Yukiko Kiniwa1, Kenta Nakamura1, Asuka Mikoshiba1, Atsuko Ashida1, Yasuyuki Akiyama2, Atsushi Morimoto2, Ryuhei Okuyama3. 1. Department of Dermatology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan. 2. Life Science Research Laboratory, Tosoh Corporation, Ayase, Kanagawa, Japan. 3. Department of Dermatology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan. rokuyama@shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma, biomarkers are required to monitor drug responses. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are released from primary and/or metastatic tumors into the peripheral blood. We examined whether CTCs have potential as biomarkers by checking the number of CTCs, as well as the BRAF genotype of individual CTCs, in melanoma patients undergoing BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment. METHODS: CTCs were isolated from peripheral blood using a high-density dielectrophoretic microwell array, followed by labeling with melanoma-specific markers (MART-1 and/or gp100) and a leukocyte marker (CD45). The numbers of CTCs were analyzed in fifteen patients with stage 0-III melanoma. Furthermore, changes in CTC numbers were assessed in five patients with stage IV melanoma at four time points during BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, and the BRAF genotype was analyzed in CTCs isolated from one patient. RESULTS: We examined CTCs in patients with stage 0-III (five samples per stage: stage 0-I, stage II, and stage III), and detected CTCs even in patients with early disease (stage 0 and I). Interestingly, recurrence occurred in the lymph nodes of one stage I patient 2 years after the detection of a high number of CTCs in the patient's blood. The total number of CTCs in four of five patients with stage IV melanoma fluctuated in response to BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, suggesting that CTC number has potential for use as a drug response marker in advanced disease patients. Interestingly, one of those patients had CTCs harboring seven different BRAF genotypes, and the mutated CTCs disappeared upon BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, except for those harboring BRAFA598V. CONCLUSIONS: CTCs are present even in the early stage of melanoma, and the number of CTCs seems to reflect patients' responses to BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment. Furthermore, genetic heterogeneity of BRAF may contribute to resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Our findings demonstrate the usefulness of CTC analysis for monitoring responses to targeted therapies in melanoma patients, and for understanding the mechanism of drug resistance.
BACKGROUND: While molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma, biomarkers are required to monitor drug responses. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are released from primary and/or metastatic tumors into the peripheral blood. We examined whether CTCs have potential as biomarkers by checking the number of CTCs, as well as the BRAF genotype of individual CTCs, in melanomapatients undergoing BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment. METHODS: CTCs were isolated from peripheral blood using a high-density dielectrophoretic microwell array, followed by labeling with melanoma-specific markers (MART-1 and/or gp100) and a leukocyte marker (CD45). The numbers of CTCs were analyzed in fifteen patients with stage 0-III melanoma. Furthermore, changes in CTC numbers were assessed in five patients with stage IV melanoma at four time points during BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, and the BRAF genotype was analyzed in CTCs isolated from one patient. RESULTS: We examined CTCs in patients with stage 0-III (five samples per stage: stage 0-I, stage II, and stage III), and detected CTCs even in patients with early disease (stage 0 and I). Interestingly, recurrence occurred in the lymph nodes of one stage I patient 2 years after the detection of a high number of CTCs in the patient's blood. The total number of CTCs in four of five patients with stage IV melanoma fluctuated in response to BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, suggesting that CTC number has potential for use as a drug response marker in advanced disease patients. Interestingly, one of those patients had CTCs harboring seven different BRAF genotypes, and the mutated CTCs disappeared upon BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment, except for those harboring BRAFA598V. CONCLUSIONS: CTCs are present even in the early stage of melanoma, and the number of CTCs seems to reflect patients' responses to BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment. Furthermore, genetic heterogeneity of BRAF may contribute to resistance to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Our findings demonstrate the usefulness of CTC analysis for monitoring responses to targeted therapies in melanomapatients, and for understanding the mechanism of drug resistance.
Authors: Anthony Lucci; Carolyn S Hall; Sapna P Patel; Boomadevi Narendran; Jessica B Bauldry; Richard E Royal; Mandar Karhade; Joshua R Upshaw; Jennifer A Wargo; Isabella C Glitza; Michael K K Wong; Rodabe N Amaria; Hussein A Tawbi; Adi Diab; Michael A Davies; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Patrick Hwu; Merrick I Ross Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Caroline Robert; Jean J Grob; Daniil Stroyakovskiy; Boguslawa Karaszewska; Axel Hauschild; Evgeny Levchenko; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Jacob Schachter; Claus Garbe; Igor Bondarenko; Helen Gogas; Mario Mandalá; John B A G Haanen; Celeste Lebbé; Andrzej Mackiewicz; Piotr Rutkowski; Paul D Nathan; Antoni Ribas; Michael A Davies; Keith T Flaherty; Paul Burgess; Monique Tan; Eduard Gasal; Maurizio Voi; Dirk Schadendorf; Georgina V Long Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carlos Alberto Aya-Bonilla; Michael Morici; Xin Hong; Ashleigh Cavell McEvoy; Ryan Joseph Sullivan; James Freeman; Leslie Calapre; Muhammad Adnan Khattak; Tarek Meniawy; Michael Millward; Mel Ziman; Elin Solomonovna Gray Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Xin Hong; Ryan J Sullivan; Mark Kalinich; Tanya Todorova Kwan; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Shiwei Pan; Joseph A LiCausi; John D Milner; Linda T Nieman; Ben S Wittner; Uyen Ho; Tianqi Chen; Ravi Kapur; Donald P Lawrence; Keith T Flaherty; Lecia V Sequist; Sridhar Ramaswamy; David T Miyamoto; Michael Lawrence; Mehmet Toner; Kurt J Isselbacher; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daniel A Haber Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bingnan Zhang; C Allison Stewart; Qi Wang; Robert J Cardnell; Pedro Rocha; Junya Fujimoto; Luisa M Solis Soto; Runsheng Wang; Veronica Novegil; Peter Ansell; Lei He; Luisa Fernandez; Adam Jendrisak; Cole Gilbertson; Joseph D Schonhoft; Jiyun Byun; Joshua Jones; Amanda K L Anderson; Ana Aparicio; Hai Tran; Marcelo V Negrao; Jianjun Zhang; Wei-Lien Wang; Ignacio I Wistuba; Jing Wang; Rick Wenstrup; Lauren A Byers; Carl M Gay Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Maria A Papadaki; Anastasia Mala; Aikaterini C Merodoulaki; Maria Vassilakopoulou; Dimitrios Mavroudis; Sofia Agelaki Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 6.575