Literature DB >> 26391228

Perceptions of One's Neighborhood and Mammogram Use among a Sample of Low-Income Women at Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Melissa A Davey-Rothwell1, Janice Bowie2, Laura Murray2, Carl A Latkin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neighborhood disorder, signs of physical and social disorganization, has been related to a range of poor mental and physical health outcomes. Although individual factors have been widely associated with getting a mammogram, little is known about the impact of the neighborhood environment on a woman's decision to get a mammogram.
METHODS: In a sample of women at risk for human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted infections, we explored the role of perceptions of one's neighborhood on getting a mammogram. The study included two samples: women 40 to 49 years (n = 233) and women 50 years and older (n = 83). Data were collected from May 2006 through June 2008.
RESULTS: Women age 50 years and older who lived in a neighborhood with disorder were 72% less likely to get a mammogram compared with women who lived in neighborhoods without disorder. There was no relationship for women age 40 to 49 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions are needed to increase awareness and encourage women living in neighborhoods with disorder to get a mammogram. In addition to interventions to increase mammography, programs are needed to decrease neighborhood disorder. Increasing neighborhood cohesion, social control, and empowerment could integrate health promotion programs to both reduce disorder and increase health behaviors.
Copyright © 2016 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26391228      PMCID: PMC4761282          DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  40 in total

1.  Stressful neighborhoods and depression: a prospective study of the impact of neighborhood disorder.

Authors:  Carl A Latkin; Aaron D Curry
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2003-03

2.  Equity in the access to mammography in Spain.

Authors:  S Luengo; P Lázaro; R Madero; F Alvira; K Fitch; B Azcona; J M Pérez; P Caballero
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Geographic disparities in mammography capacity in the South: a longitudinal assessment of supply and demand.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Karl Eschbach; Jeffrey S Morris; Hoang T Nguyen; Md Monir Hossain; Linda S Elting
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Disparities in cancer diagnosis and survival.

Authors:  C J Bradley; C W Given; C Roberts
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program.

Authors:  A R Aro; H J de Koning; P Absetz; M Schreck
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The role of social capital in African-American women's use of mammography.

Authors:  Lorraine Dean; S V Subramanian; David R Williams; Katrina Armstrong; Camille Zubrinsky Charles; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  [Attitudes of primary health care users to a colorectal cancer screening program].

Authors:  Maria Ramos; Maria Taltavull; Pilar Piñeiro; Raquel Nieto; Maria Llagostera
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 2.139

8.  Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.

Authors:  S J Katz; T P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer: distinguishing individual- and community-level effects.

Authors:  Stephanie A Robert; Indiana Strombom; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Jane A McElroy; Polly A Newcomb; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Mobile mammography in underserved populations: analysis of outcomes of 3,923 women.

Authors:  Sandra E Brooks; Tina M Hembree; Brent J Shelton; Sydney C Beache; Greta Aschbacher; Philip H Schervish; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Psychological and neighborhood factors associated with urban women's preventive care use.

Authors:  Cindy B Veldhuis; Pauline Maki; Kristine Molina
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-12-21

2.  Mothers with justice-involved sons: Socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19 by neighborhood disorder in the United States.

Authors:  Alyssa LaBerge; Amanda Isabel Osuna; Caitlin Cavanagh; Elizabeth Cauffman
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  2022-07-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.