Literature DB >> 26395588

Evolution of reduced post-copulatory molecular interactions in Drosophila populations lacking sperm competition.

B Hollis1,2, D Houle3, T J Kawecki1.   

Abstract

In many species with internal fertilization, molecules transferred in the male ejaculate trigger and interact with physiological changes in females. It is controversial to what extent these interactions between the sexes act synergistically to mediate the female switch to a reproductive state or instead reflect sexual antagonism evolved as a by product of sexual selection on males. To address this question, we eliminated sexual selection by enforcing monogamy in populations of Drosophila melanogaster for 65 generations and then measured the expression of male seminal fluid protein genes and genes involved in the female response to mating. In the absence of sperm competition, male and female reproductive interests are perfectly aligned and any antagonism should be reduced by natural selection. Consistent with this idea, males from monogamous populations showed reduced expression of seminal fluid protein genes, 16% less on average than in polygamous males. Further, we identified 428 genes that responded to mating in females. After mating, females with an evolutionary history of monogamy exhibited lower relative expression of genes that were up regulated in response to mating and higher expression of genes that were down-regulated--in other words, their post-mating transcriptome appeared more virgin-like. Surprisingly, these genes showed a similar pattern even before mating, suggesting that monogamous females evolved to be less poised for mating and the accompanying receipt of male seminal fluid proteins. This reduced investment by both monogamous males and females in molecules involved in post-copulatory interactions points to a pervasive role of sexual conflict in shaping these interactions.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; experimental evolution; female post-mating response; gene expression; sexual conflict; sexual selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26395588     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  7 in total

Review 1.  Seminal fluid and accessory male investment in sperm competition.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Thomas C Nelson; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Roles of Female and Male Genotype in Post-Mating Responses in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sofie Y N Delbare; Clement Y Chow; Mariana F Wolfner; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.645

4.  The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.

Authors:  Ben R Hopkins; Jennifer C Perry
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-06

5.  Sexual conflict drives male manipulation of female postmating responses in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; Mareike Koppik; Kristina U Wensing; Hanna Ruhmann; Eléonore Genzoni; Berra Erkosar; Tadeusz J Kawecki; Claudia Fricke; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Experimental sexual selection reveals rapid evolutionary divergence in sex-specific transcriptomes and their interactions following mating.

Authors:  Paris Veltsos; Damiano Porcelli; Yongxiang Fang; Andrew R Cossins; Michael G Ritchie; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.622

7.  Pronounced Postmating Response in the Drosophila Female Reproductive Tract Fluid Proteome.

Authors:  Caitlin E McDonough-Goldstein; Emma Whittington; Erin L McCullough; Sharleen M Buel; Scott Erdman; Scott Pitnick; Steve Dorus
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 7.381

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.