Literature DB >> 26382072

The metabolic cost of changing walking speeds is significant, implies lower optimal speeds for shorter distances, and increases daily energy estimates.

Nidhi Seethapathi1, Manoj Srinivasan2.   

Abstract

Humans do not generally walk at constant speed, except perhaps on a treadmill. Normal walking involves starting, stopping and changing speeds, in addition to roughly steady locomotion. Here, we measure the metabolic energy cost of walking when changing speed. Subjects (healthy adults) walked with oscillating speeds on a constant-speed treadmill, alternating between walking slower and faster than the treadmill belt, moving back and forth in the laboratory frame. The metabolic rate for oscillating-speed walking was significantly higher than that for constant-speed walking (6-20% cost increase for ±0.13-0.27 m s(-1) speed fluctuations). The metabolic rate increase was correlated with two models: a model based on kinetic energy fluctuations and an inverted pendulum walking model, optimized for oscillating-speed constraints. The cost of changing speeds may have behavioural implications: we predicted that the energy-optimal walking speed is lower for shorter distances. We measured preferred human walking speeds for different walking distances and found people preferred lower walking speeds for shorter distances as predicted. Further, analysing published daily walking-bout distributions, we estimate that the cost of changing speeds is 4-8% of daily walking energy budget.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  acceleration; energy optimality; legged locomotion; metabolic cost; preferred speeds; walking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26382072      PMCID: PMC4614425          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Prosthetic intervention effects on activity of lower-extremity amputees.

Authors:  Glenn K Klute; Jocelyn S Berge; Michael S Orendurff; Rhonda M Williams; Joseph M Czerniecki
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Energy cost and metabolic power in elite soccer: a new match analysis approach.

Authors:  Cristian Osgnach; Stefano Poser; Riccardo Bernardini; Roberto Rinaldo; Pietro Enrico di Prampero
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Optimal speeds for walking and running, and walking on a moving walkway.

Authors:  Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.642

4.  Multiple walking speed-frequency relations are predicted by constrained optimization.

Authors:  J E Bertram; A Ruina
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-04-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Fifteen observations on the structure of energy-minimizing gaits in many simple biped models.

Authors:  Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The cost of transport of human running is not affected, as in walking, by wide acceleration/deceleration cycles.

Authors:  Alberto E Minetti; Paolo Gaudino; Elena Seminati; Dario Cazzola
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-12-06

7.  Faster is better: implications for speed-intensive gait training after stroke.

Authors:  Anouk Lamontagne; Joyce Fung
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  How humans walk: bout duration, steps per bout, and rest duration.

Authors:  Michael S Orendurff; Jason A Schoen; Greta C Bernatz; Ava D Segal; Glenn K Klute
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008
  8 in total
  17 in total

1.  Contributions of metabolic and temporal costs to human gait selection.

Authors:  Erik M Summerside; Rodger Kram; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A controller for walking derived from how humans recover from perturbations.

Authors:  Varun Joshi; Manoj Srinivasan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Is natural variability in gait sufficient to initiate spontaneous energy optimization in human walking?

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Jessica C Selinger; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Preferred Barefoot Step Frequency is Influenced by Factors Beyond Minimizing Metabolic Rate.

Authors:  Matthew B Yandell; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Golden Gait: An Optimization Theory Perspective on Human and Humanoid Walking.

Authors:  Marco Iosa; Giovanni Morone; Stefano Paolucci
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  A public dataset of overground and treadmill walking kinematics and kinetics in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Claudiane A Fukuchi; Reginaldo K Fukuchi; Marcos Duarte
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Using force data to self-pace an instrumented treadmill and measure self-selected walking speed.

Authors:  Seungmoon Song; Hojung Choi; Steven H Collins
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Adaptive Gaze Strategies to Reduce Environmental Uncertainty During a Sequential Visuomotor Behaviour.

Authors:  F Javier Domínguez-Zamora; Shaila M Gunn; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pose estimates from online videos show that side-by-side walkers synchronize movement under naturalistic conditions.

Authors:  Claire Chambers; Gaiqing Kong; Kunlin Wei; Konrad Kording
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Vigour of self-paced reaching movement: cost of time and individual traits.

Authors:  Bastien Berret; Carole Castanier; Simon Bastide; Thomas Deroche
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.