Literature DB >> 26383622

Detection of circulating melanoma cells in choroidal melanocytic lesions.

Manuel F Bande1, Maria Santiago2, Laura Muinelo-Romay3, Maria Jose Blanco4, Purificacion Mera5, Carmela Capeans6, Maria Pardo7, Antonio Piñeiro8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To detect and quantify circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in peripheral blood of patients with uveal melanoma primary non-metastatic tumours, and to analyze the possible relationship between CTCs and clinical risk factors.
METHODS: Prospective study with two clinical groups: 4 patients diagnosed with choroidal nevus and 8 patients with choroidal melanoma prior to treatment. A single sample of 7.5 mL of peripheral blood was taken and the CTCs were isolated using a CellSearch system that captures positive cells for the CD146 antigen (MUC18).
RESULTS: None of the patients with choroidal nevus showed CTCs in peripheral blood. More than one CTC/7.5 mL was detected in 50 % of patients with choroidal melanoma prior to treatment. The higher level of CTC cells in peripheral blood (3/7.5 mL) was detected in the patient with the larger choroidal melanoma which also presented extrascleral extension and epithelioid pathology.
CONCLUSION: Performing an analysis with the CellSearch system allows to quantify the choroidal melanoma CTCs in peripheral blood. This finding highlights the potential usefulness of this technique to achieve the correct stratification and monitoring of the treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26383622      PMCID: PMC4574067          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1420-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Background

Despite the successful treatment of uveal melanoma (UM) primary tumors, patients remain at risk of developing metastases for more than 20 years after the initial diagnosis. In the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS), Kaplan–Meier analyses estimated that the 2-, 5-, and 10-year metastasis rates were 10, 25, and 34 %, respectively. However, only 0.24 % of patients exhibited detectable metastases at the time of diagnosis [1]. The CellSearch system (Veridex) was developed to identify and quantify CTCs in the peripheral blood by immunomagnetic isolation and inmunohistochemical detection. This platform obtained the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for the CTC enumeration in patients with breast, colon, or prostate cancers [2, 3]. Despite that CellSearch system has been previously used in the detection of CTC in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma [4]; this technology has not been tested for non-metastatic/localized UM and choroidal nevi until now. Our group investigated the possibility of detecting and quantifying CTCs using the semiautomatic CellSearch system in the peripheral blood of patients CTCs in the patients with primary/localized UM. Further, in this preliminary study we examined the relationship between the presence of CTCs, clinical parameters and disease-free survival.

Methods

12 Patients (8 UM and 4 choridal nevus) diagnosed at the Ocular Oncology Unit (Sevicio de Oftalmología, Santiago de Compostela, Spain) were included in the study after informed consent according to the Declaration of Helsinky. This study was also approved by the Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica de Galicia. Peripheral blood (7.5 mL, CellSave preservative tube, Veridex) was extracted at identical venipuncture points from each patient. Melanoma cells were detected by the CellSearch system (Veridex, USA) as previously described [5, 6]. Briefly, melanoma cells were isolated with magnetic beads coated with anti-CD146 antibody. Then the CD146-expressing cells were stained with the fluorescent nucleic acid dye 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrocloride (DAPI) and with a combination of fluorescent antibodies against high-molecular-weight melanoma-associated antigen (MEL), CD34 and CD45 to distinguish melanoma cells from leukocytes and endothelial cells (Fig. 1). Cell were considered CTCs when they have oval morphology and were positive for DAPI, MEL and negative for CD34 and CD45. Absence of metastatic melanoma at the time of blood sampling was confirmed by clinical evaluation, routine biochemistry and liver ultrasonography in all patients. The comparisons were done by using the Mann–Whitney U test. The correlations were done by Pearson’s correlation analysis.
Fig. 1

Immunophenotype of melanoma circulating tumor cells (DAPI+, MEL+, CD45−/CD34−) and a leukocyte/endothelial cell (DAPI+, MEL−, CD45+/CD34+). The images beneath the cells indicate how the CTCs appear by fluorescence microscopy. The orange scale bar is 5 μm in length

Immunophenotype of melanoma circulating tumor cells (DAPI+, MEL+, CD45−/CD34−) and a leukocyte/endothelial cell (DAPI+, MEL−, CD45+/CD34+). The images beneath the cells indicate how the CTCs appear by fluorescence microscopy. The orange scale bar is 5 μm in length

