Literature DB >> 35150258

Improving genomic predictions with inbreeding and nonadditive effects in two admixed maize hybrid populations in single and multienvironment contexts.

Morgane Roth1, Aurélien Beugnot2, Tristan Mary-Huard2,3, Laurence Moreau2, Alain Charcosset2, Julie B Fiévet2.   

Abstract

Genetic admixture, resulting from the recombination between structural groups, is frequently encountered in breeding populations. In hybrid breeding, crossing admixed lines can generate substantial nonadditive genetic variance and contrasted levels of inbreeding which can impact trait variation. This study aimed at testing recent methodological developments for the modeling of inbreeding and nonadditive effects in order to increase prediction accuracy in admixed populations. Using two maize (Zea mays L.) populations of hybrids admixed between dent and flint heterotic groups, we compared a suite of five genomic prediction models incorporating (or not) parameters accounting for inbreeding and nonadditive effects with the natural and orthogonal interaction approach in single and multienvironment contexts. In both populations, variance decompositions showed the strong impact of inbreeding on plant yield, height, and flowering time which was supported by the superiority of prediction models incorporating this effect (+0.038 in predictive ability for mean yield). In most cases dominance variance was reduced when inbreeding was accounted for. The model including additivity, dominance, epistasis, and inbreeding effects appeared to be the most robust for prediction across traits and populations (+0.054 in predictive ability for mean yield). In a multienvironment context, we found that the inclusion of nonadditive and inbreeding effects was advantageous when predicting hybrids not yet observed in any environment. Overall, comparing variance decompositions was helpful to guide model selection for genomic prediction. Finally, we recommend the use of models including inbreeding and nonadditive parameters following the natural and orthogonal interaction approach to increase prediction accuracy in admixed populations.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GenPred; admixture; genomic prediction; genomic selection; genotype by environment interactions; inbreeding; nonadditive effects; shared data resource

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35150258      PMCID: PMC8982028          DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  75 in total

1.  Epistasis and genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Thomas E Juenger; Sáunak Sen; Kirk A Stowe; Ellen L Simms
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding.

Authors:  I J de Boer; I Hoeschele
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering.

Authors:  Sharon R Browning; Brian L Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.

Authors:  Patricio R Muñoz; Marcio F R Resende; Salvador A Gezan; Marcos Deon Vilela Resende; Gustavo de Los Campos; Matias Kirst; Dudley Huber; Gary F Peter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Expected influence of linkage disequilibrium on genetic variance caused by dominance and epistasis on quantitative traits.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Mäki-Tanila
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Linkage mapping of 1454 new maize candidate gene Loci.

Authors:  Matthieu Falque; Laurent Décousset; Delphine Dervins; Anne-Marie Jacob; Johann Joets; Jean-Pierre Martinant; Xavier Raffoux; Nicolas Ribière; Céline Ridel; Delphine Samson; Alain Charcosset; Alain Murigneux
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis.

Authors:  David González-Diéguez; Andrés Legarra; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau; Christina Lehermeier; Simon Teyssèdre; Zulma G Vitezica
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle.

Authors:  Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Jennie E Pryce; Yuandan Zhang; Antonio Reverter; William Barendse; Ben J Hayes; Michael E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Efficient ReML inference in variance component mixed models using a Min-Max algorithm.

Authors:  Fabien Laporte; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Genomic selection efficiency and a priori estimation of accuracy in a structured dent maize panel.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genotyping marker density and prediction models effects in long-term breeding schemes of cross-pollinated crops.

Authors:  Júlio César DoVale; Humberto Fanelli Carvalho; Felipe Sabadin; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 5.574

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.