Literature DB >> 33590479

Caregiver support and place of death among older adults.

Lianlian Lei1, Lauren B Gerlach1, Victoria D Powell2, Donovan T Maust1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: As home becomes the most common place of death in the United States, information about caregiver support and place of death is critical to improve patient and caregiver experiences at end of life. We seek to examine (1) the association between family care availability and place of death; and (2) caregiving intensity associated with place of death.
DESIGN: 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving; nationally representative cross-sectional study of deceased older adults and last-month-of-life (LML) caregivers.
SETTING: United States; all places of deaths. PARTICIPANTS: Three-hundred and seventy-five decedents and 267 LML caregivers. MEASUREMENTS: Place of death (home, hospital, and nursing or hospice facility), family care availability (spouse/partner, household size, number of daughters and sons), caregiving intensity (hours of help provided at LML and a binary indicator for high care-related emotional difficulty).
RESULTS: 38.9% of older adults died at home, followed by hospital (33.1%), and nursing or hospice facility (28.0%). In an adjusted multinomial logistic regression, decedents with larger household size (odds ratio [OR]: 0.441; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.269-0.724) and more daughters (OR: 0.743 [95% CI: 0.575-0.958]) had lower odds of dying in nursing or hospice facility relative to dying at home. For older adults who died at home, caregivers provided 209.8 h of help at LML. In contrast, when death occurred in nursing or hospice facility, caregivers provided 91.6 fewer hours of help, adjusted for decedent and caregiver characteristics. Dying in hospital was associated with higher odds of caregiver emotional difficulty relative to home deaths (OR: 4.093 [95% CI: 1.623-10.323]).
CONCLUSIONS: Household size and number of daughters are important determinants of place of death. Despite dying at home being associated with more hours of direct caregiving; caregiver emotional strain was experienced as higher for hospital deaths. Better support services for end-of-life caregivers might improve patient and caregiver experiences for home and hospital deaths.
© 2021 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregiving intensity; family care availability; place of death

Year:  2021        PMID: 33590479      PMCID: PMC8127348          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  25 in total

1.  Trends in causes of death among the elderly.

Authors:  N R Sahyoun; H Lentzner; D Hoyert; K N Robinson
Journal:  Aging Trends       Date:  2001-03

2.  End-of-life care: findings from a national survey of informal caregivers.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Sydney M Dy; Kevin D Frick; Judith D Kasper
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-08

3.  Medical Comorbidities of Dementia: Links to Caregivers' Emotional Difficulties and Gains.

Authors:  Courtney A Polenick; Lillian Min; Helen C Kales
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Changes in the Place of Death in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah H Cross; Haider J Warraich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Place of death and the differences in patient quality of death and dying and caregiver burden.

Authors:  Hiroya Kinoshita; Isseki Maeda; Tatsuya Morita; Mitsunori Miyashita; Akemi Yamagishi; Yutaka Shirahige; Toru Takebayashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Ayumi Igarashi; Kenji Eguchi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Late Transitions and Bereaved Family Member Perceptions of Quality of End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Lena K Makaroun; Joan M Teno; Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Pedro Gozalo; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences.

Authors:  I J Higginson; G J Sen-Gupta
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009.

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Julie P W Bynum; Natalie E Leland; Susan C Miller; Nancy E Morden; Thomas Scupp; David C Goodman; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Factors associated with site of death: a national study of where people die.

Authors:  Sherry Weitzen; Joan M Teno; Mary Fennell; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  A National Profile Of End-Of-Life Caregiving In The United States.

Authors:  Katherine A Ornstein; Amy S Kelley; Evan Bollens-Lund; Jennifer L Wolff
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk factors associated with poorer experiences of end-of-life care and challenges in early bereavement: Results of a national online survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lucy Ellen Selman; Djj Farnell; M Longo; S Goss; K Seddon; A Torrens-Burton; C R Mayland; D Wakefield; B Johnston; A Byrne; E Harrop
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.762

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.