Zhong Wei Poh1,2, Chin Heng Gan1, Eric J Lee1, Suxian Guo3, George W Yip3, Yulin Lam1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore. 2. NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering (NGS), Singapore. 3. Department of Anatomy, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore.
Abstract
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) regulate many important physiological processes. A pertinent issue to address is whether GAGs encode important functional information via introduction of position specific sulfate groups in the GAG structure. However, procurement of pure, homogenous GAG motifs to probe the "sulfation code" is a challenging task due to isolation difficulty and structural complexity. To this end, we devised a versatile synthetic strategy to obtain all the 16 theoretically possible sulfation patterns in the chondroitin sulfate (CS) repeating unit; these include rare but potentially important sulfated motifs which have not been isolated earlier. Biological evaluation indicated that CS sulfation patterns had differing effects for different breast cancer cell types, and the greatest inhibitory effect was observed for the most aggressive, triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231.
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) regulate many important physiological processes. A pertinent issue to address is whether GAGs encode important functional information via introduction of position specific sulfate groups in the GAG structure. However, procurement of pure, homogenous GAG motifs to probe the "sulfation code" is a challenging task due to isolation difficulty and structural complexity. To this end, we devised a versatile synthetic strategy to obtain all the 16 theoretically possible sulfation patterns in the chondroitin sulfate (CS) repeating unit; these include rare but potentially important sulfated motifs which have not been isolated earlier. Biological evaluation indicated that CS sulfation patterns had differing effects for different breast cancer cell types, and the greatest inhibitory effect was observed for the most aggressive, triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231.
Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are heterogeneous polysaccharides comprising of repeating uronic acid and amino sugar disaccharide units. These macromolecules can be covalently attached to core proteins to form proteoglycan side chains, or located in the extracellular matrix and intracellular secretory granules123. GAGs have gained interest as potential therapeutic agents in cancer treatment, with studies showing their involvement in various pathobiological cancer stages45, and interactions with various effective molecules such as growth factors and cytokines67. Overexpression of chondroitin sulfate (CS) has been identified in various cancer phenotypes such as prostate, testicular, gastric, pancreatic and breast cancer89101112. For instance, compositional analysis of GAG side chains isolated from malignant breast tissues indicate an elevation in CS expression131415, with an increase in CS-A and CS-E sulfation sequences and a decrease in CS-C and CS-D161718. These indicate that the sulfate groups present on CS might play an important role in the cellular processes involved in the progression of breast cancer781920.To investigate the molecular interactions of CS, chemical synthesis provides a viable alternative to prepare pure, homogenous CS sequences via careful control on the site(s) of sulfation to probe structural activity relationship. Notable work has been achieved by various groups in the synthesis of different CS analogues, such as CS-A, CS-C, CS-D, CS-E, CS-R, CS-K, CS-L, CS-M2122232425262728293031323334 and some of these analogues have been studied for their biological effects243536. However, based on the current synthetic strategies reported, not all the sulfation patterns possible in the CS repeating unit can be obtained. We opined that CS sulfation motifs which are not commonly expressed could encode important regulatory information. Thus, we envisioned a synthetic strategy which would allow for the synthesis of all the sulfation patterns possible in CS.In CS, sulfation may occur on the C-2, C-3 positions of D-glucuronic acid and the C-4′, C-6′ positions of D-N-acetyl galactosamine (Fig. 1) thus accounting for a total of 16 disaccharide possibilities. As with other saccharide synthesis, many key protection steps are required to control the site of sulfation in the desired analogue373839. Our synthetic strategy utilizes the benzyl ether and ester protecting groups as orthogonal handles to direct regioselective sulfation in the final product. Prior research work has demonstrated that the C-2ester directing group is pivotal to direct β-stereoselective glycosylation2534. Since C-2 may contain a sulfate group, ester protected hydroxyl groups are thus required as both sulfation and non-sulfation sites depending on the target compound. With this in mind, we modified some of the currently available CS precursors243135384041 to obtain glycosyl donors D1–D4 and acceptors A1–A4; these building blocks enable the synthesis of all 16 sulfation patterns theoretically possible in the CS repeating unit.
