Literature DB >> 26385811

Bilateral use of active middle ear implants: speech discrimination results in noise.

Astrid Wolf-Magele1, Viktor Koci2, Johannes Schnabl3, Patrick Zorowka2, Herbert Riechelmann4, Georg Mathias Sprinzl3.   

Abstract

Binaural sound reception has advantages over unilateral perception, including better localization and sound quality as well as speech and tone reception in both quiet and noisy environments. Up to now, most active middle ear implant (AMEI) users have been unilaterally implanted, but patient demand for an implant on the other side is increasing. Ten bilaterally-AMEI implanted native German-speaking adults were included in the study. The Oldenburg sentence test was used to measure speech reception thresholds in noise. The subject's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at a speech reception score of 50 % was calculated for different noise conditions. SRT was measured as a function of noise condition (nc) and listening condition (lc)-for example, SRT (lc, nc), with nc from S0N0, S0N-90, or S0N90 and lc from left, right or both. For each noise condition, the squelch effect and the binaural summation effect were calculated. Patients in this study demonstrated improvement with bilateral AMEIs compared to right or left AMEI only in all three tested listening conditions. Statistical significance was found in the S0N0 condition to favor usage of bilateral AMI versus either the right or left side only. The benefits of binaural hearing are well known, also in normal-hearing individuals. In the future every bilateral implantation should be a part of the clinical routine. Bilateral implantation can help to reduce problems in background noise and restore directional hearing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active middle ear implants; Bilateral hearing; Speech discrimination; Squelch effect; Summation effect; Vibrant Soundbridge

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26385811     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3783-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  12 in total

1.  Experience with vibroplasty couplers at the stapes head and footplate.

Authors:  Thomas Beleites; Marcus Neudert; Dirk Beutner; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Round window vibroplasty: long-term results.

Authors:  Klaus Böheim; Robert Mlynski; Thomas Lenarz; Max Schlögel; Rudolf Hagen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Bilateral vibrant soundbridge implantation: audiologic and subjective benefits in quiet and noisy environments.

Authors:  Pierre Garin; Sébastien Schmerber; Jacques Magnan; Eric Truy; Alain Uziel; Jean-Michel Triglia; Jean-Pierre Bebear; Samia Labassi; Jean-Pierre Lavieille
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).

Authors:  William Noble; Stuart Gatehouse
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 5.  Bilateral hearing aids: a review of self-reports of benefit in comparison with unilateral fitting.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Binaurality in middle ear implant recipients using contralateral digital hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Issam Saliba; Marie-Nöelle Calmels; Georges Wanna; Gaetan Iversenc; Chris James; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Theory of binaural interaction based in auditory-nerve data. IV. A model for subjective lateral position.

Authors:  R M Stern; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Worldwide trends in bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  B Robert Peters; Josephine Wyss; Manuel Manrique
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Speech-in-noise and subjective benefit with active middle ear implant omnidirectional and directional microphones: a within-subjects comparison.

Authors:  Mario D Wolframm; Nadia Giarbini; Christian Streitberger
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Influence of directional microphones on listening effort in middle ear implant users].

Authors:  Daniela Hollfelder; Lukas Prein; Tim Jürgens; Anke Leichtle; Karl-Ludwig Bruchhage
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 1.330

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.