Literature DB >> 11768605

Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program.

A R Aro1, H J de Koning, P Absetz, M Schreck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find out reasons for non-attendance and to study subgroup differences of the non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program.
DESIGN: Prospective for background and psychosocial factors, retrospective for reasons of non-attendance.
SETTING: Finnish screening based on personal first round invitations, with 89% attendance rate. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred thirty six women with both pre-screening response to socioeconomic and psychosocial measures, and post-screening response reporting reasons of non-attendance. MAIN
RESULTS: Most common single reason for non-attendance was previous recent mammogram (53%), but also reasons related to practical obstacles, worry and fear, knowledge and attitudes, and organization of screening were mentioned. Two distinct groups of non-attenders were found based on the reasons for non-attendance. Those who did not attend because a mammogram taken elsewhere (ELSE, n = 233) were urban, well-to-do women, who took care of their health by own initiation and felt more susceptible to breast cancer, and also expected mammogram to be painful. Other (real) non-attenders (REAL, n = 155) were less compliant with health recommendations and services, more socially isolated, depressed and anxious than ELSE. Level of depression among REAL was clearly higher (10.80) than the mean value (7.91, SD = 7.28) of the age group, and was also slightly above the cut-off score of 10 indicating mild or moderate depression. Trait anxiety was also markedly higher (40.18) than that of the same age group (37.76, SD = 8.95).
CONCLUSIONS: Further research should clarify determinants and consequences of depression and anxiety among real non-attenders. Knowledge gaps and attitudinal barriers among non-attenders require more targeted campaigns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11768605     DOI: 10.1023/a:1012939228916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  32 in total

Review 1.  Depression as a risk factor for underuse of mammography.

Authors:  Hillary R Bogner; Marsha N Wittink
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Disparities in knowledge of mouth or throat cancer among rural Floridians.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Elizabeth A Pomery; Virginia J Dodd; Keith E Muller; Yi Guo; Henrietta L Logan
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  A triple play: psychological distress, physical comorbidities, and access and use of health services among U.S. adults with disabilities.

Authors:  Catherine A Okoro; Satvinder S Dhingra; Chaoyang Li
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-05

4.  Perceptions of One's Neighborhood and Mammogram Use among a Sample of Low-Income Women at Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Melissa A Davey-Rothwell; Janice Bowie; Laura Murray; Carl A Latkin
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-09-26

5.  Psychosocial factors associated with mouth and throat cancer examinations in rural Florida.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Virginia J Dodd; Keith E Muller; Yi Guo; Henrietta L Logan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Perceived barriers to mammography among underserved women in a Breast Health Center Outreach Program.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Susan Kraenzle; Bettina F Drake; Masayoshi Oka; Melody S Goodman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Participation in biomedical research studies and cancer screenings: perceptions of risks to minorities compared with whites.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; Min Qi Wang; B Lee Green; Nancy R Kressin; Cristina Claudio; Stefanie Luise Russell; Christelle Sommervil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Psychological distress as a barrier to preventive healthcare among U.S. women.

Authors:  Whitney P Witt; Robert Kahn; Lisa Fortuna; Jonathan Winickoff; Karen Kuhlthau; Paul A Pirraglia; Timothy Ferris
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2009-08-19

9.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Public awareness of cancer in Britain: a population-based survey of adults.

Authors:  K Robb; S Stubbings; A Ramirez; U Macleod; J Austoker; J Waller; S Hiom; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.