| Literature DB >> 26404215 |
Joyce C Mello1, Mariano V D Gonzalez2, Vivian W R Moraes3, Tatiana Prieto4, Otaciro R Nascimento5, Tiago Rodrigues6.
Abstract
Plantago major L. produces several chemical substances with anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities and its use in the treatment of oral and throat inflammation in popular medicine is well described. In this study, the antioxidant potential of the Plantago major hydroethanolic extract was screened and its protective action was evaluated against t-BOOH-induced oxidative stress. The extract was obtained by fractionated percolation using 50% ethanolic solution and, after drying, suspended in dimethyl sulfoxide. The chromatographic profile of crude extract was obtained with the identification of some phytochemical markers and the total phenols and flavonoids were quantified. The scavenger activity against DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radicals was determined and the antioxidant activity in biological systems was evaluated in isolated rat liver mitochondria and HepG2 cells. The extract exhibited a significant free radical scavenger activity at 0.1 mg/mL, and decreased the ROS (reactive oxygen species) generation in succinate-energized mitochondria. Such an effect was associated with the preservation of the intrinsic antioxidant defenses (reduced glutathione and NAD(P)H) against the oxidation by t-BOOH, and also to the protection of membranes from lipid oxidation. The cytoprotective effect of PmHE against t-BOOH induced cell death was also shown. These findings contribute to the understanding of the health benefits attributed to P. major.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; folk medicine; free radicals; oxidative stress; plantain
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26404215 PMCID: PMC6332108 DOI: 10.3390/molecules201017747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1HPLC separation profile of P. major hydroethanolic extract. Representative chromatogram of the isolated compounds/fractions with detection at 245 nm. Peaks indicate the retention times of some flavonoids, which were identified by comparison with flavonoid standards.
Figure 21,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) reduction by P. major hydroethanolic extract (PmHE). DPPH solution was incubated with different concentrations of P. major extracts and absorbance was measured at 517 nm (closed squares). Quercetin (0.1 mg/mL) was used as standard (closed circle). The results were expressed as percentage in relation to DPPH solution, considered as 100%. Inset: Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of DPPH radical obtained in the absence of the extract (control) or in the presence of 0.1 mg/mL PmHE.
Figure 3Protective effects of P. major hydroethanolic extract in isolated rat liver mitochondria exposed to the oxidant t-BOOH. Mitochondria (1 mg/mL) were incubated with PmHE (0.1 mg/mL) in the presence of 0.6 mM t-BOOH. (A) ROS (reactive oxygen species) generation was accompanied by monitoring DCF (2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein) fluorescence at 503/529 nm excitation/emission, respectively; traces are representative of (at least) three experiments with different mitochondrial preparations; (B) GSH (glutathione, reduced form) and (C) NAD(P)H levels measured fluorimetrically, as described in Materials and Methods. Data were presented as the mean of three experiments with different mitochondrial preparations; (D) Lipid peroxidation was as TBARS. Percentages were calculated by considering positive control as 100% and data were presented as mean ± S.E.M. of three experiments in triplicate with different mitochondrial preparations. * Statistically different from t-BOOH, and statistically different from control (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Cytoprotective effect of P. major hydroethanolic extract against t-BOOH-induced cell death. HepG2 cells (1.6 × 105 cells/cm2) were incubated for 24 h in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere with 0.25 or 0.5 mM t-BOOH in the presence (gray bars) and absence (black bars) of 0.1 mg/mL PmHE. Both, t-BOOH and PmHE were added at the same time. */** Statistically different from 0.25 and 0.5 mM t-BOOH, respectively (p < 0.05).