Results

Among the eight patients with non-treated choroidal melanoma, 50 % displayed more than one CTC per 7.5 mL of blood. No significant correlation was shown between the CTC positivity and clinicopathological parameters, including the diameter of the largest tumor basal (LBD), the height of the tumor. The average patient follow-up was 25 months (min 16; max 27 months). The most important descriptive observation that emerged from this preliminary study was obtained from the largest choroidal melanoma, which demonstrated extrascleral extension (patient 1, Table 1). This patient presented the greatest number of CTCs and he was the only patient who presented metastatic liver disease at 12 months follow up. Moreover, four choroidal nevi (<2-mm height and <8-mm base) were tested, in which none CTCs were found.
Table 1

Description of clinical features

NumThickness (mm)Base (mm)LocationEscleral extensionCTCs
111.4610.67Superior+3
210.1611.40Nasal0
39.1016.00Nasal0
46.1113.70Temporal0
54.8110.37Temporal2
64.1210.56Optic nerve1
73.318.47Nasal2
82.4612.14Temporal0
Description of clinical features

Discussion

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with the development of metastatic disease. In recent years, there has been considerable interest in the detection of disseminated tumor cells in the peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with solid tumors. This interest is due in part to the identification and quantification of CTCs by improved methods, such as immunomagnetic/immunohistochemistry [7-9] and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [10]. Various studies have included PCR to quantify UM-associated mRNAs, such as tyrosinase and the melanoma antigen recognized by T-1 cells (MART-1/MLANA) [11]. These studies have not provided additional information beyond that of standard clinical approaches [12, 13]. This deficiency appears to be due to a lack of technique standardization, possible sample contamination, and the inability to directly quantify tumor cells. On the other hand, we have not found a clear relationship between CTCs and tumor size or histological type in the studied patients. We also found that CTCs were not detected in the peripheral blood of 50 % of patients with UM. This last point may be due to a better prognosis for these patients, but it may also owe to low detection sensitivity. The enrichment of the CellSearch System procedure with UM specific antibodies, in combination with anti-ME-PE, would significantly enhance the assay sensitivity. This study has shown that the CellSearch system is appropriate to detect CTCs in patients with primary/localized UM. The ability to quantify and characterize CTCs in patients with UM is already a clinical reality with the immunomagnetic method. This system is semiautomatic and can be used in a clinical laboratory, making it reproducible in a standardized manner. Moreover, this methodology would allow to perform further molecular characterization by probing with FITC conjugated antibodies for expression of other markers, and also the cells could be analyzed by FISH and PCR for gene expression and mutation analysis [14]. The correlation among the number of CTCs and the clinical factors such as tumor size and scleral invasion described in one of the UM patients in the present study is promising and suggest future applications of this technology. Additionally, this fact is supported by a very recent investigation describing the presence of CTCs in metastatic UM [4].

Conclusions

This finding demonstrates potential utility of CellSearch System for correct stratification, prognostic estimation, establishment of early therapies, and evaluation of response to different treatments in patients with UM.
  14 in total

1.  Identification of circulating malignant cells and its correlation with prognostic factors and treatment in uveal melanoma. A prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  S A Callejo; E Antecka; P L Blanco; C Edelstein; M N Burnier
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Circulating melanoma cells and survival in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  C Rao; T Bui; M Connelly; G Doyle; I Karydis; M R Middleton; G Clack; M Malone; F A W Coumans; L W M M Terstappen
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  Prognostic relevance of circulating tumor cells in metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  R Schuster; N E Bechrakis; A Stroux; A Busse; A Schmittel; E Thiel; M H Foerster; U Keilholz
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.935

4.  The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: V. Twelve-year mortality rates and prognostic factors: COMS report No. 28.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12

