Literature DB >> 26404417

Risk of developing advanced colorectal neoplasia after removing high-risk adenoma detected at index colonoscopy in young patients: A KASID study.

Soo-Kyung Park1, Nam Hee Kim1, Yoon Suk Jung1, Won Hee Kim2, Chang Soo Eun3, Bong Min Ko4, Geom Seog Seo5, Jae Myung Cha6, Jae Jun Park7, Kyeong Ok Kim8, Chang Mo Moon9, Yoonho Jung10, Eun Soo Kim11, Seong Ran Jeon12, Chang Kyun Lee13, Dong Il Park1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Advanced adenoma (> 10 mm in diameter, villous structure, or high-grade dysplasia) in young patients may have different characteristics and prognosis compared with those in older patients. We aimed to compare the incidence of colorectal neoplasms in young patients with older patients after removing high-risk adenoma (advance adenoma or ≥ 3 adenomas).
METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted at 13 university hospitals in Korea. The 1479 patients who removed high-risk adenoma at index colonoscopy and followed by surveillance colonoscopy ≥ 2.5 years after were included. The cumulative incidence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasms was compared according to the age groups (group 1: < 50 years, group 2: 50-70 years, and group 3: ≥ 70 years).
RESULTS: The prevalence of advance adenoma detected at index colonoscopy was significantly higher in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (85.4%, 78.1%, and 77.2%, respectively; P = 0.035). The 5 years cumulative incidence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasms were 61.9%, 67.9%, and 74.7% (P < 0.001), and 11.7%, 17.9%, and 27.1% (P = 0.001) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age > 70 years was a significant risk factor for developing overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.82, P = 0.004) and advanced colorectal neoplasms (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.43-4.59, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: The cumulative incidence of overall and advanced colorectal neoplasms was significantly higher in older patients than in young patient groups. Age was a significant risk factor for developing colorectal neoplasms after removing high-risk adenoma.
© 2015 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; colorectal neoplasms; young adult

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26404417     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  10 in total

Review 1.  A Review of the Management of Sporadic Colorectal Adenomas in Young People: Is Surveillance Wasted on the Young?

Authors:  Daniel Bushyhead; Otto S T Lin; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Yield of Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults with a History of Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gregory J Williams; Sage T Hellerstedt; Paige N Scudder; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.487

3.  Portal Hypertension Complications Are Frequently the First Presentation of NAFLD in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation Evaluation.

Authors:  Sajan Jiv Singh Nagpal; Mohammad Nasser Kabbany; Bashar Mohamad; Rocio Lopez; Nizar N Zein; Naim Alkhouri
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Young adults and metachronous neoplasia: risks for future advanced adenomas and large serrated polyps compared with older adults.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Christina M Robinson; Lynn F Butterly
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Systematic Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Risk for Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Adenoma.

Authors:  Ngozi Enwerem; Moo Y Cho; Joshua Demb; Ashley Earles; Karen M Heskett; Lin Liu; Siddharth Singh; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

7.  Advanced Colonic Neoplasia at Follow-up Colonoscopy According to Risk Components and Adenoma Location at Index Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Study of 1,974 Asymptomatic Koreans.

Authors:  Su Jung Baik; Hyojin Park; Jae Jun Park; Hyun Ju Lee; So Young Jo; Yoo Mi Park; Hye Sun Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.519

8.  Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years.

Authors:  Yoon Suk Jung; Nam Hee Kim; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Chong Il Sohn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Efficacy of mosapride citrate with a split dose of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparation in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jin Lee; Su Jin Jeong; Tae Hyung Kim; Yong Eun Park; Joon Hyuk Choi; Nae-Yun Heo; Jongha Park; Seung Ha Park; Young Soo Moon; Tae Oh Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  RNA-sequencing identification and validation of genes differentially expressed in high-risk adenoma, advanced colorectal cancer, and normal controls.

Authors:  Namjoo Kim; Jeong-An Gim; Beom Jae Lee; Byung Il Choi; Seung Bin Park; Hee Sook Yoon; Sang Hee Kang; Seung Han Kim; Moon Kyung Joo; Jong-Jae Park; Chungyeul Kim; Han-Kyeom Kim
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.410

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.