Literature DB >> 22779784

Round window vibroplasty: long-term results.

Klaus Böheim1, Robert Mlynski, Thomas Lenarz, Max Schlögel, Rudolf Hagen.   

Abstract

CONCLUSIONS: The round window (RW) approach in the use of the Vibrant Soundbridge(®) (VSB) is a safe and effective treatment of conductive and mixed hearing losses for a period of more than 3 years of device use.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy as well as user satisfaction of patients with conductive and mixed hearing losses implanted with the VSB using RW vibroplasty.
METHODS: Twelve patients with conductive and mixed hearing losses were evaluated after 40 months of daily VSB use. Safety was assessed by evaluating reports of postoperative medical and surgical complications as well as by changes in bone conduction hearing thresholds. Efficacy outcome measures included aided and unaided hearing thresholds, speech recognition in quiet and in noise and subjective benefit questionnaires.
RESULTS: The safety results revealed no significant medical complications. One subject experienced sudden hearing loss after 18-24 months of device use, but still continues to wear the device to her satisfaction. With regard to efficacy, there were no significant changes from short- to long-term results in aided word understanding, functional gain or speech recognition threshold, suggesting that the outcomes are stable over time. Subjective questionnaires revealed either the same or better results compared with the short-term data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22779784     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2012.684701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  12 in total

1.  Complications after round window vibroplasty.

Authors:  Maurizio Barbara; Luigi Volpini; Edoardo Covelli; Martina Romeo; Chiara Filippi; Simonetta Monini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Presentation of floating mass transducer and Vibroplasty couplers on CT and cone beam CT.

Authors:  Robert Mlynski; Thi Dao Nguyen; Stefan K Plontke; Sabrina Kösling
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Oval and round window vibroplasty: a comparison of hearing results, risks and failures.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Federico Dagna; Claudia Cassandro; Pamela Giordano; Federico Caranzano; Michelangelo Lacilla; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  [The Vibrant Soundbridge as an active implant in middle ear surgery].

Authors:  T Beleites; M Bornitz; M Neudert; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Performance of the round window soft coupler for the backward stimulation of the cochlea in a temporal bone model.

Authors:  Antoniu-Oreste Gostian; David Schwarz; Philipp Mandt; Andreas Anagiotos; Magdalene Ortmann; David Pazen; Dirk Beutner; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for vibrant soundbridge device failures at the short incus process.

Authors:  Yoon Ah Park; Tae Hoon Kong; Jin Soon Chang; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Bilateral use of active middle ear implants: speech discrimination results in noise.

Authors:  Astrid Wolf-Magele; Viktor Koci; Johannes Schnabl; Patrick Zorowka; Herbert Riechelmann; Georg Mathias Sprinzl
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Round Window Application of an Active Middle Ear Implant: A Comparison With Hearing Aid Usage in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Iwasaki; Shin-Ichi Usami; Haruo Takahashi; Yukihiko Kanda; Tetsuya Tono; Katsumi Doi; Kozo Kumakawa; Kiyofumi Gyo; Yasushi Naito; Sho Kanzaki; Noboru Yamanaka; Kimitaka Kaga
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects.

Authors:  Eugen Kludt; Christiane D'hondt; Thomas Lenarz; Hannes Maier
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 10.  ACTIVE MIDDLE EAR VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE SOUND IMPLANT.

Authors:  Alan Pegan; Mihael Ries; Jakov Ajduk; Vladimir Bedeković; Mirko Ivkić; Robert Trotić
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.780

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.