; Marci Messerle-Forbes; Andrea O'Donnell; Jon D Hennebold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Provision of the progestogen-only pill by community pharmacies as bridging contraception for women receiving emergency contraception: the Bridge-it RCT.

Authors:  Sharon T Cameron; Anna Glasier; Lisa McDaid; Andrew Radley; Susan Patterson; Paula Baraitser; Judith Stephenson; Richard Gilson; Claire Battison; Kathleen Cowle; Thenmalar Vadiveloo; Anne Johnstone; Alessandra Morelli; Beatriz Goulao; Mark Forrest; Alison McDonald; John Norrie
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception.

Authors:  David K Turok; Alexandra Gero; Rebecca G Simmons; Jennifer E Kaiser; Gregory J Stoddard; Corinne D Sexsmith; Lori M Gawron; Jessica N Sanders
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Video counseling about emergency contraception: an observational study.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanders; Linh A Moran; Madeline Mullholand; Erica Torres; David K Turok
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Double Dosing Levonorgestrel-Based Emergency Contraception for Individuals With Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alison B Edelman; Jon D Hennebold; Kise Bond; Jeong Y Lim; Ganesh Cherala; David F Archer; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 6.  Clinical Pharmacology of Hormonal Emergency Contraceptive Pills.

Authors:  Celia M J Matyanga; Blessing Dzingirai
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2018-10-04

7.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception and beyond: a systematic review update.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Tik Shan Cheung
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-21

Review 8.  Mechanism of Action of Ulipristal Acetate for Emergency Contraception: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elena Rosato; Manuela Farris; Carlo Bastianelli
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 9.  State of emergency contraception in the U.S., 2018.

Authors:  Kristin O Haeger; Jacqueline Lamme; Kelly Cleland
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2018-09-05

10.  Contraception for Adolescents

Authors:  Nicole Todd; Amanda Black
Journal:  J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2020-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.