Literature DB >> 29275117

Incorporating population-level genetic variability within laboratory models in toxicology: From the individual to the population.

Peter Dornbos1, John J LaPres2.   

Abstract

Humans respond to chemical exposures differently due to many factors, such as previous and concurrent stressors, age, sex, and genetic background. The vast majority of laboratory-based toxicology studies, however, have not considered the impact of population-level variability within dose-response relationships. The lack of data dealing with the influence of genetic diversity on the response to chemical exposure provides a difficult challenge for risk assessment as individuals within the population will display a wide-range of responses following toxicant challenge. Notably, the genetic background of individuals plays a major role in the variability seen in a population-level response to a drug or chemical and, thus, there is growing interest in including genetic diversity into laboratory-models. Here we outline several laboratory-based models that can be used to assay the influence of genetic variability on an individual's response to chemicals: 1) genetically-diverse cell lines, 2) human primary cells, 3) and genetically-diverse mouse panels. We also provide a succinct review for several seminal studies to highlight the capability, feasibility, and power of each of these models. This article is intended to highlight the need to include population-level genetic diversity into toxicological study designs via laboratory-based models with the goal to provide and supplement evidence in assessing the risk posed by chemicals to the human population. As such, incorporation of genetic variability will positively impact human-based risk assessment and provide empirical data to aid and influence decision-making processes in relation to chemical exposures.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic variability; Population-Based models; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29275117      PMCID: PMC5801153          DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  63 in total

Review 1.  Inheritance and drug response.

Authors:  Richard Weinshilboum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Benzene-induced micronuclei in erythrocytes: an inhalation concentration-response study in B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  G M Farris; V A Wong; B A Wong; D B Janszen; R S Shah
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Interstrain differences in the liver effects of trichloroethylene in a multistrain panel of inbred mice.

Authors:  Blair U Bradford; Eric F Lock; Oksana Kosyk; Sungkyoon Kim; Takeki Uehara; David Harbourt; Michelle DeSimone; David W Threadgill; Volodymyr Tryndyak; Igor P Pogribny; Lisa Bleyle; Dennis R Koop; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Toxicogenetics: population-based testing of drug and chemical safety in mouse models.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Daniel M Gatti; Timothy Wiltshire; Timothy Wilshire; Steven R Kleeberger; David W Threadgill
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  In vitro screening for population variability in chemical toxicity.

Authors:  Shannon H O'Shea; John Schwarz; Oksana Kosyk; Pamela K Ross; Min Jin Ha; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  In vitro screening for population variability in toxicity of pesticide-containing mixtures.

Authors:  Nour Abdo; Barbara A Wetmore; Grace A Chappell; Damian Shea; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Genetic and haplotype diversity among wild-derived mouse inbred strains.

Authors:  Folami Y Ideraabdullah; Elena de la Casa-Esperón; Timothy A Bell; David A Detwiler; Terry Magnuson; Carmen Sapienza; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Copy number variation in sulfotransferase isoform 1A1 (SULT1A1) is significantly associated with enzymatic activity in Japanese subjects.

Authors:  Xinfeng Yu; Takahiro Kubota; Ishwori Dhakal; Setsuo Hasegawa; Suzanne Williams; Shogo Ozawa; Susan Kadlubar
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2013-03-06

10.  Addressing human variability in next-generation human health risk assessments of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Lauren Zeise; Frederic Y Bois; Weihsueh A Chiu; Dale Hattis; Ivan Rusyn; Kathryn Z Guyton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  Host genetics and gut microbiota cooperatively contribute to azoxymethane-induced acute toxicity in Collaborative Cross mice.

Authors:  Chenhan Zhong; Li He; Sun-Young Lee; Hang Chang; Yuqing Zhang; David W Threadgill; Ying Yuan; Fuling Zhou; Susan E Celniker; Yankai Xia; Antoine M Snijders; Jian-Hua Mao
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Genetic background and sex control the outcome of high-fat diet feeding in mice.

Authors:  Alexis Maximilien Bachmann; Jean-David Morel; Gaby El Alam; Sandra Rodríguez-López; Tanes Imamura de Lima; Ludger J E Goeminne; Giorgia Benegiamo; Sylvain Loric; Marc Conti; Maroun Bou Sleiman; Johan Auwerx
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Characterizing Serpinb2 as a Modulator of TCDD-Induced Suppression of the B Cell.

Authors:  Peter Dornbos; Melanie Warren; Robert B Crawford; Norbert E Kaminski; David W Threadgill; John J LaPres
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Peanut butter as an alternative dose delivery method to prevent strain-dependent orogastric gavage-induced stress in mouse teratogenicity studies.

Authors:  Melanie R Warren; Andreea Radulescu; Peter Dornbos; Danila Cuomo; Shelby Zumwalt; Diana Bueso-Mendoza; Megan Nitcher; John J LaPres; David W Threadgill
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.285

5.  Toxic Responses Induced at High Doses May Affect Benchmark Doses.

Authors:  Jürg A Zarn; Ursina A Zürcher; H Christoph Geiser
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Application of evidence-based methods to construct mechanism-driven chemical assessment frameworks.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoffmann; Elisa Aiassa; Michelle Angrish; Claire Beausoleil; Frederic Y Bois; Laura Ciccolallo; Peter S Craig; Rob B M De Vries; Jean Lou C M Dorne; Ingrid L Druwe; Stephen W Edwards; Chantra Eskes; Marios Georgiadis; Thomas Hartung; Aude Kienzler; Elisabeth A Kristjansson; Juleen Lam; Laura Martino; Bette Meek; Rebecca L Morgan; Irene Munoz-Guajardo; Pamela D Noyes; Elena Parmelli; Aldert Piersma; Andrew Rooney; Emily Sena; Kristie Sullivan; José Tarazona; Andrea Terron; Kris Thayer; Jan Turner; Jos Verbeek; Didier Verloo; Mathieu Vinken; Sean Watford; Paul Whaley; Daniele Wikoff; Kate Willett; Katya Tsaioun
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.250

7.  Hepatocyte-like cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells using small molecules: implications of a transcriptomic study.

Authors:  Xiugong Gao; Rong Li; Patrick Cahan; Yang Zhao; Jeffrey J Yourick; Robert L Sprando
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 6.832

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.