Figure 1
Glycosyl donors and acceptors for CS disaccharide library synthesis.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of monomeric building blocks
To obtain the glycosyl donors, intermediate 3 (Fig. 2) was subjected to different protection steps in a divergent mode. C-2ester protection was required for all 4 donors to direct β-stereoselective glycosylation, and the C-3hydroxyl group was protected either as an ester or a benzyl ether via the dibutyl tin oxide mediated approach42. For D1 and D2, ester protected hydroxyl groups were denoted as sulfation sites; hence an orthogonal benzyl ether protecting group was required on C-4, achieved by the use of CoCl2 and BH3.THF to direct complete regio-reductive ring opening of the benzylidene acetal protecting group4344 (intermediates 7 and 8). Conversely, D3 and D4 mark benzyl ether protected hydroxyl groups as sulfation sites and hence require the orthogonal ester protection at C-4; chloroacetyl ester was chosen as this group could be selectively cleaved to allow for the synthesis of longer CS fragments when required4546. Intermediates 7, 8, 9, 10 were subjected to C-6 oxidation and carboxylate methylation, followed by C-4 chloroacetylation (for intermediates 15 and 16). This was followed by anomeric thiophenol deprotection and attachment of the trichloroacetimidate glycosyl auxiliary to furnish donors D1–D4.
To obtain the glycosyl acceptors, known intermediate 23474849 was modified to introduce key protecting groups in common intermediate 26 (Fig. 3). Regio-reductive ring opening of the benzylidene acetal in 26 enabled the formation of the benzyl ether on either the C-4′ position or C-6′ position depending on the choice of Lewis acid used. Ring opening using triethylsilane/TfOH system enabled the formation of the benzyl ether on the C-6′ position in complete regioselectivity50 (intermediate 27), ascertained by 2D NMR. Alternatively, the benzyl ether could be obtained on the C-4′ position with complete regioselectivity via triethylsilane/PhBCl2 reductive system50 (intermediate 29). Protection of the corresponding hydroxyl groups as esters formed intermediates 28 and 30. The benzylidene acetal could also be cleaved via acidic hydrolysis, with both hydroxyl groups protected as benzyl ethers or esters (32 and 33). The C-2′ azide in intermediates 28, 30, 32 and 33 were next converted to the N-trichloroacetyl group (TCAHN), this C-2 participating group directed β-stereoselective glycosylation of the methyl ether at the anomeric position in the subsequent step. Finally, cleavage of the C-3′ naphthyl ether via DDQ oxidation furnished glycosyl acceptors A1–A4.
With glycosyl donors D1–D4 and glycosyl acceptors A1–A4 on hand, any sulfation pattern required in the final CS disaccharide can be obtained by the judicious choice of donor and acceptor building blocks. D1–D4 were first glycosylated with A1–A4 using TMSOTf catalyst to form the protected disaccharides (Fig. 4). The C-2 participating ester group present in D1–D4 enabled exclusive formation of the β-product25. Upon glycosylation, the trichloroacetyl group was reduced to the acetyl group by radical mediated tributylstannane reduction. Any C-4 chloroacetyl groups present were also reduced to the form acetyl esters (intermediates 46a–46h).
Figure 4
Synthesis of CS disaccharide analogues 45a–45 h and 49a–49 h.
Reagents and conditions: (a) TMSOTf, 4 Å MS, CH2Cl2, −10 °C, 64–75%; (b) Bu3SnH, ABCN, toluene, 100 °C, 69–80%; (c) LiOH, H2O2, THF/H2O, −5 °C to r.t., then NaOH, MeOH, 0 °C to r.t., 72–79%; (d) SO3.TEA, DMF, 50 °C, 68–77%; (e) H2 gas, Pd/C, CH2Cl2/MeOH/H2O, 85–95%; For detailed product yields refer to Supplementary Information; 45h: additional step (f): BnBr, NaHCO3, DMF, 50 °C, after step (c); 49h: only step (c) was required to convert 46h to 49h.
