Lawrence P Panych1,2, Jr-Yuan George Chiou1,2, Lei Qin2,3, Vera L Kimbrell1, Lisa Bussolari1, Robert V Mulkern1,2,4. 1. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether measurements on American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom images performed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologists as part of a weekly quality control (QC) program could be performed exclusively using an automated system without compromising the integrity of the QC program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ACR phantom images are acquired on 15 MRI scanners at a number of ACR-accredited sites to fulfill requirements of a weekly QC program. MRI technologists routinely perform several measurements on these images. Software routines are also used to perform the measurements. A set of geometry measurements made by technologists over a five week period and those made using software routines were compared to reference-standard measurements made by two MRI physicists. RESULTS: The geometry measurements performed by software routines had a very high positive correlation (0.92) with the reference-standard measurements. Technologist measurements also had a high positive correlation (0.63), although the correlation was less than for the automated measurements. Bland-Altman analysis revealed overall good agreement between the automated and reference-standard measurements, with the 95% limits of agreement being within ±0.62 mm. Agreement between the technologist and the reference-standard measurements was demonstratively poorer, with 95% limits of agreement being ±1.46 mm. Some of the technologist measurements differed from the reference standard by as much as 2 mm. CONCLUSION: The technologists' geometry measurements may be able to be replaced by automated measurement without compromising the weekly QC program required by the ACR.
PURPOSE: To assess whether measurements on American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom images performed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologists as part of a weekly quality control (QC) program could be performed exclusively using an automated system without compromising the integrity of the QC program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ACR phantom images are acquired on 15 MRI scanners at a number of ACR-accredited sites to fulfill requirements of a weekly QC program. MRI technologists routinely perform several measurements on these images. Software routines are also used to perform the measurements. A set of geometry measurements made by technologists over a five week period and those made using software routines were compared to reference-standard measurements made by two MRI physicists. RESULTS: The geometry measurements performed by software routines had a very high positive correlation (0.92) with the reference-standard measurements. Technologist measurements also had a high positive correlation (0.63), although the correlation was less than for the automated measurements. Bland-Altman analysis revealed overall good agreement between the automated and reference-standard measurements, with the 95% limits of agreement being within ±0.62 mm. Agreement between the technologist and the reference-standard measurements was demonstratively poorer, with 95% limits of agreement being ±1.46 mm. Some of the technologist measurements differed from the reference standard by as much as 2 mm. CONCLUSION: The technologists' geometry measurements may be able to be replaced by automated measurement without compromising the weekly QC program required by the ACR.