Fred Burge1, Beverley Lawson1, Grace Johnston2, Yukiko Asada3, Paul F McIntyre4, Gordon Flowerdew3. 1. 1 Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada . 2. 2 School of Health Administration, Dalhousie University , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada . 3. 3 Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada . 4. 4 Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre , Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fulfillment of patient preferences for location of dying is of continued end-of-life care interest. Of those voicing a preference, most prefer home. However the majority of deaths occur in an institutional setting. OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to report on the congruence between the last preferred and actual location of death among adult Nova Scotians who died from chronic disease, and to identify individual, illness-related, and environmental factors associated with achieving a preferred home death. METHODS: The study employed a population-based mortality follow-back telephone survey interview. Subjects were eligible death certificate identified informants (next-of-kin) of adults (aged 18+) (n = 1316) who died of advanced chronic diseases in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia between June 2009 and May 2011 who were knowledgeable about the decedent's care over the last month of life. Congruence was assessed as to whether or not the decedent died in their preferred death location. Among decedents preferring a home death, individual, illness-related, and environmental risk factor multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of home death achievement. RESULTS: Among all who voiced a preference (n = 606), 52% died in their preferred location (kappa: 0.29). Factors contributing independently to achievement of a preferred home death were emotional needs being met, nursing and family physician home visits, palliative care program involvement, and being at home for the majority of the last month. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies elements of primary and integrated care that address the gap between preferred and actual place of care.
BACKGROUND: Fulfillment of patient preferences for location of dying is of continued end-of-life care interest. Of those voicing a preference, most prefer home. However the majority of deaths occur in an institutional setting. OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to report on the congruence between the last preferred and actual location of death among adult Nova Scotians who died from chronic disease, and to identify individual, illness-related, and environmental factors associated with achieving a preferred home death. METHODS: The study employed a population-based mortality follow-back telephone survey interview. Subjects were eligible death certificate identified informants (next-of-kin) of adults (aged 18+) (n = 1316) who died of advanced chronic diseases in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia between June 2009 and May 2011 who were knowledgeable about the decedent's care over the last month of life. Congruence was assessed as to whether or not the decedent died in their preferred death location. Among decedents preferring a home death, individual, illness-related, and environmental risk factor multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of home death achievement. RESULTS: Among all who voiced a preference (n = 606), 52% died in their preferred location (kappa: 0.29). Factors contributing independently to achievement of a preferred home death were emotional needs being met, nursing and family physician home visits, palliative care program involvement, and being at home for the majority of the last month. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies elements of primary and integrated care that address the gap between preferred and actual place of care.
Authors: Ariel Shalev; Veerawat Phongtankuel; Katherine Lampa; M C Reid; Brian M Eiss; Sonica Bhatia; Ronald D Adelman Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2017-10-08 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Seelwan Sathitratanacheewin; Ruth A Engelberg; Lois Downey; Robert Y Lee; James A Fausto; Helene Starks; Ben Dunlap; James Sibley; William Lober; Elizabeth T Loggers; Nita Khandelwal; J Randall Curtis Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jiaoli Cai; Li Zhang; Denise Guerriere; Hongli Fan; Peter C Coyte Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sofía García-Sanjuán; Manuel Fernández-Alcántara; Violeta Clement-Carbonell; Concepción Petra Campos-Calderón; Núria Orts-Beneito; María José Cabañero-Martínez Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-01-13
Authors: Channing E Tate; Grace Venechuk; Elinor J Brereton; Pilar Ingle; Larry A Allen; Megan A Morris; Daniel D Matlock Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 2.500