Literature DB >> 29036644

Roles of Female and Male Genotype in Post-Mating Responses in Drosophila melanogaster.

Sofie Y N Delbare1, Clement Y Chow1,2, Mariana F Wolfner1, Andrew G Clark1.   

Abstract

Mating induces a multitude of changes in female behavior, physiology, and gene expression. Interactions between female and male genotype lead to variation in post-mating phenotypes and reproductive success. So far, few female molecules responsible for these interactions have been identified. Here, we used Drosophila melanogaster from 5 geographically dispersed populations to investigate such female × male genotypic interactions at the female transcriptomic and phenotypic levels. Females from each line were singly-mated to males from the same 5 lines, for a total of 25 combinations. Reproductive output and refractoriness to re-mating were assayed in females from the 25 mating combinations. Female × male genotypic interactions resulted in significant differences in these post-mating phenotypes. To assess whether female × male genotypic interactions affect the female post-mating transcriptome, next-generation RNA sequencing was performed on virgin and mated females at 5 to 6 h post-mating. Seventy-seven genes showed strong variation in mating-induced expression changes in a female × male genotype-dependent manner. These genes were enriched for immune response and odorant-binding functions, and for expression exclusively in the head. Strikingly, variation in post-mating transcript levels of a gene encoding a spermathecal endopeptidase was correlated with short-term egg production. The transcriptional variation found in specific functional classes of genes might be a read-out of female × male compatibility at a molecular level. Understanding the roles these genes play in the female post-mating response will be crucial to better understand the evolution of post-mating responses and related conflicts between the sexes. © The American Genetic Association 2017. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global Diversity Lines; female × male genotype interactions; immune system; reproduction; sexual conflict; transcriptome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29036644      PMCID: PMC5892397          DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esx081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  114 in total

1.  A genome-wide analysis of courting and mating responses in Drosophila melanogaster females.

Authors:  Mara K N Lawniczak; David J Begun
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.166

2.  An ectopic expression screen reveals the protective and toxic effects of Drosophila seminal fluid proteins.

Authors:  Jacob L Mueller; Jennifer L Page; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"?

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Reproductive isolation among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.

Authors:  Jackson H Jennings; Rhonda R Snook; Anneli Hoikkala
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Lineage-Specific Evolution of the Complex Nup160 Hybrid Incompatibility Between Drosophila melanogaster and Its Sister Species.

Authors:  Shanwu Tang; Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Post-mating change in excretion by mated Drosophila melanogaster females is a long-term response that depends on sex peptide and sperm.

Authors:  Jennifer Apger-McGlaughon; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Dynamic, mating-induced gene expression changes in female head and brain tissues of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Justin E Dalton; Tanvi S Kacheria; Simon Rv Knott; Matthew S Lebo; Allison Nishitani; Laura E Sanders; Emma J Stirling; Ari Winbush; Michelle N Arbeitman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Transcriptional and epigenetic responses to mating and aging in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhou; Trudy F C Mackay; Robert R H Anholt
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Tissue remodeling: a mating-induced differentiation program for the Drosophila oviduct.

Authors:  Anat Kapelnikov; Patricia K Rivlin; Ronald R Hoy; Yael Heifetz
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 1.978

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Gamete-mediated mate choice: towards a more inclusive view of sexual selection.

Authors:  Jukka Kekäläinen; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Quantitative proteomics reveals rapid divergence in the postmating response of female reproductive tracts among sibling species.

Authors:  Erin L McCullough; Caitlin E McDonough; Scott Pitnick; Steve Dorus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  She's got nerve: roles of octopamine in insect female reproduction.

Authors:  Melissa A White; Dawn S Chen; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 1.696

4.  Divergence in Transcriptional and Regulatory Responses to Mating in Male and Female Fruitflies.

Authors:  Emily K Fowler; Thomas Bradley; Simon Moxon; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Within-population sperm competition intensity does not predict asymmetry in conpopulation sperm precedence.

Authors:  Martin D Garlovsky; Leeban H Yusuf; Michael G Ritchie; Rhonda R Snook
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Differences in Postmating Transcriptional Responses between Conspecific and Heterospecific Matings in Drosophila.

Authors:  Yasir H Ahmed-Braimah; Mariana F Wolfner; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Gene expression and alternative splicing dynamics are perturbed in female head transcriptomes following heterospecific copulation.

Authors:  Fernando Diaz; Carson W Allan; Therese Ann Markow; Jeremy M Bono; Luciano M Matzkin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Temporal and sequential order of nonoverlapping gene networks unraveled in mated female Drosophila.

Authors:  Claude Pasquier; Alain Robichon
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2021-11-29

9.  The Drosophila Post-mating Response: Gene Expression and Behavioral Changes Reveal Perdurance and Variation in Cross-Tissue Interactions.

Authors:  Nicole R Newell; Surjyendu Ray; Justin E Dalton; Julia C Fortier; Joyce Y Kao; Peter L Chang; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Michelle N Arbeitman
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Interactions between the microbiome and mating influence the female's transcriptional profile in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sofie Y N Delbare; Yasir H Ahmed-Braimah; Mariana F Wolfner; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.