Literature DB >> 26383774

Contact Force in Atrial Fibrillation: Role of Atrial Rhythm and Ventricular Contractions: Co-Force Atrial Fibrillation Study.

Andrea Sarkozy1, Dipen Shah2, Johan Saenen2, Juan Sieira2, Thomas Phlips2, Wim Boris2, Mehdi Namdar2, Christiaan Vrints2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In an experimental model, variable and intermittent contact force (CF) resulted in a significant decrease in lesion volume. In humans, variability of CF during pulmonary vein isolation has not been characterized. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 20 consecutive patients undergoing CF-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, 914 radiofrequency applications (530 in sinus rhythm and 384 in atrial fibrillation) were analyzed. The variability of the 60% CF range (CF(60%)) was 17±9.6 g. Hundred seventy-one (19%) applications were delivered with constant, 717 (78%) with variable, and 26 (3%) with intermittent CF. The mean CF and force-time integral were significantly higher during applications with variable than with intermittent or constant CF. There was no significant difference in CF variability, CF(60%) variability, and force-time integral between applications delivered in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. The main reasons for CF variability were systolo-diastolic heart movement (29%) and respiration (27%). In 10 additional patients, during adenosine-induced atrioventricular block, the minimum CF significantly increased at 19 sites (5.3±4.4 versus 13.4±5.9 g; P<0.001) and at 16 sites intermittent or variable CF became constant. At only 1 site systolo-diastolic movement remained the main reason for variable CF.
CONCLUSIONS: CF during pulmonary vein isolation remains highly variable despite efforts to optimize contact. CF and CF parameters were similar during sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. The main reasons for CF variability are systolo-diastolic heart movement and respiration. The systolo-diastolic peaks and nadirs of CF are because of ventricular contractions at the large majority of pulmonary vein isolation sites.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; heart; pulmonary veins; respiration

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26383774     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  7 in total

1.  Benefit of Contact Force-Guided Catheter Ablation for Treating Premature Ventricular Contractions.

Authors:  Ziming Zhao; Xiaowei Liu; Lianjun Gao; Yutao Xi; Qi Chen; Dong Chang; Xianjie Xiao; Jie Cheng; Yanzong Yang; Yunlong Xia; Xiaomeng Yin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-02-01

2.  Evolution of Force Sensing Technologies.

Authors:  Dipen Shah
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Contact force-sensing catheters: performance in an ex vivo porcine heart model.

Authors:  Eduardo Franco; Daniel Rodríguez Muñoz; Roberto Matía; Antonio Hernández-Madrid; Inmaculada Sánchez Pérez; José Luis Zamorano; Javier Moreno
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Optimizing Durability in Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Zain I Sharif; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2021-05-15

5.  Contact force sensing in ablation of ventricular arrhythmias using a 56-hole open-irrigation catheter: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed I Elbatran; Anthony Li; Mark M Gallagher; Riyaz Kaba; Mark Norman; Elijah R Behr; Manav Sohal; Abhay Bajpai; Zia Zuberi; Magdi M Saba
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Contact Force-Sensing versus Standard Catheters in Non-Fluoroscopic Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Grzegorz Karkowski; Marcin Kuniewicz; Andrzej Ząbek; Edward Koźluk; Maciej Dębski; Paweł T Matusik; Jacek Lelakowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Clinical outcomes of cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Impact of intraprocedural heart rhythm.

Authors:  Bruno Reissmann; Christian-H Heeger; Karena Opitz; Michael Schlüter; Peter Wohlmuth; Laura Rottner; Thomas Fink; Jin-Hong Gerds-Li; Shibu Mathew; Christine Lemes; Tilman Maurer; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Andreas Rillig; Doreen Schöppenthau; Andreas Metzner
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.487

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.