Alma Biscevic1, Maja Bohac2, Mateja Koncarevic3, Marija Anticic4, Iva Dekaris5, Sudi Patel6,7. 1. Specialty Eye Hospital "Svjetlost", Heinzelova 39, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. alma.biscevic@svjetlost.hr. 2. Specialty Eye Hospital "Svjetlost", Heinzelova 39, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. maja.bohac@svjetlost.hr. 3. Specialty Eye Hospital "Svjetlost", Heinzelova 39, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. mateja.koncarevic@svjetlost.hr. 4. Specialty Eye Hospital "Svjetlost", Heinzelova 39, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. marija.anticic@svjetlost.hr. 5. Specialty Eye Hospital "Svjetlost", Heinzelova 39, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. iva.dekaris@svjetlost.hr. 6. Specialty Eye Hospital "Svjetlost", Heinzelova 39, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. spatel9@nhs.net. 7. NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK. spatel9@nhs.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of astigmatic laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures between two different platforms using J0 and J45 vector analysis. METHODS: Patients were divided into four groups, depending on the type of astigmatism and laser platform on which they were treated. Astigmatism was between 2 and 7 diopters (D). One hundred and thirty-five patients with myopic astigmatism (246 eyes) and 102 patients with mixed astigmatism (172 eyes) underwent unremarkable LASIK correction on Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz and Schwind Amaris 750S laser platform. The preoperative and postoperative sphere, negative cylinder [C] and axis (ø) of manifest refractions were subjected to vector analysis by calculations of the standard J0 (cos [4π(ø-90)/360]xC/2) and J45 (sin[4π(ø-90)/360]xC/2). RESULTS: Reporting the key results, we found J0 significantly reduced after LASIK in both groups (p < 0.001) but not J45. There was no significant association between individual pairs of pre and postoperative J0 & J45 values. There was no significant difference between the outcomes of the two platforms. CONCLUSIONS: Wavelight Allegretto 400Hz and Schwind Amaris 750S showed excellent results for treating patients with astigmatism, regardless whether it is mixed or myopic astigmatism. The J45 did not reduce significantly possibly because of the low number of eyes with oblique astigmatism. There was no genuine difference post-operatively between groups treated on two different laser platforms according to the vector analyses.
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of astigmatic laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures between two different platforms using J0 and J45 vector analysis. METHODS:Patients were divided into four groups, depending on the type of astigmatism and laser platform on which they were treated. Astigmatism was between 2 and 7 diopters (D). One hundred and thirty-five patients with myopic astigmatism (246 eyes) and 102 patients with mixed astigmatism (172 eyes) underwent unremarkable LASIK correction on Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400Hz and Schwind Amaris 750S laser platform. The preoperative and postoperative sphere, negative cylinder [C] and axis (ø) of manifest refractions were subjected to vector analysis by calculations of the standard J0 (cos [4π(ø-90)/360]xC/2) and J45 (sin[4π(ø-90)/360]xC/2). RESULTS: Reporting the key results, we found J0 significantly reduced after LASIK in both groups (p < 0.001) but not J45. There was no significant association between individual pairs of pre and postoperative J0 & J45 values. There was no significant difference between the outcomes of the two platforms. CONCLUSIONS: Wavelight Allegretto 400Hz and Schwind Amaris 750S showed excellent results for treating patients with astigmatism, regardless whether it is mixed or myopic astigmatism. The J45 did not reduce significantly possibly because of the low number of eyes with oblique astigmatism. There was no genuine difference post-operatively between groups treated on two different laser platforms according to the vector analyses.
Authors: Eva M Krall; Eva M Arlt; Melchior Hohensinn; Sarah Moussa; Gerlinde Jell; Jorge L Alió; Ana B Plaza-Puche; Lucia Bascaran; Javier Mendicute; Günther Grabner; Alois K Dexl Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.351