| Literature DB >> 26404455 |
Roger A Vaughan1,2, Richard L Garrison1, Alexis D Stamatikos1, Minsung Kang1, Jamie A Cooper3, Chad M Paton4,5.
Abstract
Recently, the pro-inflammatory effects of linoleic acid (LNA) have been re-examined. It is now becoming clear that relatively few studies have adequately assessed the effects of LNA, independent of obesity. The purpose of this work was to compare the effects of several fat-enriched but non-obesigenic diets on inflammation to provide a more accurate assessment of LNA's ability to induce inflammation. Specifically, 8-week-old male C57Bl/6 mice were fed either saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), LNA, or alpha-linolenic acid enriched diets (50 % Kcal from fat, 22 % wt/wt) for 4 weeks. Chow and high-fat, hyper-caloric diets were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. Expression of pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant markers from epididymal fat, liver, and plasma were measured along with food intake and body weights. Mice fed the high SFA, MUFA, and high-fat diets exhibited increased pro-inflammatory markers in liver and adipose tissue; however, mice fed LNA for four weeks did not display significant changes in pro-inflammatory or pro-coagulant markers in epididymal fat, liver, or plasma. The present study demonstrates that LNA alone is insufficient to induce inflammation. Instead, it is more likely that hyper-caloric diets are responsible for diet-induced inflammation possibly due to adipose tissue remodeling.Entities:
Keywords: Cytokines; Fatty acid composition; Inflammation; Linoleic acid; Obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26404455 DOI: 10.1007/s11745-015-4072-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids ISSN: 0024-4201 Impact factor: 1.880