For intermediates 42a–42h, the ester protecting groups were next liberated via basic hydrolysis and the free hydroxyl groups reacted with the sulfating agent. SO3.TEA was utilised to enable complete sulfation of the C-2hydroxyl group in the glucuronic acid moiety; 5 equiv. sulfating agent was required per –OH to ensure complete sulfation of the desired sites. Fortunately, the C-6 carboxylate group generated from the ester deprotection step did not affect the sulfation step. With the sulfate groups attached at the required positions, global deprotection by hydrogenation of the remaining benzyl ether groups proceeded in the final step to furnish 8 distinct CS disaccharides 45a–45h. Due to the high negative charge in tetrasulfateddisaccharide 45h, an additional step was introduced to protect the C-6 carboxylate group as a benzyl ester, which facilitated product isolation during sulfation.For intermediates 46a–46h, the benzyl ethers were first cleaved via hydrogenation and the free hydroxyl groups were reacted with SO3.TEA. Subsequently, global deprotection of the remaining ester protecting groups via basic hydrolysis51 furnished another 8 CS disaccharides 49a–49h. Through this strategy, all 16 CS disaccharides were synthesized, which include those already reported213052535455, in addition to novel sulfation motifs. By the incorporation of orthogonal protecting groups in the monomeric building blocks, we were able to direct site specific sulfation of the CS disaccharide to obtain all the possible isomers, which were characterised by NMR and high resolution mass spectrometry (ESI) techniques. The complete CS disaccharide library thus enables us to probe the “sulfation code” of CS in biological systems via structural activity relationship studies.
Evaluating the CS disaccharide library on breast cancer cell viability
To achieve this, we proceeded to test the effect of CS sulfation patterns on breast cancer cell viability. The synthesized CS disaccharides were tested on 4 different human breast cell lines. This included the non-tumorigenic breast epithelial cell line MCF-12A, to evaluate compound cytotoxicity, and 3 breast cancer cell lines: MCF-7, T47D and MDA-MB-231. MCF-7 and T47D are low grade breast cancer cells which express the estrogen receptor and hence can be targeted using hormonal therapy56575859. MDA-MB-231 cells are high grade triple negative breast cancer cells (TNBC) which do not express the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor nor the human epidermal growth factor receptor 26061. TNBC tumor subtypes show low response to chemotherapy and are more challenging to treat due to the lack of known therapeutic targets, thus resulting in higher patient mortality626364.The biological effect of each CS disaccharide was investigated by incubating the cells with the CS disaccharide for 72 hours, prior to addition of the MTS reagent to determine number of viable cells after treatment period. 4 different CS disaccharide concentrations were tested (0.1 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL). We first screened the 16 CS disaccharides on MCF-12A cells, and the results indicated that there was no significant change in cell viability (Supplementary Fig. 1). Hence these 16 CS disaccharides were not cytotoxic to normal breast cells.Interestingly, when the 16 CS disaccharides were tested on the more aggressive MDA-MB-231 cell line, a statistically significant decrease in cell viability was observed (via one way ANOVA analysis) for CS disaccharides 49f, 45b and 45d at 100 μg/mL concentration (Fig. 5; Supplementary Fig. 2 and 3). These inhibitory effects suggest that the sulfate groups present on CS could encode important regulatory information for cellular processes involved in breast cancer survival. The results from the preliminary CS disaccharide screening also indicate that both the number and position of the sulfate groups present in the CS disaccharide have an effect on MDA-MB-231 cell viability. The non-sulfated and fully sulfatedCS disaccharides, 49h and 45h, have no effect on cell viability suggesting that the presence of some sulfate groups are required for CS to elicit an inhibitory effect on MDA-MB-231 cells but saturating all the possible sulfation sites would lead to a loss of activity.
Figure 5
Cell viability assay results for MCF-12A, MCF-7, T47D and MDA-MB-231 cells.
% cell viability after 72 hours treatment with 100 μg/mL CS disaccharide (a) 49f, (b) 45b, (c) 45d; Data represents the mean ± SD (n = 6) with reference to non-treatment group (control), analyzed using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Dunnett’s test, ***p < 0.01.
