Literature DB >> 24657900

Knowledge of sequence structure prevents auditory distraction: an ERP study.

Márta Volosin1, János Horváth2.   

Abstract

Infrequent, salient stimuli often capture attention despite their task-irrelevancy, and disrupt on-going goal-directed behavior. A number of studies show that presenting cues signaling forthcoming deviants reduces distraction, which may be a "by-product" of cue-processing interference or the result of direct preparatory processes for the forthcoming distracter. In the present study, instead of "bursts" of cue information, information on the temporal structure of the stimulus sequence was provided. Young adults performed a spatial discrimination task where complex tones moving left or right were presented. In the predictable condition, every 7th tone was a pitch-deviant, while in the random condition the position of deviants was random with a probability of 1/7. Whereas the early event-related potential correlates of deviance-processing (N1 and MMN) were unaffected by predictability, P3a amplitude was significantly reduced in the predictable condition, indicating that prevention of distraction was based on the knowledge about the temporal structure of the stimulus sequence.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attention; Distraction; ERP; P3a; Prediction; Regularity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24657900     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  5 in total

1.  Hierarchy of prediction errors for auditory events in human temporal and frontal cortex.

Authors:  Stefan Dürschmid; Erik Edwards; Christoph Reichert; Callum Dewar; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Heidi E Kirsch; Sarang S Dalal; Leon Y Deouell; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The event-related potential component P3a is diminished by identical deviance repetition, but not by non-identical repetitions.

Authors:  Timm Rosburg; Michael Weigl; Ronja Thiel; Ralph Mager
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of explicit knowledge and predictability on auditory distraction and target performance.

Authors:  Caroline Max; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  The effect of distraction on change detection in crowded acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Theofilos Petsas; Jemma Harrison; Makio Kashino; Shigeto Furukawa; Maria Chait
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Self-touch: Contact durations and point of touch of spontaneous facial self-touches differ depending on cognitive and emotional load.

Authors:  Stephanie Margarete Mueller; Sven Martin; Martin Grunwald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.