| Literature DB >> 26393614 |
Bhanu Neupane1, Tao Jin2, Liliana F Mellor3, Elizabeth G Loboa4, Frances S Ligler5, Gufeng Wang6.
Abstract
Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy provides a new opportunity to study fine sub-cellular structures and highly dynamic cellular processes, which are challenging to observe using conventional optical microscopy. Using actin as an example, we explored the feasibility of using a continuous wave (CW)-STED microscope to study the fine structure and dynamics in fixed and live cells. Actin plays an important role in cellular processes, whose functioning involves dynamic formation and reorganization of fine structures of actin filaments. Frequently used confocal fluorescence and STED microscopy dyes were employed to image fixed PC-12 cells (dyed with phalloidin- fluorescein isothiocyante) and live rat chondrosarcoma cells (RCS) transfected with actin-green fluorescent protein (GFP). Compared to conventional confocal fluorescence microscopy, CW-STED microscopy shows improved spatial resolution in both fixed and live cells. We were able to monitor cell morphology changes continuously; however, the number of repetitive analyses were limited primarily by the dyes used in these experiments and could be improved with the use of dyes less susceptible to photobleaching. In conclusion, CW-STED may disclose new information for biological systems with a proper characteristic length scale. The challenges of using CW-STED microscopy to study cell structures are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: PC-12 cells; actin cytoskeleton; rat chondrosarcoma cells; stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy; super resolution optical microscopy
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26393614 PMCID: PMC4610488 DOI: 10.3390/s150924178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1CW-STED microscopy. (A) Schematic of our home-built CW-STED microscope; (B) Confocal images of 45 nm FITC-doped polystyrene nanoparticles; (C) CW-STED image in the same area. The 2 µm scale bar applies to both images; (D) and (E) Representative cross-sections of the confocal and CW-STED images of the 45 nm particles.
Figure 2Confocal and CW-STED images of fixed PC-12 cells stained with phalloidin-FITC. (A) Confocal image of PC-12 cell with different sized neurites; (B) Expanded views of three selected neurites of different diameters; B and B’ refer to confocal and STED images, respectively; (C) A pair of confocal and STED images of another typical neurite showing an increase in geometric resolution for the STED image.
Figure 3Confocal and STED images of live rat chondrocyte cells transfected with green fluorescent protein. (A) Confocal image of chondrocyte cells; (B) Confocal image of selected cells; (C–F) STED images of the same cells at different times. The scale bar in (B) also applies to (C–F).
Figure 4Fluorescence intensity in CW-STED imaging. (A) Comparison of confocal and STED image intensity. The intensity was measured from the maximum intensity of five cell features with similar intensities in Figure 3. The error bar is calculated from the standard deviation of the intensity of the five cell features; (B) Photobleaching of STED image upon multiple exposures to the depletion laser beam. Black curve: the average intensity of the whole image in Figure 3. The other five curves: the maximum intensity of five selected cell features in Figure 3 at different exposures. The total image intensity decays smoothly while the cell feature intensity fluctuated slightly because of the movement of the live cell.