We next proceeded to screen the CS disaccharides on low grade breast cancer cells MCF-7 and T47D. The MTS results showed no change in the number of viable cells after treatment with the CS disaccharides, indicating that all 16 CS disaccharides had no significant effect on MCF-7 cells (Supplementary Fig. 4). The same observation was noted in T47D cells (Supplementary Fig. 5).To further evaluate the active CS disaccharides (49f, 45b and 45d), apoptosis assays were subsequently conducted with the Caspase-Glo 3/7 kit which monitored the amount of caspase-3 and -7 activities present in the MDA-MB-231 cells after treatment with the respective CS disaccharides. Results from the caspase assay showed an increase in luminescence when MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with CS disaccharides 49f, 45b and 45d (Fig. 6), indicating an increase in caspase-3 and -7 activities. This suggests that the CS disaccharides could induce death of breast cancer cells via apoptosis. Interestingly, the largest decrease in cancer cell viability and highest amount of caspase activity were seen in the CS disaccharide 45b–treated group.
Figure 6
Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay results for MDA-MB-231 cells.
Relative caspase 3/7 activity after 72 h treatment with 100 μg/mL CS disaccharide 49f, 45b and 45d. Data represents the mean ± SD (n = 6) with reference to non-treatment group (control), analyzed using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Dunnett’s test, ***p < 0.001.
Conclusion
In summary, a versatile synthetic strategy has been devised for the chemical synthesis of all the sulfation patterns possible in the CS repeating unit. A total of 16 different CS disaccharides have been synthesized; these include analogues currently available as well as novel sulfation motifs. Biological evaluation indicated that CS sulfation patterns had differential effects on different types of breast cancer cells. High grade breast tumor cells (MDA-MB-231) showed significant reduction in cell viability upon treatment with CS disaccharides 49f, 45b and 45d while low grade breast tumor cells (MCF-7, T47D) and normal breast cells (MCF-12A) were unaffected. Apoptosis assay suggests that these CS disaccharides could induce apoptosis. Since longer CS sequences could provide stronger activities than the disaccharides2465, further studies are presently ongoing to synthesize and evaluate CS oligosaccharides with the active sulfation profiles for their effect on MDA-MD-231 cells.
Methods
Chemical synthesis of CS disaccharides
Detailed experimental procedures and compound characterization data can be found in the supplementary information, available in the online version of the paper.
MTS Assay
The breast cells were plated onto a 96-well plate and cultured for 24 h. After 24 h, the cells were treated with the desired CS disaccharide at 4 different concentrations: 0.1 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL. A control group was included where only the drug vehicle was used; 6 replicates were made for each data set (n = 6). Cells were treated with each compound for 72 hours, and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution (MTS reagent) was added to each well. Absorbance readings (λ = 490 nm) were taken after 3 h, and the data analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Dunnett’s test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Apoptosis Assay
MDA-MB-231 cells were plated on a 6-well plate and treated with the selected CS disaccharide at 100 μg/mL concentration for 48 h. A control set was included where only the drug vehicle was used. After 48 h, the cells were collected by trypsinization, and reseeded into a white opaque 96-well plate to facilitate luminescence measurement (n = 6). After 24 h, 100 μL of Caspase-Glo® 3/7 reagent was added to each well, and then allowed to incubate for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Luminescence readings were then measured.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Poh, Z.W. et al. Divergent Synthesis of Chondroitin Sulfate Disaccharides and Identification of Sulfate Motifs that Inhibit Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Sci. Rep.
5, 14355; doi: 10.1038/srep14355 (2015).
Authors: Cristal I Gama; Sarah E Tully; Naoki Sotogaku; Peter M Clark; Manish Rawat; Nagarajan Vaidehi; William A Goddard; Akinori Nishi; Linda C Hsieh-Wilson Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2006-07-30 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Athanasia P Asimakopoulou; Achilleas D Theocharis; George N Tzanakakis; Nikos K Karamanos Journal: In Vivo Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Craig A Cooney; Fariba Jousheghany; Aiwei Yao-Borengasser; Bounleut Phanavanh; Tina Gomes; Ann Marie Kieber-Emmons; Eric R Siegel; Larry J Suva; Soldano Ferrone; Thomas Kieber-Emmons; Behjatolah Monzavi-Karbassi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 6.466
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6