Literature DB >> 26386728

In vitro screening for population variability in toxicity of pesticide-containing mixtures.

Nour Abdo1, Barbara A Wetmore2, Grace A Chappell3, Damian Shea4, Fred A Wright5, Ivan Rusyn6.   

Abstract

Population-based human in vitro models offer exceptional opportunities for evaluating the potential hazard and mode of action of chemicals, as well as variability in responses to toxic insults among individuals. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that comparative population genomics with efficient in vitro experimental design can be used for evaluation of the potential for hazard, mode of action, and the extent of population variability in responses to chemical mixtures. We selected 146 lymphoblast cell lines from 4 ancestrally and geographically diverse human populations based on the availability of genome sequence and basal RNA-seq data. Cells were exposed to two pesticide mixtures - an environmental surface water sample comprised primarily of organochlorine pesticides and a laboratory-prepared mixture of 36 currently used pesticides - in concentration response and evaluated for cytotoxicity. On average, the two mixtures exhibited a similar range of in vitro cytotoxicity and showed considerable inter-individual variability across screened cell lines. However, when in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) coupled with reverse dosimetry was employed to convert the in vitro cytotoxic concentrations to oral equivalent doses and compared to the upper bound of predicted human exposure, we found that a nominally more cytotoxic chlorinated pesticide mixture is expected to have greater margin of safety (more than 5 orders of magnitude) as compared to the current use pesticide mixture (less than 2 orders of magnitude) due primarily to differences in exposure predictions. Multivariate genome-wide association mapping revealed an association between the toxicity of current use pesticide mixture and a polymorphism in rs1947825 in C17orf54. We conclude that a combination of in vitro human population-based cytotoxicity screening followed by dosimetric adjustment and comparative population genomics analyses enables quantitative evaluation of human health hazard from complex environmental mixtures. Additionally, such an approach yields testable hypotheses regarding potential toxicity mechanisms.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mixture; Pesticide; Population

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26386728      PMCID: PMC4773193          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  40 in total

1.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Incorporating population variability and susceptible subpopulations into dosimetry for high-throughput toxicity testing.

Authors:  Barbara A Wetmore; Brittany Allen; Harvey J Clewell; Timothy Parker; John F Wambaugh; Lisa M Almond; Mark A Sochaski; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  New directions in toxicity testing.

Authors:  Daniel Krewski; Margit Westphal; Mustafa Al-Zoughool; Maxine C Croteau; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  In vitro screening for population variability in chemical toxicity.

Authors:  Shannon H O'Shea; John Schwarz; Oksana Kosyk; Pamela K Ross; Min Jin Ha; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: bringing the vision to life.

Authors:  Melvin E Andersen; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Non-cancer health effects of pesticides: systematic review and implications for family doctors.

Authors:  M Sanborn; K J Kerr; L H Sanin; D C Cole; K L Bassil; C Vakil
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  National toxicovigilance for pesticide exposures resulting in health care contact - An example from the UK's National Poisons Information Service.

Authors:  L Perry; R D Adams; A R Bennett; D J Lupton; G Jackson; A M Good; S H L Thomas; J A Vale; J P Thompson; D N Bateman; M Eddleston
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.467

8.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Addressing human variability in next-generation human health risk assessments of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Lauren Zeise; Frederic Y Bois; Weihsueh A Chiu; Dale Hattis; Ivan Rusyn; Kathryn Z Guyton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Pesticide risk assessment and management in a globally changing world--report from a European interdisciplinary workshop.

Authors:  Marc Babut; Gertie H Arts; Anna Barra Caracciolo; Nadia Carluer; Nicolas Domange; Nikolai Friberg; Véronique Gouy; Merete Grung; Laurent Lagadic; Fabrice Martin-Laurent; Nicolas Mazzella; Stéphane Pesce; Benoit Real; Stefan Reichenberger; Erwin W M Roex; Kees Romijn; Manfred Röttele; Marianne Stenrød; Julien Tournebize; Françoise Vernier; Eric Vindimian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.223

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating population-level genetic variability within laboratory models in toxicology: From the individual to the population.

Authors:  Peter Dornbos; John J LaPres
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 2.  The Impact of Novel Assessment Methodologies in Toxicology on Green Chemistry and Chemical Alternatives.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Nigel Greene
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Advancing chemical risk assessment decision-making with population variability data: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Methods for evaluating variability in human health dose-response characterization.

Authors:  Daniel A Axelrad; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas F Bateson; Michael DeVito; Rebecca C Dzubow; Julie W Fitzpatrick; Alicia M Frame; Karen A Hogan; Keith Houck; Michael Stewart
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 5.  Model systems and organisms for addressing inter- and intra-species variability in risk assessment.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  A tiered, Bayesian approach to estimating of population variability for regulatory decision-making.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 6.043

7.  Leveraging human genetic and adverse outcome pathway (AOP) data to inform susceptibility in human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Holly M Mortensen; John Chamberlin; Bonnie Joubert; Michelle Angrish; Nisha Sipes; Janice S Lee; Susan Y Euling
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.224

8.  Evaluation of time-dependent toxicity and combined effects for a series of mono-halogenated acetonitrile-containing binary mixtures.

Authors:  Douglas A Dawson; Daphne Guinn; Gerald Pöch
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-07-25

Review 9.  An Overview of Literature Topics Related to Current Concepts, Methods, Tools, and Applications for Cumulative Risk Assessment (2007-2016).

Authors:  Mary A Fox; L Elizabeth Brewer; Lawrence Martin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  The Next Generation of Risk Assessment Multi-Year Study-Highlights of Findings, Applications to Risk Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ila Cote; Melvin E Andersen; Gerald T Ankley; Stanley Barone; Linda S Birnbaum; Kim Boekelheide; Frederic Y Bois; Lyle D Burgoon; Weihsueh A Chiu; Douglas Crawford-Brown; Kevin M Crofton; Michael DeVito; Robert B Devlin; Stephen W Edwards; Kathryn Z Guyton; Dale Hattis; Richard S Judson; Derek Knight; Daniel Krewski; Jason Lambert; Elizabeth Anne Maull; Donna Mendrick; Gregory M Paoli; Chirag Jagdish Patel; Edward J Perkins; Gerald Poje; Christopher J Portier; Ivan Rusyn; Paul A Schulte; Anton Simeonov; Martyn T Smith; Kristina A Thayer; Russell S Thomas; Reuben Thomas; Raymond R Tice; John J Vandenberg; Daniel L Villeneuve; Scott Wesselkamper; Maurice Whelan; Christine Whittaker; Ronald White; Menghang Xia; Carole Yauk; Lauren Zeise; Jay Zhao; Robert S DeWoskin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.