5.  Biomarker utility of circulating tumor cells in metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Leila Khoja; Paul Lorigan; Cong Zhou; Matthew Lancashire; Jessica Booth; Jeff Cummings; Raffaele Califano; Glen Clack; Andrew Hughes; Caroline Dive
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Visualization of circulating melanoma cells in peripheral blood of patients with primary uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Anja Ulmer; Julia Beutel; Daniela Süsskind; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Focke Ziemssen; Matthias Lüke; Martin Röcken; Martin Rohrbach; Gerhard Fierlbeck; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Salvatore Grisanti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Detection rate and prognostic value of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA in metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  François-Clément Bidard; Jordan Madic; Pascale Mariani; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Aurore Rampanou; Vincent Servois; Nathalie Cassoux; Laurence Desjardins; Maud Milder; Isabelle Vaucher; Jean-Yves Pierga; Ronald Lebofsky; Marc-Henri Stern; Olivier Lantz
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Detection methods of circulating tumor cells in cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefan Rodic; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Ramy R Saleh
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells Detected by the CellSearch System in Patients with Metastatic Breast Colorectal and Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  M Craig Miller; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W M M Terstappen
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Circulating tumor cells detection and counting in uveal melanomas by a filtration-based method.

Authors:  Cinzia Mazzini; Pamela Pinzani; Francesca Salvianti; Cristian Scatena; Milena Paglierani; Francesca Ucci; Mario Pazzagli; Daniela Massi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Is Tissue Still the Issue? The Promise of Liquid Biopsy in Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Daniël P de Bruyn; Aaron B Beasley; Robert M Verdijk; Natasha M van Poppelen; Dion Paridaens; Ronald O B de Keizer; Nicole C Naus; Elin S Gray; Annelies de Klein; Erwin Brosens; Emine Kiliç
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 2.  A rare case of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in a patient with uveal melanoma: case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Inna V Fedorenko; Brittany Evernden; Rajappa S Kenchappa; Solmaz Sahebjam; Elena Ryzhova; John Puskas; Linda McIntosh; Gisela Caceres; Anthony Magliocco; Arnold Etame; J William Harbour; Keiran S M Smalley; Peter A Forsyth
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 3.  The biology of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Adriana Amaro; Rosaria Gangemi; Francesca Piaggio; Giovanna Angelini; Gaia Barisione; Silvano Ferrini; Ulrich Pfeffer
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 4.  Blood Biomarkers of Uveal Melanoma: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Manuel F Bande Rodríguez; Beatriz Fernandez Marta; Nerea Lago Baameiro; Maria Santiago-Varela; Paula Silva-Rodríguez; María Jose Blanco-Teijeiro; Maria Pardo Perez; Antonio Piñeiro Ces
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-20

5.  Applying Single-Cell Technology in Uveal Melanomas: Current Trends and Perspectives for Improving Uveal Melanoma Metastasis Surveillance and Tumor Profiling.

Authors:  Mona Meng Wang; Chuanfei Chen; Myoe Naing Lynn; Carlos R Figueiredo; Wei Jian Tan; Tong Seng Lim; Sarah E Coupland; Anita Sook Yee Chan
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-01-06

Review 6.  Magnetic Particles for CTC Enrichment.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Pascal Jonkheijm; Leon W M M Terstappen; Michiel Stevens
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Usefulness of monitoring circulating tumor cells as a therapeutic biomarker in melanoma with BRAF mutation.

Authors:  Yukiko Kiniwa; Kenta Nakamura; Asuka Mikoshiba; Atsuko Ashida; Yasuyuki Akiyama; Atsushi Morimoto; Ryuhei Okuyama
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Analysis of Circulating Tumour Cells in Early-Stage Uveal Melanoma: Evaluation of Tumour Marker Expression to Increase Capture.

Authors:  Aaron B Beasley; Timothy W Isaacs; Tersia Vermeulen; James Freeman; Jean-Louis DeSousa; Riyaz Bhikoo; Doireann Hennessy; Anna Reid; Fred K Chen; Jacqueline Bentel; Daniel McKay; R Max Conway; Michelle R Pereira; Bob Mirzai; Leslie Calapre; Wendy N Erber; Melanie R Ziman; Elin S Gray
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Liquid Biopsy in Uveal Melanoma: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Eva Jin; Julia V Burnier
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2020-07-29

Review 10.  Liquid Biopsy for Solid Ophthalmic Malignancies: An Updated Review and Perspectives.

Authors:  Arnaud Martel; Stephanie Baillif; Sacha Nahon-Esteve; Lauris Gastaud; Corine Bertolotto; Barnabé Roméo; Baharia Mograbi; Sandra Lassalle; Paul Hofman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.